Why shouldn't MCD pay a living wage? They earn their money on the backs of the underclass.
If ever there was an example of a company that DIDN'T make their money on the backs of the underclass McDonalds is it. You have to be kidding with this reference. Are you kidding? McDonalds is in one of the most competitive (and quickest growing) industries there is. They don't have near a monopoly and nobody is forced to purchase there nor does their pricing structure entice anyone to buy their versus say buying at a grocery store. There is no advantage to eating at McDonalds.
I'm going to have a hard time taking the rest of what you say seriously based on this one statement alone.
While menial minimum wage jobs were never meant to be careers, some people can not advance further.
Few. Few people can't advance further. Either because they don't have the mental skills or because of a particular situation (single mothers, reformed thugs that are typecast as thugs forever, etc). Most of the time people can't advance because of their own decisions. Very few are a victim of their own circumstances (mental illness, etc). In those cases family should help them out. In the remainder, I hate to be a bad guy here but tough shit. If you popped out 3 kids before you were 20 and now you don't have time to get educated that's on you. Figure it out. I wish I hadn't squandered money I made when I was younger. I wish I invested more in my first company rather than spend it on crap while watching a competitor turn into a millionaire on the same ideas. I'm a product of my decisions, good or bad.
MCD profited 1.4 BILLION in the most recent quarter. 3 months, 1.4 BILLION. That's the posted figure after accounting fudgery. Surely the can afford to step their pay up. If you added up all the franchisee profits as well, I could see that figure easily doubling.
Who cares? How is what they make at all relevant to what they pay? And what about companies that aren't McDonalds? We're all using the most successful as an example but what about the smaller companies that would be affected by this that don't make near that? But you can forget about all that because again, profit is not relative to the value of a job. That's like one of my customer's say "you made xxxxx dollars last year. Give me $100 off this camera. You can afford it.". It's just a fundamental misunderstanding of the situation.
I'mma dumb it down for you for a minute. Ready?
If Juan doesn't flip the burger, the profits go away. Juan is a vitally important member of the workforce.
If Juan goes away Jim will be standing there ready to do the job for the same amount of money and if Jim, Susie or Gerald aren't willing to take the job McDonalds will need to adjust it's rate of compensation until they are willing to take the job. That's how it works. Is there anything more ironic than someone trying to be condescending and also being fundamentally wrong?
And here's the rub. You can't afford to live on minimum wage. Picture your life if you had 4 kids, and worked 2 31 hour part time jobs to get by. Where would you even find the time for self betterment? Say you save up a couple grand to pay for a semester of community college, oops, you got sick and had to go to the er, now you're broke again because your shitty employer that makes 5 BILLION dollars a year won't provide health insurance because you're part time.
Ah yes, it's McDonalds fault you popped out 4 children all while apparently never having learned skills that could earn you a job beyond burger cooker. You had nothing to do with that. McDonalds took your dick, jammed it in that girl and forced you to pop out those kids. They should pay!
Oh wow. So much wrong here. Pensions were bleeding GM, and those contracts were written in the 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s. Paying a living wage = good. Promising to pay someone that wage while they are no longer employed, until they die = dumb. People stopped buying because the entire market shit the bed. Don't confuse the GM bankruptcy as being employee driven. Inability to obtain debt financing due to frozen credit markets played a much larger role. They ostensibly bankrupted so they could pass the pension obligation to the federal pension fund. That should be criminal.
Actually it was a combination of frozen credit, unsustainable legacy costs and a complete failure to provide a marketable vehicle that wasn't a truck or SUV in a time where gas prices where at their highest ever. 2008 was a perfect storm. I think a pretty good argument can be made that legacy costs are the straw that broke the camel's back but I can understand that that's open for debate. It's not as black and white as you make it out to be though.
The bottom line and this is really it for me... is that unless there is someone with a gun forcing me to eat there or forcing Joe Blow to work there then the they can pay their employees whatever they want just like they can charge whatever they want for their food. If they price their food too high fewer people will eat there. If they pay too low of wages nobody will work there. It's such a simple concept. Why do people let emotion get in the way of reality?
Dirty, I have to assume that whatever marketable skill you posses is vocational.