I thought widebody was only hellcat.
who knew.
and this dude at motortrend says it's the one to buy.
Dodge says the Scat Pack Widebody pulls 0.98 g on the skidpad.
https://www.cars.com/articles/the-2...-pack-widebody-is-the-best-challenger-405315/
Great words from our own Bru
What the Scat Pack Widebody does when the road bends is far more enjoyable than the narrow-body version, and having 200-300 fewer ponies than supercharged Challengers also means this version doesn’t hate tires like Challenger Hellcats. The $6,000 Widebody package on top of the $41,740 R/T Scat Pack adds adaptive shock absorbers and bigger brakes, though perhaps the most transformative feature are 305-mm-wide tires stuffed under four widened fenders, which are especially apparent on a track with twisties. The 305 in the tire size (305/35R20) is the tire’s width in millimeters, and the Widebody’s 305-mm tires replace 275-mm-wide tires of the now-discontinued SRT 392, and the hilariously undersized (for 485 hp) standard 245-mm-wide tires of the Scat Pack R/T (275-mm tires are available in an optional package).
The Scat Pack Widebody is lighter than its Hellion counterpart by 162 pounds, and perhaps most important, its handling balance is improved with less fat over the nose sans supercharger and accompanying cooling equipment. The front wheels turn with more crispness and eagerness, and weight distribution is 55/45 percent front/rear versus 57/43 for the Hellcat. You can get on the accelerator sooner in the R/T Scat Pack Widebody versus a Hellcat, and overall you have more comfort with the pedal instead of trepidation not knowing just how badly you’ll be spinning in the grass in the Hellcat. And there’s no comparison that the R/T Scat Pack Widebody is a superior handling car against the 245-mm-wide version, which is about as reluctant turning into corners as a toddler is getting into a car seat after being given the purple bottle instead of the red one.
Being the best Challenger doesn’t mean perfection, however. The Challenger R/T Scat Pack Widebody is still the most traditional of the muscle cars and isn’t totally at home on a road circuit like the lighter, nimbler Chevrolet Camaro SS and Ford Mustang GT, though it’s worlds better than what we had before. The $6,000 Widebody package is without a doubt a must-have package if you must have a Challenger Scat Pack. And despite those meats on the front wheels, the car tracks cleanly at highway speeds and doesn’t tug and pull down the road like some cars with wide front tires.
who knew.
and this dude at motortrend says it's the one to buy.
2020 Dodge Charger Scat Pack Widebody First Drive Review
The Dodge Charger Hellcat gets all the headlines for its 707-hp engine, but when it comes time to drive, the car you really want is the Scat Pack Widebody.
www.motortrend.com
Dodge says the Scat Pack Widebody pulls 0.98 g on the skidpad.
https://www.cars.com/articles/the-2...-pack-widebody-is-the-best-challenger-405315/
Great words from our own Bru
What the Scat Pack Widebody does when the road bends is far more enjoyable than the narrow-body version, and having 200-300 fewer ponies than supercharged Challengers also means this version doesn’t hate tires like Challenger Hellcats. The $6,000 Widebody package on top of the $41,740 R/T Scat Pack adds adaptive shock absorbers and bigger brakes, though perhaps the most transformative feature are 305-mm-wide tires stuffed under four widened fenders, which are especially apparent on a track with twisties. The 305 in the tire size (305/35R20) is the tire’s width in millimeters, and the Widebody’s 305-mm tires replace 275-mm-wide tires of the now-discontinued SRT 392, and the hilariously undersized (for 485 hp) standard 245-mm-wide tires of the Scat Pack R/T (275-mm tires are available in an optional package).
The Scat Pack Widebody is lighter than its Hellion counterpart by 162 pounds, and perhaps most important, its handling balance is improved with less fat over the nose sans supercharger and accompanying cooling equipment. The front wheels turn with more crispness and eagerness, and weight distribution is 55/45 percent front/rear versus 57/43 for the Hellcat. You can get on the accelerator sooner in the R/T Scat Pack Widebody versus a Hellcat, and overall you have more comfort with the pedal instead of trepidation not knowing just how badly you’ll be spinning in the grass in the Hellcat. And there’s no comparison that the R/T Scat Pack Widebody is a superior handling car against the 245-mm-wide version, which is about as reluctant turning into corners as a toddler is getting into a car seat after being given the purple bottle instead of the red one.
Being the best Challenger doesn’t mean perfection, however. The Challenger R/T Scat Pack Widebody is still the most traditional of the muscle cars and isn’t totally at home on a road circuit like the lighter, nimbler Chevrolet Camaro SS and Ford Mustang GT, though it’s worlds better than what we had before. The $6,000 Widebody package is without a doubt a must-have package if you must have a Challenger Scat Pack. And despite those meats on the front wheels, the car tracks cleanly at highway speeds and doesn’t tug and pull down the road like some cars with wide front tires.