Are they really that bad? Wifey has one, I told my self if it ever went out I'd find an upgrade if it wasn't a warranty job.
As for this guy, I can see where he's coming from. Then again people get nostalgic about "super quick" SBCs with a 3/4 race cam some double humps and headers too.
In terms of power, area under the curve is where it's at for virtually anything but a drag car. A side effect of the 80s was the downsizing of turbos to reduce the "lag" such as the Garretts on Turbo Coupes going to the much smaller IHIs, or using choking turbine housings etc. We have overcome a great deal of that with better turbos, better computers, better flowing/better combustion engines and a better understanding of how the systems interact. Why fuck with a good thing in that regard?
It does leave the question of "how much power is being left on the table for the response that's being achieved?" I don't have the answer to that, but I wouldn't be surprised if compared to 10-25 years ago the percentage is significantly less.
ED:If I ever get off my ass/care to get off my ass/actually get off my ass and work on my turbo vehicle, this is something I have actually pondered at a level. I have a T66 here I swiped from Mook that would make good power, be responsive and fun. Then again, I have a turbo here from a Detroit that's ludicrously sized, probably act like an over cammed engine with my current combo etc. I'm still leaning towards/considering the over sized one just due to what he's talking about in defiance of common sense.
fucking nailed it.