follow_along_with_video_below_to_see_how_to_install_our_site_as_web_app
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Didn't these same two guys testify under oath that Jackson never touched them? I'll have to find the source.
EDIT: Here's a link, don't judge me by the website, it was the first one that showed up with the information I needed.
https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/ent...e-robson-suing-michael-jackson-2013-timeline/
they go into that though.
i mean this is some near god they meet and adore when kids or even super young kids. perhaps the doc could be improved by introducing some psychologists and studies on abuse like this and how it can manifest and how people rationalize dealing with what happened to them.
I feel like the families probably thought there was some economic benefit to siding with Jackson initially. And now there is a potential economic benefit to going against what they originally said. I'm sure he did diddle those kids, but Jackson probably paid for their silence.