***Official Fantasy Football League 2019***
- Thread starter Sprayin
- Start date
I was really hoping to see our records if our schedules were flipped. Before last week I didnt score under 90 IIRC.
*Edit*. I scored 73 in week 2. Every other game was 85+.
If we had each others schedules, I would be 4-2 and you would be 3-3 after our game last week.
Last edited:
I only decided to start him because my GF dragged me to a Packers bar and I wanted the game to be worth watching. Good luck for once.
Y'know, I was watching a FF show tonight and they were mentioning their 7 spot bench.
Adding an I.R. spot works for everyone. Who wants to drop Kerryon Johnson or Wil Fuller, for example?
The waiver wire is supposed to be strategy not grab any of a dozen good players who are always available. Standard setting is 6 spots, right?
As far as it benefitting me, I have 2 kickers.
Adding an I.R. spot works for everyone. Who wants to drop Kerryon Johnson or Wil Fuller, for example?
The waiver wire is supposed to be strategy not grab any of a dozen good players who are always available. Standard setting is 6 spots, right?
As far as it benefitting me, I have 2 kickers.
Last edited:
Stashing players on your bench that'll never play is stupid. Fantasy should be about making hard choices. And also if you need to dig to pick up a player because you're riddled by injuries you're not picking up a 4th string dude who might get a shot because Cliff decided he wanted to stash 7 RBs.
I have 2 RBs on my bench. Don't know where you get the 7 from?
At the start of the season, it's smart and strategic to have RBs so, hopefully, 1 or 2 of them succeed. There are always WRs available later in the year. I don't take RBs just to take RBs. You could take them too but it interferes with your draft strategy? Of course, if you guys take RBs, that will push the WRs, TEs, QBs, etc. up in value since they aren't taken at their value position so I'll take them instead. FF 101.
I don't understand why you think an I.R. spot is all about me stashing players? It would benefit the Cam Newton manager (for instance) more than it would help me this year.
Not to mention I am back to the 12th waiver spot so I have little chance of improving my team on waivers. If I was out for myself, I'd be suggesting we have waivers stick each week so, if you don't use your waiver, you keep moving up rather than resetting to 11-12 each week. I haven't suggested that at all (but I'm open to it if anyone likes the idea.) ?
I'm not trying to bitch at you, Jeff. This is all just discussion. You are a good commissioner. We just disagree on some points.
and...
At the start of the season, it's smart and strategic to have RBs so, hopefully, 1 or 2 of them succeed. There are always WRs available later in the year. I don't take RBs just to take RBs. You could take them too but it interferes with your draft strategy? Of course, if you guys take RBs, that will push the WRs, TEs, QBs, etc. up in value since they aren't taken at their value position so I'll take them instead. FF 101.
I don't understand why you think an I.R. spot is all about me stashing players? It would benefit the Cam Newton manager (for instance) more than it would help me this year.
Not to mention I am back to the 12th waiver spot so I have little chance of improving my team on waivers. If I was out for myself, I'd be suggesting we have waivers stick each week so, if you don't use your waiver, you keep moving up rather than resetting to 11-12 each week. I haven't suggested that at all (but I'm open to it if anyone likes the idea.) ?
I'm not trying to bitch at you, Jeff. This is all just discussion. You are a good commissioner. We just disagree on some points.
and...
Last edited:
I'm pretty sure you have suggested the waiver thing at some point.
I fucking hate bench stashing. If I had it my way, there would be like 3 bench spots. Waivers actually mean something then. There are good players that rot away on someones bench to never be played. It's stupid.
I fucking hate bench stashing. If I had it my way, there would be like 3 bench spots. Waivers actually mean something then. There are good players that rot away on someones bench to never be played. It's stupid.
Thoughts on this trade in my big money league. Guys making trade are brothers and always try to pull off a trade like this every year.
Its a PPR league 1pt per reception, and its a keeper league. The way the keeper works is you cant keep anyone drafted in 1st round and cant keep your keeper more than 1 year. If you keep someone drafted in 10th rd you lose your 9th round pick. So the brother who has Mahomes kept him this year as he drafted him in 10th rd last year. So if this trade goes thru his brother gets to keep him for the same value next year. 10 man league and they need 6 votes to get trade approved. I'm voting FUCK NO!
Edit: Our QB scoring isnt standard, its a high scoring custom league.
6pts for TD's bonus points for throwing for 100 yards, 200 yards, 300 yards etc
A Rodgers scored 66pts in this league last week (example of how high scoring it is)
Mahomes, Gordon, New Orleans def
For
Connor, Allen Robinson, New England def
Its a PPR league 1pt per reception, and its a keeper league. The way the keeper works is you cant keep anyone drafted in 1st round and cant keep your keeper more than 1 year. If you keep someone drafted in 10th rd you lose your 9th round pick. So the brother who has Mahomes kept him this year as he drafted him in 10th rd last year. So if this trade goes thru his brother gets to keep him for the same value next year. 10 man league and they need 6 votes to get trade approved. I'm voting FUCK NO!
Edit: Our QB scoring isnt standard, its a high scoring custom league.
6pts for TD's bonus points for throwing for 100 yards, 200 yards, 300 yards etc
A Rodgers scored 66pts in this league last week (example of how high scoring it is)
Mahomes, Gordon, New Orleans def
For
Connor, Allen Robinson, New England def
Thread Info
-
Created -
515Replies
-
8KViews
-
Participants list
