follow_along_with_video_below_to_see_how_to_install_our_site_as_web_app
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
only a few big innovations are needed to completely replace gas though.
more efficient battery storage (longer miles to match gas/diesel).
Faster charging (getting there, but still not as fast as filling up a tank of gas).
Pricing in line with gas offerings.
one of their points is that literally every house in the United States is a slow charger, and a level 2 charger for $500. So there are already wayyyyyy more chargers than gas pumps.Charging infastructure is the biggest one in my opinion. The number of charging stations needs to keep pace with growth.
The point is the argument was absurd then and it's still absurd now. Nobody took the market seriously and when they finally did they had done absolutely no research to enter that market and every new electric car has been touted as a Tesla-killer while failing to match specs of a 7 year old offering and not even failing by a little bit. Most haven't come close.
The Mach-E isn't in production and doesn't have any EPA range numbers. In fact, I believe their range numbers are targeted, not even promised.
Fords numbers seem too good to be true for a “first” offering. I’d say the range won’t be as good as expected, and production numbers won’t come even close to 50,000 a year
one of their points is that literally every house in the United States is a slow charger, and a level 2 charger for $500. So there are already wayyyyyy more chargers than gas pumps.
of course in reality you mean chargers for trips, which is the same argument you’d likely hear in the 1920s when people on horses were laughing at horseless carriages.
one huge change is potentially coming soon. Tesla battery day is coming soon and one huge charge is the extreme reduction or possible complete elimination of cobalt in batteries. Also possible is switching to a dry cell production method. Also the integration of super capacitors to decrease charge time and increase regenerative braking. Also they are expected to greatly reduce the price per pack.... by a huge factor.
The problem is that charging at home is slow on 110 and marginally faster on 220v.
Also, EV guys need to come up with a new "horseless carriage" analogy. Cars are the time were brand new technology. EV's date back pre-ICE "horseless carriages". Facts matter.
One other thing to note is that it looks like Trump killed the EV tax credit that was being promoted in Congress. I'm curious how the lack of a tax incentive will affect EV sales short term.
Porsche was claiming much higher range and they ended up only hitting 200 miles. In fact, every EV that I can think except tesla with a claimed 300 mile range came up short, by a lot. Just because a company can make batteries doesn’t mean their chemistry is good for long range EVsEh, point is moot. Pretty sure if they are advertising 300 miles of range, they are not going to be off by a hundred. You make it seem like it will be half of that claim or something.
What makes you think a big mfg like Ford cannot hit 50,000 a year if the vehicle is selling?
Do you have expert knowledge of their resources, manufacturing capabilities, or, are just guessing based on previous issues with other companies making batteries fast enough?
Except where the population and thus cars are the densest is cities.one of their points is that literally every house in the United States is a slow charger, and a level 2 charger for $500. So there are already wayyyyyy more chargers than gas pumps.
of course in reality you mean chargers for trips, which is the same argument you’d likely hear in the 1920s when people on horses were laughing at horseless carriages.
one huge change is potentially coming soon. Tesla battery day is coming soon and one huge charge is the extreme reduction or possible complete elimination of cobalt in batteries. Also possible is switching to a dry cell production method. Also the integration of super capacitors to decrease charge time and increase regenerative braking. Also they are expected to greatly reduce the price per pack.... by a huge factor.
Pretty sure you're just being a bit dramatic. I'm confident not every car maker that produced an EV claimed it would be a Tesla killer. Certainly, there have been a few, but, you really cannot sit there and say ALL.
You're also one many years ago that said within 5-10 years, ICE would be dead, yet, ICE sales are up compared to EV sales. This popcorn is fucking delicious by the way......
Ford didn't claim it was making the Mach E to be a Tesla killer.
This reminds me of how long it took Tesla to start making the Model 3. Oh wait, that didn't happen because Tesla is ERRRRMMMYYYGGGAWWWWD the best EVVVARRRRRR.
Get the fuck over it guys. Stop putting words in peoples mouth's. A lot of us, including myself, really like and appreciate Tesla for what it is. Stop trying to make it out like we are crapping on them just because we choose not to spend $100,000 on a car that has certain limiits that ICE owners like us are not used. Talk about calling the kettle black, most of you have been talking down and belittling us lowly ICE owners for years and we've taken it.
The problem is that charging at home is slow on 110 and marginally faster on 220v.
One other thing to note is that it looks like Trump killed the EV tax credit that was being promoted in Congress. I'm curious how the lack of a tax incentive will affect EV sales short term.
People with anti-Tesla sentiment did. I don't think I ever said that other manufacturers did.
