User Tag List

Like Tree5Likes
  • 2 Post By Mook
  • 1 Post By willizm
  • 1 Post By syP
  • 1 Post By Chester Copperpot

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 04-14-2016, 10:12 AM   #1
Mook's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Elgin
Posts: 160,966
 
Mook's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Elgin
Posts: 160,966
Casino cash: $204292000
36.00 per day
Default LS3 Bolt on Intake Manifold Comparo

LS3 Bolt-On Intake Manifold Comparison



Cliffs:

Quote:
It’s important to note that this is not a shootout between these intakes – it’s a fact finding mission. In comparing the results between these four options, we get a better idea of the strengths and weaknesses of different designs when applied to a control, and in this particular scenario, that control is a fuel injected, 550 horsepower engine built for street use.

That means that while this LS3 might be able to take advantage of the design of LSXr, that particularly well-matched pairing is to some degree happenstance – if we were using a pair of four barrel carbs or a supercharger, the Mid-Rise might’ve yielded more gains than the FAST intake. And if this engine were built with high-RPM competition in mind, the Hi-Ram likely would have widened its gap on the top end in relation to the other three even further.

As a quick summary, here’s a look at the results of all the intakes we tested:
  • Stock LS3 – Peak: 556.3 hp at 6,500 rpm /497.2 lb-ft of torque at 5,500 rpm, Average: 311.82 hp /430.66 lb-ft (3000-4500 rpm), 513.64 hp / 479.83 lb-ft (4500-6800 rpm)
  • FAST LSXr – Peak: 566.3 hp @ 6,600 rpm / 515.3 lb-ft @ 5200 rpm (10hp / 18.1 lb-ft gain), Average: 316.45 hp /437.8 lb-ft (3000-4500 rpm), 524.35 hp /489.84 lb-ft (4500-6800 rpm)
  • Holley Hi-Ram – Peak: 605.4 hp @ 7,000 / 496.7 lb-ft @ 6,100 rpm (49.1 hp gain, 0.5 lb-ft loss), Average: 301.32 hp / 419.12 lb-ft (3000-4500 rpm), 529.08 hp / 479.62 lb-ft (4500-7100 rpm)
  • Holley Mid-Rise – Peak: 555 hp @ 6,900 rpm / 483.3 lb-ft @ 5,700 rpm, (1.3 hp / 13.9 lb-ft loss), Average: 308.99 hp /429.06 lb-ft (3000-4500 rpm), 507.03 hp / 465.32 lb-ft (4500-7000 rpm)

The takeaway here is that it’s important to consider not only how your engine is built, but how it will spend the majority of its time as well, as an intake that sacrifices low-end grunt for gains on the top might be ideal for a racing application but could easily be perceived as a net loss on the butt dyno if the engine is being used on the street the majority of the time. Putting together a clear strategy for your modifications will ensure that you get the most bang for your performance buck.
RICH17 and 98GrandPrixIraqVet like this.
__________________
- TCG Owner & Operator -
Mook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2016, 10:20 AM   #2
willizm's Avatar
Ho fuckin Ho!
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Saint John, IN
Posts: 10,432
Ho fuckin Ho!
 
willizm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Saint John, IN
Posts: 10,432
Casino cash: $46350400
2.78 per day
Default

Here I am rocking a stock intake like a sucker
Chester Copperpot likes this.
__________________
turbo: exhaust gasses go into the turbocharger and spin it, witchcraft happens and you go faster.
1998 Supra Turbo 6speed swap in progress | 2010 Escalade Premium | 2006 Highlander

willizm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2016, 10:31 AM   #3
syP's Avatar
syP syP is offline
Not Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Downers Grove, Illinois
Posts: 29,886
syP
Not Banned
 
syP's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Downers Grove, Illinois
Posts: 29,886
Casino cash: $39927005
6.69 per day
Default

rick crawford intake > most of those at a fraction of the cost.. hope this helps

I laugh when people put these $900 LSXR intakes on and gain virtually nothing.
Chester Copperpot likes this.
__________________
.: 2017 Chevy Colorado Z71 4x4
.: 2017 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited 5.7L




syP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2016, 10:55 AM   #4
Chester Copperpot's Avatar
TCGs Far Right Leader
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Shithole, IL
Posts: 29,250
TCGs Far Right Leader
 
Chester Copperpot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Shithole, IL
Posts: 29,250
Casino cash: $8548400
8.63 per day
Default

When I did the top end on the GTO, everything I read said LS3/L92 intakes are great as they are so I just used the one I had. All in at $1100 for complete top end and then dropping another $900 for a FAST? fuck that. As the article shows, that stock intake seems to do just fine.

Also, didn't we just have that video from Nelson Racing saying that stock intakes are the best, stock intakes are the fastest? :nelsonracing:
RICH17 likes this.
Chester Copperpot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2016, 10:57 AM   #5
syP's Avatar
syP syP is offline
Not Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Downers Grove, Illinois
Posts: 29,886
syP
Not Banned
 
syP's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Downers Grove, Illinois
Posts: 29,886
Casino cash: $39927005
6.69 per day
Default

pretty much
syP is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.6 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
no new posts