Why have UFO's been on the Navy and Congress' radar *literally* recently

Kensington

TCG Elite Member
TCG Premium
Aug 14, 2017
11,317
5,369
Going to try my hand at a little tinfoil hat cat...

This is just a working theory and is just merely speculation.

Is the US, Navy, or some contractor ready to pull the curtain off some revolutionary technology, aircraft, weapon, etc. in the near future, and have been slowly, and intentionally, "leaking" information and "evidence" of its existence to prepare the public for it?

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zo...e-tech-boss-claims-key-ufo-patent-is-operable

The Navy, in particular, has been trying to patent some technologies that were thought impossible. The room temperature superconductor and a high energy electromagnetic field generator. Both of these have always been only theoretically possible, but the Navy filing patent applications would insinuate that they were able to make them work (there needs to be operational capability to file a patent) OR they are trying to make someone think that they have achieved this. Obviously patent filings are not proof of anything, but hey where there's smoke, there could be fire.

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zo...-going-on-with-ufos-and-department-of-defense

The DoD has been much more open and willing to talk about its "encounters" with UFO's. Most have probably seen the Flir videos and other videos of mostly Navy pilots tracking high speed objects that are, as of now, unexplainable. Congress has asked for reports on these encounters and asked WTF is going on.

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zo...d-by-warning-of-similar-chinese-tech-advances

Now, could this all be a deliberately staged leak of information designed to ease the public's perception of these weapons/technologies? Or is a complete fabrication by the US and the DoD to fool what probably amounts to the Chinese doing the same thing? Or is their credible information that the Chinese have made at least made partial breakthroughs in technology and the US is trying to play catch up and is using these leaks to "prove" they are right there?

IDK what the fuck is going on, but it all seems very oddly timed, very oddly similar, and very oddly connected. I'm sure it'll amount to absolutely nothing, but as I've said before, something fucky is going on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mook

Kensington

TCG Elite Member
TCG Premium
Aug 14, 2017
11,317
5,369
Interesting that the Navy is now responding saying that 1. those videos are real and 2. that they very well could be aircraft (stopping short of coming out and saying they are aircraft)

In a response published on The Black Vault earlier this month, Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Information Warfare spokesperson Joseph Gradisher told Greenwald, “The Navy designates the objects contained in these videos as unidentified aerial phenomena.”

Greenwald inquired about the Navy’s use of the phrase “unidentified aerial phenomena” rather than “unidentified flying object” and Gradisher reportedly explained, “The ‘Unidentified Aerial Phenomena’ terminology is used because it provides the basic descriptor for the sightings/observations of unauthorized/unidentified aircraft/objects that have been observed entering/operating in the airspace of various military-controlled training ranges.”

 

Lord Tin Foilhat

TCG Conspiracy Lead Investigator
TCG Premium
Jul 8, 2007
60,713
56,848
Privy Chamber
I mean, my original theory is still a long shot, but this would play right into it. Is the US government slowly preparing the public for the revelation that extra terrestrial life exists, and visits earth?
Or it's just the secret space program and the Navy just isn't high enough to be in the know.
 

Lord Tin Foilhat

TCG Conspiracy Lead Investigator
TCG Premium
Jul 8, 2007
60,713
56,848
Privy Chamber
Navy submits patent for compact fusion reactor that could possibly be small enough to put into an aircraft

interesting, especially since they state the "impossible" in the patent description (Zero point energy, generate more output energy from less input and basically run itself forever)

It is claimed in the patent application that this plasma compression fusion device is capable of producing power in the gigawatt (1 billion watts) to terawatt (1 trillion watts) range and above with input power only in the kilowatt (1,000 watts) to megawatt (1,000,000 watts) range. By comparison, America's largest nuclear power plant, the Palo Verde nuclear power plant in Arizona, generates around 4,000 megawatts (4 gigawatts), and the A1B nuclear reactors designed for the Navy's Gerald R. Ford-class aircraft carriers generate around 700 megawatts. The patent even claims that the device can "possibly lead to ignition plasma burn, that is self-sustained plasma burn without need for external input power."
 

Kensington

TCG Elite Member
TCG Premium
Aug 14, 2017
11,317
5,369
what do you mean theoretical? Fusion reactors have been around for awhile.

While nuclear physicists and engineers have been conducting experiments with fusion reactor designs for decades, it remains challenging, to say the least, to engineer systems that can contain temperatures of hundreds of millions of degrees Fahrenheit and extremely high pressures. Most of the world’s 'successful' fusion reactors are currently only able to maintain plasma discharges for periods of time measured in minutes or even seconds.

From the article, not really what I'd call a usable technology at this point
 
Old Thread: Hello . There have been no replies in this thread for 90 days.
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant. Consider starting a new thread to get fresh replies.

Thread Info