Both cars are bone stock. From a dig it isn't even a fair contest on stock tires. But from a roll does Mook's mighty GT-R decimate all?
follow_along_with_video_below_to_see_how_to_install_our_site_as_web_app
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
You just gotta know that Pratt posted this, so the GT500 is going to have to win over and over
i want to see another GT so bad
Stock for stock, I'm not surprised with the roll outcome
Would still rather have the Nissan.
i want to see another GT so bad
GT-R is a class above the GT500 for sure. But Ford has come a long way with the Mustang. I can't wait to see what an all new, lighter and more capable Mustang chassis will do in 2015.
It isn't the size of the tire. It is the lack of force being applied to the tire. Traction is more about the coefficient of friction than tire width. The stock suspension geometry, weight bias and more are not set from the factory for optimal strait line, from a dead stop, traction. The stock tires are hard. That isn't helping matters either. Some suspension mods and corrected geometry help these cars a whole lot.
The added contact patch with say a 315 is nice to have. But if you can not apply force to get a 285 or 315 to help get the coefficient of friction up the extra tire means very little.
It's more about the tires than suspension geometry. You can swap the tires and leave the suspension stop and see an improvement. The suspension geometry on S197's is quite good from the factory.