I said in 2013 ICE would be dead faster than anyone thinks and it will happen so quickly it will sneak up on you. We're approaching the exponential part of the bell curve now.
Again I never said they did. Ironically they're the closest so far though.
You serious with this? See this is why I get my jimmies rustled. I'm not a blind Tesla nut swinger. They have their problems but you're really going to criticize the speed at which they went from making something 25,000 cars per quarter to like 90,000? And that was their first truly high volume mass produced car that went from pencils down in late 2016 to produced and rolling off the assembly line in 2017. The true delay was from July when they handed out the first 400 cars to January where they only built 222 additional cars in that time frame. Then they went from 8100 cars in the first quarter to 18,000 in the second, 56,000 in the third and 63,000 in the fourth. To accomplish that they built a fucking additional assembly line under a tent in their parking lot. The logistics involved to roll this car out at scale are staggering to consider and while the car was delayed, it wasn't delayed by long. And even those early cars are amazing. My car was one of the 222 they hand built between the initial delivery of 400 and the first quarter of 2018 when they got production truly up and running and you'd never know.
And with that experience has come improvement. Their gigafactory in China went from a fucking hole in the ground in May of this year to a full factory churning out production Chinese model 3's as of last month. That's from empty field to full factory making cars in 7 months. The Model Y is running a full quarter ahead of production schedule. Jesus christ... You say say you're not crapping on them but then pick a completely arbitrary metric to judge them by and are objectively wrong. There are very real things to criticize Tesla over. IMO, their ability to figure out manufacturing is not one of them.
Who is belittling you? Who even insinuated that you're less than for not spending $100,000 on a car? You're making shit up now.
They’ve sold more model 3s this year than 2 series, 3 series, 4 series, and 5 series BMW cars combined. Yea, nobody wants them
Very easy to back pedal, but, that's fine.Not quite. My car will add 6 miles of range per hour on 110v and 36 miles of range per hour on 240. You have to keep in mind that there is a floor for running onboard computers, pumps, etc. 110v barely exceeds that floor on most cars. So the difference between 110 and 240 is large, not marginal by any stretch.
Look at Model 3 sales numbers as the credit has reduced quarter by quarter for Tesla. They've gone up all but one quarter this year. Not only that but the price of the car and the price of certain options has gone up. Not only that, but it's a fucking car in a market where cars aren't selling and everyone wants an SUV. I think that kills the argument that people don't want electric cars and that people won't buy them without incentives. People don't want shitty electric cars and people will only buy THOSE cars with incentives.
Yes, very serious about production. Tesla overpromised and under delivered. No matter the reason, they fucked themselves and the people that were expecting them by overestimating their own capabilities.
Again, no crapping on Tesla. I just get tired of hearing the religious talk about how wonderful they are an inferior ICE cars are day in and day out. Not to mention, you EV guys are huge fucking hypocrites.
Every time there is a screw up or issue with Tesla, you all have "rational" think and justify why it happened and how it is being improved. Anytime the ICE owners try to defend something that happens with an ICE car, here come the insults, shit talk, comments on how they are all excuses, blah blah blah.
I like the cars, I just don't like most owners for the simple reason most think they are above you and anything other than a Tesla is complete shit. That's cool and all, but, when you try to rub it in peoples faces, you're asking for the shit talk.
Great example of hypocrisy - Model Y is out, years later, Ford releases the info and pictures of the Mach E. Right away, #TCGTESLAFOEVAHHHH comes out saying Ford stole Tesla's design, copied the looks, this and that, etc.
Porsche comes out with their EV, overestimates the range and it is judged by the Teslabois as a piece of shit, crappy range, costs waayyy more than a Model S, not worth it, no innovation, copied Tesla, blah blah blah. It is the same cry baby bull shit that we keep hearing.
Audi comes out with their E-tron, same thing. Piece of crap, poor range per dollar capita, Tesla made it happen first, Tesla is better, Audi won't be reliable, it is too expensive, etc.
WE fucking get it, you love your Teslas. GREAT!!!!! Not everyone feels the same way as you guys do.
But wait, there's more!!!
Anytime we point out the advantages, you guys try to pick apart everything to fit your agena and you refuse to accept facts.
Fact - ICE cars have more range than the highest model Tesla
Fact - Pumping gas is quicker
Fact - It is easier to road trip with an ICE car
Fact - ICE cars are a better bang for buck if you're talking about range and efficiency
Fact - Tesla's are fucking expensive
Fact - Tesla's are for mid-upper class people, ESPECIALLY the Model S.
Lastly - I really like Teslas. Kind of have to admit, though, there is a huge cult-like feel with the owners and a poor stigma when all is said and done.