3800 New GM car launches

[BoostInside]

Starts on page 60 or so

I would download this PDF its about 3 megs.

Notice the Camaro in 08

Click to read more...

 

[staceyyearsich]

By then I'll have a car that flys and talks

 

[mybluegtp]

Originally posted by staceyyearsich@Dec 14 2004, 03:13 PM
By then I'll have a car that flys and talks

[snapback]63945[/snapback]​

yea, flying away from you while talk sh!t.. :lolsign:

 

[BoostInside]

Originally posted by staceyyearsich@Dec 14 2004, 03:13 PM
By then I'll have a car that flys and talks

[snapback]63945[/snapback]​

GM is getting its ass kicked by Ford, average time that a new Mustang sits on a dealer lot, from when it was delivered to the moment when its sold, is about 15 min right now.

 

[Kyle]

Originally posted by BoostInside+Dec 14 2004, 05:15 PM-->

<!--QuoteBegin-staceyyearsich

@Dec 14 2004, 03:13 PM
By then I'll have a car that flys and talks

[snapback]63945[/snapback]​

GM is getting its ass kicked by Ford, average time that a new Mustang sits on a dealer lot, from when it was delivered to the moment when its sold, is about 15 min right now.

[snapback]63983[/snapback]​

[/b]

and the sad part about that is due to looks, and making a cheaper product.

in the car and driver gto vs mustang, they put the mustang ahead of gto because of looks and price, even though they said the gto whooped mustang ass in performance.

 

[BoostInside]

Originally posted by Kyle+Dec 14 2004, 05:43 PM-->

Originally posted by BoostInside@Dec 14 2004, 05:15 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-staceyyearsich

@Dec 14 2004, 03:13 PM
By then I'll have a car that flys and talks

[snapback]63945[/snapback]​

GM is getting its ass kicked by Ford, average time that a new Mustang sits on a dealer lot, from when it was delivered to the moment when its sold, is about 15 min right now.

[snapback]63983[/snapback]​

and the sad part about that is due to looks, and making a cheaper product.

in the car and driver gto vs mustang, they put the mustang ahead of gto because of looks and price, even though they said the gto whooped mustang ass in performance.

[snapback]63985[/snapback]​

[/b]

yup .... sad but true.

 

[zabolots]

Originally posted by BoostInside@Dec 14 2004, 02:48 PM
Starts on page 60 or so

I would download this PDF its about 3 megs.

Notice the Camaro in 08

[snapback]63937[/snapback]​

They must have removed that stuff from the PDF file because I don't see anything in the version that's currently at that link.

 

[Fish]

In the 90s, the Fbodies were dominating the stang in performance, but due to the cost to own a pustang, they outsold fbodies 3-1.

You could make a car that has 10000000000 RWHP, but make it 2K more than a stang, it would be outsold. Sad but true.

Plus females outnumber males, specially for any stang owner. V6 or V8. So the stangs I guess look "cute" :crazy:

 

[Kyle]

Originally posted by Fish@Dec 15 2004, 08:59 AM
In the 90s, the Fbodies were dominating the stang in performance, but due to the cost to own a pustang, they outsold fbodies 3-1.

You could make a car that has 10000000000 RWHP, but make it 2K more than a stang, it would be outsold. Sad but true.

Plus females outnumber males, specially for any stang owner. V6 or V8. So the stangs I guess look "cute"  :crazy:

[snapback]64030[/snapback]​

they also made of v6 stangs than v6 f-bodies.

also if u sit in a stang then in an f-body u can understand why ur average person would want a stang. feels more like a regular car cuz u dont sit as low and ur veiw is a little better.

 

[imported_Ron Vogel]

This has been Ford's thing for decades. If you ever get a chance, look at 60's Mustangs. I'd be willing to bet you won't find 1 straight one unless it's at a car show. Ford's have always been built cheap. My wife's last car; Mazda 626 (A Ford product) was so chinzy if you breathed on it wrong it would dent. Brakes were shot (had to get all new rotors) at 20K, I replaced the rotors again at 35K...but the pads were fine.

 

[98 TGP TOY]

Fords are built cheap? Hmm....you learn something new ever century

 

[imported_Theautoguy]

The only reason I never bought a 4th gen F-body is that I'm 6'4". They made the 4th gen's to fit short people! Back in 98', I was ready to lay down the money to buy a 95-96'ish 6-speed T/A but the only way I could fit into one was to lean the seat back to "young punk-boy racer" stance. I don't drive like that. I bought a 1st gen Lightning instead.

 

[horist]

Originally posted by Theautoguy@Dec 15 2004, 07:58 PM
The only reason I never bought a 4th gen F-body is that I'm 6'4". They made the 4th gen's to fit short people! Back in 98', I was ready to lay down the money to buy a 95-96'ish 6-speed T/A but the only way I could fit into one was to lean the seat back to "young punk-boy racer" stance. I don't drive like that. I bought a 1st gen Lightning instead.

[snapback]64203[/snapback]​

pfft 6' 4" is nothing Jim McIlvaine (7'1") has an SS and even autocrosses it though he did have to have custom seats installed to fit comfortably heh

Just drop a Race Seat in it and you'd be fine between that and climbing over a roll bar feels like I'm sitting on the ground but lots of head room