Let me explain:
We just traded in our 07 Grand Prix GXP for a 2003 Ford Excursion. It ended up being an equal trade at a licensed dealer in Indiana.
I am traveling for work right now so my 8 month pregnant wife is trying to get the paperwork done so its done by the time I get home.
She called a DMV today to find out what we were going to owe, and the lady she talked to acted like we had to pay tax on the full 'purchase price' of the Excursion, independant of what trade in value was.
I'm doing research online real quick and found that a RUT-25 form figured taxes based on sales price of the new vehicle MINUS the trade in value. Our trade in value of the GXP was actually slightly more than the sales price of the Excursion, and the bill of sale clearly shows that. From what I understand, the RUT-25 form calculations would show zero taxes owed. Now... I dont have the bill of sale in front of me, nor do I have an actual RUT-25 form in front of me - i'm just basing off of screen shots that I am seeing around the internet - but is there anybody who can shed some light on this before I have to go to the DMV next week and sound like an asshole who is right, or the fucking idiot who was wrong?
I'm thinking that maybe the lady at the DMV did not hear or did not understand when my wife told her that the trade in value was the same or slightly more than the purchase price of the new vehicle.
HALP!
We just traded in our 07 Grand Prix GXP for a 2003 Ford Excursion. It ended up being an equal trade at a licensed dealer in Indiana.
I am traveling for work right now so my 8 month pregnant wife is trying to get the paperwork done so its done by the time I get home.
She called a DMV today to find out what we were going to owe, and the lady she talked to acted like we had to pay tax on the full 'purchase price' of the Excursion, independant of what trade in value was.
I'm doing research online real quick and found that a RUT-25 form figured taxes based on sales price of the new vehicle MINUS the trade in value. Our trade in value of the GXP was actually slightly more than the sales price of the Excursion, and the bill of sale clearly shows that. From what I understand, the RUT-25 form calculations would show zero taxes owed. Now... I dont have the bill of sale in front of me, nor do I have an actual RUT-25 form in front of me - i'm just basing off of screen shots that I am seeing around the internet - but is there anybody who can shed some light on this before I have to go to the DMV next week and sound like an asshole who is right, or the fucking idiot who was wrong?
I'm thinking that maybe the lady at the DMV did not hear or did not understand when my wife told her that the trade in value was the same or slightly more than the purchase price of the new vehicle.
HALP!