Edmunds 2010 Ford Mustang GT Full Test

Mook

El Presidente
Admin
Joined
May 23, 2007
Messages
165,293
Reaction score
3,043
Location
Elgin
A Good Reason To Buy American
By Scott Oldham, Inside Line Editor in Chief



Vehicle Tested:
2010 Ford Mustang GT Premium 2dr Coupe (4.6L 8cyl 5M)
MSRP of Test Vehicle: $35,625 Price It!!

What Works:
Fast and comfortable; sounds good; well-put-together interior; still a performance value.

What Needs Work:
Steering effort is overly light; too much dive, squat and lean in the suspension; looks unchanged from last year's model.

Bottom Line:
Fast, fun around town and a blast in the hills. A real American performance car value, but no longer a Men's Only Club.

Featured Specs

  • 315-hp 4.6-liter V8
  • 5-speed manual transmission
  • 19-inch wheels and tires
  • Optional Track Pack

Affordable. Powerful. Rear-wheel drive.

It's what we all want: powerslides for a low monthly payment.

But with the new Hyundai Genesis coupe grabbing headlines like a publicly intoxicated Michelle Obama, Americans seem to have forgotten that it has been the Ford Mustang supplying them with that magic formula for fun for more than 40 years.

The Ford Mustang has defined affordable performance with two smoking rear tires since back when a hybrid was an Italian-bodied car powered by an American V8. You know, way back in the groovy 1960s. Even the laughable Ford Mustang II of the mid-1970s was fast for its day.

But Americans are not known for their long-term memory. Sometimes we need a little reminding. And this slate-gray 2010 Ford Mustang GT with the optional Track Pack is tire-shredding Ginko biloba.

Track Pack and the Big Bow Wow
But affordable isn't as affordable as it used to be. These days, blowing minds at the Big Bow Wow with your V8 muscle car will cost you north of $30 grand.

Base price on this 2010 Ford Mustang GT Premium is $30,995 and its MSRP with options will hit your wallet for $34,775. And it isn't even loaded (but it's close).

Performance options? Just one. The nicely named Track Pack. For $1,500 it adds a unique set of dampers, a front strut-tower brace, a shorter 3.73:1 axle ratio, a limited-slip differential, dual-piston front calipers with performance brake pads, recalibrated stability control, a set of cast-aluminum 19-inch wheels with 255/40ZR19 Pirelli P Zero summer performance tires, plus several pieces from the current Shelby GT500, including its front and rear antiroll bars, rear lower trailing links and front upper strut mounts.

As far as comfort stuff goes, this car has the Comfort Group, which includes heated front seats and six-way power adjustment for the passenger seat, a security package and the monster 10-speaker Shaker 1,000-watt audio system (which can cause bleeding). No navigation, no sunroof, although both are available. So are several different scoop and stripe options, which honestly might be worth a little extra scratch, as our very gray tester lacked a little eye candy.

Few at the Pizza City gave it a second glance, despite the fact that every body panel but the roof is new for 2010. And most of it is successful at keeping the Mustang retro instead of so last year. Positive comments we did get centered around the cool grille lights, which were a crowd favorite on the 2005-'09 model, and the new cowl-induction-style hood. The new taillights also drew some attention, but the comments weren't always flattering.





The new interior got mixed reviews as well. Only one guy thought the color-your-gauges-to-suit-your-mood isn't just dumb, but he had neon blue lights under his Evo. More than a few thought the new dash was a bit dull, and even when we told them it was ergonomically improved they didn't seem to care.

More Suspension Control, Please
Because we've driven the 2010 Mustang before, both on the street and around the racetrack at the Streets of Willow northeast of Los Angeles, we knew what to expect.

In that earlier report we complained about the new Mustang's over-boosted steering, its soft brake pedal and the way it flops around on its suspension. We wrote, "On winding canyon roads the 2010 Ford Mustang is still too big, too soft and too vague to really toss around with any measure of precision."

