follow_along_with_video_below_to_see_how_to_install_our_site_as_web_app
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Bands arent allowed to change or experiment? Like I said, I was never a die hard so I'm not trying to convince you guys to change...just trying to understand.
I blame Lars for all of it. He's a greedy fuck who led the band into radio-friendly ballads while playing the most basic ass bitch drum lines that a highschool band could use for intro lessons.
umm duh...Like the Moody Blues - Knights in White Satin?
I thought St Anger was the most hated Metallica album?
In regards to Mooks original question:
Load has a negative appeal because of the following reasons in my mind:
1. The band takes a 4 year break between load and the single-happy black album. I think more was to be expected out of load. The original thrash fans expected Metallica to go back to their roots. Instead they cut their hair and produced more radio-friendly rock.
2 Bob Rock. Fuck this guy. He's worse than Lars. He's probably the prick that kept whispering in his ear
3. Lars and his vision of the future.
4. 10 years past Cliffs death. Jason Newsted wasn't a band member. He just played bass.
5. Most importantly. No drugs/booze. I think they lost inspiration when they lost the ability to get fucking wasted and break shit.
Just my .02
I think if they changed the name of the band-everyone would've loved load