Anything below a 2.8” on a Gen V results in a more noticeable efficiency loss. Correct? Been a bit since I even thought about this, but that’s what I seem to remember.
My car was tuned running running a Gen V w/ a 2.8” pulley while I was still back in Illinois.
Now that I’m in Colorado, I’m barely hitting 10 PSI with the 2.8”. I was thinking about slapping on a 2.7” or 2.6” for fun, but not sure if that would even make a difference based upon efficiency loss.
My car was tuned running running a Gen V w/ a 2.8” pulley while I was still back in Illinois.
Now that I’m in Colorado, I’m barely hitting 10 PSI with the 2.8”. I was thinking about slapping on a 2.7” or 2.6” for fun, but not sure if that would even make a difference based upon efficiency loss.