follow_along_with_video_below_to_see_how_to_install_our_site_as_web_app
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
for late model engines? uhhh
But yes. A coyote versus LS3 is quite different.
Ask yourself this......How would it make power? What kind pf power curve would one have versus the other? What kind of rpm would the smaller motor need to make the same peak power? And so on.
HP/L & HP/ci means absolutely nothing in the real world.
It also has a better tq/l ratio, and a better lb/hp ratio in the Mustang GT Vs. Camaro platform......
So do HP/L, TQ/L, and LB/HP all mean nothing in the real world?
Yes! Why is it hard to understand that HP/L means nothing when the guy at the stoplight next to you has MORE HP!?! Things like average HP, average TQ, power under the curve, physical size of the engine, weight of the engine, are what matter.
just thought I'd throw this in here.
This car has quite a bit of work done to it... but its still a naturally-aspirated, manual 2011 GT in the 9's. Given, its not a stock bottom-end or anything, but 137 mph out of an N/A 318ci engine is pretty damn good. 8000 RPM's
They apparently beat their old record this weekend. Just a tick over 1000 horsepower winding up to 10,000rpm
Yes! Why is it hard to understand that HP/L means nothing when the guy at the stoplight next to you has MORE HP!?! Things like average HP, average TQ, power under the curve, physical size of the engine, weight of the engine, are what matter.
Yes! Why is it hard to understand that HP/L means nothing when the guy at the stoplight next to you has MORE HP!?! Things like average HP, average TQ, power under the curve, physical size of the engine, weight of the engine, are what matter.
If the guy next to you in his honda has more power than you, and you have a v8 that means your v8 is capable of more right?... if the smaller 5.0 has nearly what the larger 6.2 has for power shouldn't the 6.2 have more?
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk
Sooooo if I make 600whp in a 5.7 and smoke a 300whp 1.6l does that mean that the civic really wins since it has a higher hp/l ratio?
Definetly not. 300 whp out of only 1.6 liters is far more impressive than 600 in a 5.7... The 5.7 is 3 times the size and yet it only makes twice as much power?
This proves my point. Yeah it's impressive but the guy lost. Who cares. an evo with a shit load of boost runs a HCI T/A. Evo wins, he wins. TA wins, he wins. I never keep record of who I run and consider a win via hp/l. Maybe the civic guys consider it a win, but they aren't crossing that line ahead of the other car. It doesn't mater. It's just a ricer excuse for the loser. Just like saying "oh you had to have a power adder to beat me". Tuff titty a lose is a loseDefinetly not. 300 whp out of only 1.6 liters is far more impressive than 600 in a 5.7... The 5.7 is 3 times the size and yet it only makes twice as much power?
thisas impressive as it may be it still lost the race