You got it the wrong way around, that is pounds PER HP
Owned myself , I'd still like to see the comparison.
follow_along_with_video_below_to_see_how_to_install_our_site_as_web_app
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
You got it the wrong way around, that is pounds PER HP
I'm still lost. :rollpicard:
I'm still lost. :rollpicard:
I will guide you in the right direction.
Tune to change variable Cam Timing > Cam Swap
82.8 hp/liter > 69.4 hp/liter
Coyote Engine - Based on a motor first put into production in 1992 that had 230hp, and now puts out 414hp. It uses 5 liters of displacement (the area that the piston essentially travels through) and lots of technical wizardry to make power
LS3 - Based on a motor first put into production in 1997 that had 310hp, and now puts out 430hp. It uses 6.2 liters of displacement to make power.
no ls3 cars weigh that little
HP/L & HP/ci means absolutely nothing in the real world.
someone should do that. each through a th400 or something.
A top fuel dragster makes 16 HP/ci and 1000 hp per cylinder. If that didnt mean anything it wouldnt do 300 mph in the 1/4.
A top fuel dragster makes 16 HP/ci and 1000 hp per cylinder. If that didnt mean anything it wouldnt do 300 mph in the 1/4.
Are you assuming that no matter what the displacement the power production is exactly the same?
Here was how I am thinking... 8000 hp in a 1 liter engine is far superior to 8000 in a 10 liter engine. It takes more to get power out of a smaller engine N/A. This is exactly the case with the 5.0 and LS3.
Wow Pratt... that didn't take long for that dude to accomplish at all! Awesome build.
totally different technology between the two motors. Overhead cam vs. pushrod.
id take the LS3 simply for the aftermarket. Id love to own a fox body with a nice little procharged coyote in it though