The Track Pack improved things, however, and we praised the additional athleticism. We wrote, "At speed on the road course at the Streets of Willow, the improvement from the Track Pack proved noticeable almost instantly. The retuned dampers do a better job of keeping the front end under control, so the initial turn toward the apex of the corner is more immediate. There's far less body roll, and the additional cornering grip allows you to push it a little harder at the limit."

But after two weeks behind the wheel of this 2010 Ford Mustang GT, we've decided that the Track Pack doesn't take things far enough. Oh, there's plenty of grip, and the Mustang has a real ability to change direction, but its suspension still dives, squats and leans far more than it needs to (Look at all that body roll in these powerslide photos. It looks like we disconnected the sway bars.), and it doesn't deal with crests or elevation changes as well as it could. Basically the Mustang's suspension works. This car is easy to drive very quickly on a mountain road, we'd just like it to feel more precise than it does, more tied down to the road. And we still think the steering is over-boosted, although it feels better in the hills than it does in the city, and the brake pedal is still too soft.

Make It Less Friendly, Please
And then there's the Mustang's lack of attitude around town. In the city there just isn't enough edge to the drive. Everything about the 2010 Ford Mustang feels a bit sanitized for your protection. Like somebody at Ford told the engineers that the guy's wife might have to drive it, too, so make it feel...friendly.

"But it's a Mustang GT, sir, with the Track Pack," says the middle management engineer to the suit. "Shouldn't we dial it in for a real driver? The guy who knows that a steering wheel that can be turned with one finger is a bad thing?"

"You fool. Men don't buy cars anymore. Our focus groups and overpaid consultants have made it clear that we need to expand the Mustang brand's appeal deeper into the female consumer pool," retorts the suit through stale coffee breath. "Now get back to work. We've lost millions in just the time it has taken me to call you stupid."

The result is an unfulfilling experience on anything but a straight road. Pound the 2010 Ford Mustang GT into some curves and it dances, but it's up on its tippy toes and never settles down long enough for the driver to find a rhythm.



Even the powertrain, which makes plenty of thrust for those late nights at the Connecting Highway and Cross Bay Boulevard, isn't well suited for the twisties. Despite the short 3.73 gears, the soft bottom end of the 4.6-liter V8's power curve (it only starts making real power at 4,000 rpm) and the super-tall 2nd gear in the five-speed conspire to make tight corner exits unexciting unless you're attacking the road at race pace. If you're willing to commit, however, this Mustang will fly in and out of any bend. It just takes high entry speeds, aggressive turn-in and a heavy right foot to keep the revs up.



It does very well in long fast sweepers, where the suspension can take a set and lean on those sticky 19-inch Pirellis, but even on faster open roads, this Mustang will get left for dead by a more agile 2009 Nissan 370Z, although it can pull away from a larger 2009 Dodge Challenger R/T.

Track Testing
Regardless of its shortcomings, this car is fast. In fact, this is the quickest, best handling and best stopping normally aspirated Mustang we've ever tested. Plus, it lays two big patches of Italian rubber if you shift 2nd gear like you're trying to tear the shifter from the fancy new console. We like that.

Making that power is essentially the same engine package that powered the 2009 Ford Mustang Bullitt. To the same old 4.6-liter DOHC V8, Ford has added a cold-air intake plus a reprogrammed ECU that bumps the redline to 6,500 rpm. That same computer also has two different fuel programs: for regular and premium gas. Peak output is 315 horsepower at 6,000 rpm and 325 pound-feet of torque at 4,250 rpm, just like the Bullitt.



When we arrived at our test track with the tank filled with premium and the traction and stability control systems off, the Mustang hit 60 mph in 5.2 seconds (4.9 seconds with 1 foot of rollout like on a drag strip), and covered the quarter-mile in 13.5 seconds at 102.9 mph. That's impressive for a car that weighs 3,572 pounds. In the slalom, this Mustang with its Track Pack hardware recorded a speed of 68.4 mph, then circled the skid pad at an eyebrow-raising 0.91g. It also stopped from 60 mph in just 107 feet.

