follow_along_with_video_below_to_see_how_to_install_our_site_as_web_app
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
yeah send me some more. and someone tell me why after 50# injectors and E85, and an IFR table scaling, my car is running consistently lean to the point it trips the CEL.
IFR was done as follows (with DHP) 36#injectors(33.7#)/50#injectors(50) = .674
E85 -> .674*1.33 =.89642 scale factor
I feel like something is wrong, because I dont think the tune should be off THIS much... also, a pulley change from a 3.4 to a 3.2. typically resulted in slightly higher maf readings at idle and cruise, but nothing like +16 LTFTs constantly, and up to +30 in VE tuning mode.
I personaly wouldn't mess with VE unless you are 100% on the ifr being right.Thanks for the help ron. What I'm still concerned about is if the math is even right. if in fact I need to do it the other way around (50/36) and then multiply by the 1.3xx.
The VE tune we did last night eventually evened out to around the right place, though it did go to -5ish ltfts at the end of the night. it started at +30 though... should we have done something differently instead of just modifying the VE?
set the max timing to 22-24 for WOT. .
hmm... I don't know how you pt guys scale your IFR table for bigger injectors.
I think that might be the problem. Staight up math (33%) did not work for me either in PT. I'll post up my 55# table later tonight when I get home.
Weird... On phat's car it worked absolutely perfectly, seriously took like 15 seconds.
E85 is for racecars