U.S. physicists rally around ambitious plan to build fusion power plant

Mook

Mr. Manager
Staff member
Admin
May 23, 2007
207,164
118,927
Elgin
Real Name
Mike

Cliffs: U.S. fusion scientists, notorious for squabbling over which projects to fund with their field’s limited budget, have coalesced around an audacious goal. A 10-year plan presented last week to the federal Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee is the first since the community tried to formulate such a road map in 2014 and failed spectacularly. It calls for the Department of Energy (DOE), the main sponsor of U.S. fusion research, to prepare to build a prototype power plant in the 2040s that would produce carbon-free electricity by harnessing the nuclear process that powers the Sun.
 

nytebyte

Not Politically Correct
Mar 2, 2004
13,693
21,194
This won't end well...

giphy.gif
 

Turbocharged400sbc

3800 & 4T80E > ALL
TCG Premium
Jun 16, 2007
32,640
16,099
hangover park IL
Yea.... ITER is a dinosaur. MIT +1

That off-the-shelf high temperature superconducting ribbon material is showing supremely promising results...


"Fusion took a key step forward in its movement from the lab to commercial viability with the successful test of a key technology — a very powerful magnet that uses very little energy.

In the test, the magnet reached 20 tesla, which is a unit of measurement showing the strength of a magnet. (Like the car company, it's named after the engineer Nikola Tesla.) For reference, 20 tesla is 12 times more than the magnetic field of a traditional MRI, or magnetic resonance imaging scan.

It did this while consuming only about 30 watts of energy — several orders of magnitude less than the traditional copper-conducting magnet that MIT had tested previously, which used 200 million watts, said Dennis Whyte, Director of MIT's PSFC and a co-founder of CFS, on a conference call with reporters on Wednesday."

 

Turbocharged400sbc

3800 & 4T80E > ALL
TCG Premium
Jun 16, 2007
32,640
16,099
hangover park IL

OffshoreDrilling

This is my safe space
TCG Sponsor
TCG Premium
HVAC Guy
Aug 28, 2007
39,224
50,846
Homer Glen
Need lots of batteries for back up
The battery technology is getting better and better, and batteries already exist. It’s not like we have a prototype fusion reactor running and are working on commercialization. Assuming we successfully build a fusion reactor, it’s going to be decades before it could be put on the grid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Turk

Turk

Lt. Ron "Slider" Kerner
TCG Premium
Jan 21, 2008
28,518
7,969
The battery technology is getting better and better, and batteries already exist. It’s not like we have a prototype fusion reactor running and are working on commercialization. Assuming we successfully build a fusion reactor, it’s going to be decades before it could be put on the grid.
Exactly. 20 years from now I imagine solar panels and batteries in homes will be the norm.
 

Turbocharged400sbc

3800 & 4T80E > ALL
TCG Premium
Jun 16, 2007
32,640
16,099
hangover park IL
I wonder how well solar and wind farms would do to power all of the desalination plants that we're going to need to keep people from dying of thirst all over the planet.... it might be enough to Power Industrial processes in a lot of places but probably not enough to power all of the aluminum and steel arc furnace smelting plants
 
Old Thread: Hello . There have been no replies in this thread for 90 days.
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant. Consider starting a new thread to get fresh replies.

Thread Info