A Good Reason To Buy American
How do those numbers compare to the performance of the rivals of the 2010 Ford Mustang GT? They kick ass.

Of course we haven't tested a new 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS yet, but the 2009 Dodge Challenger R/T isn't even close. The Mustang GT is quicker, faster and easily out-handles the Dodge. And that new Hyundai Genesis coupe everybody is swooning over? Well, the new Mustang GT out-performs it, too.

And so we've found that powerful rear-wheel-drive ride you crave. You know, the drift machine that can be bought on an hourly wage. And we've found it in red, white and blue.

Full Image Gallery
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/MediaNav/articleId=143486/firstNav=Gallery/photoId=77518

 

Bru

Well-known member
Super Moderator
Donating Member
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
37,138
Reaction score
276
They're going to have to do better than that to beat the Camaro. And why the hell don't they mention the 370Z in any of their articles as a competitor, like with the Genesis coupe? It's $30,000 and faster than this. Strange. I don't see the two-seater argument as valid, since both are the same price and this is a performance publication.
 

Yaj Yak

Harbor Master
Donating Member
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
90,618
Reaction score
1,631
gnarly. im surprised how quick they got it to go.
 

Yaj Yak

Harbor Master
Donating Member
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
90,618
Reaction score
1,631
They're going to have to do better than that to beat the Camaro. And why the hell don't they mention the 370Z in any of their articles as a competitor, like with the Genesis coupe? It's $30,000 and faster than this. Strange. I don't see the two-seater argument as valid, since both are the same price and this is a performance publication.

whats the v6 camaro have like 300? its gonna give them a run for their money right>?:hsugh:
 
OP
Mook

Mook

El Presidente
Admin
Joined
May 23, 2007
Messages
165,293
Reaction score
3,043
Location
Elgin
i didnt feel like posting it but heres edmunds hand on w/ the v6 prototype

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/FirstDrives/articleId=131090?tid=edmunds.il.home.photopanel..2.*

The acceleration numbers we pulled on the 2009 Challenger SE with its mandatory four-speed automatic transmission were as unimpressive as you would expect from a 3,819-pound car with a 250-hp engine. Zero to 60 takes 8.1 seconds. The SE eats up 16.1 seconds traveling through the quarter-mile.

Chevrolet is estimating that the V6 Camaro can get to 60 mph in 6.1 seconds and complete the quarter in 14.4 seconds. That's with either the standard six-speed manual or the optional six-speed automatic. Houlihan thinks that with final tweaking, his team will be able to get that figure down to 5.9 seconds to 60 mph. That's not going to be enough to beat a 350Z, but it would surely take down a Mazda RX-8.

Even accounting for the not exactly impartial source of this information, it's pretty clear the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro V6 will be quick enough to at least get a car enthusiast's attention.
 

Yaj Yak

Harbor Master
Donating Member
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
90,618
Reaction score
1,631
lol why didnt you feel like posting it.
 
OP
Mook

Mook

El Presidente
Admin
Joined
May 23, 2007
Messages
165,293
Reaction score
3,043
Location
Elgin
didnt feel like making the thread on the prototype...i'm almost positive edmunds did a hands on in 08 as well
 

Fish

From the mean streets....
Donating Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2007
Messages
36,281
Reaction score
83
Location
Chiraq
I like how under "what needs work" is that it looks like last years model. 2010 was supposed to be the big year the Mustang got a revamp. It did, but just little tweaks.
 

Poopshinanigans

I'm a middle of the titties voter.
Joined
Nov 18, 2007
Messages
5,948
Reaction score
0
Why the hell haven't they put a 6sp in the Mustang yet? Probably the same reason they never redid the chassis from 1979-2004.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Top Bottom