Cadillac CTS-V or Chevrolet SS? for $30k (poll)

CTS-V or SS

  • CTS-V

    Votes: 34 59.6%
  • SS

    Votes: 23 40.4%

  • Total voters
    57

DEEZUZ

Escrow shortage crew
Donating Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
45,476
Reaction score
1,303
Location
NWI
SS hands down, but it has to be that baby puke pea green color.

Sleeper like a mofo
 
OP
Bru

Bru

Well-known member
Super Moderator
Donating Member
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
37,119
Reaction score
237
So for the V camp, why? Simply more power? Better looks? Mod-ability?
 

IceCreamAssassin

FBMM
Donating Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
6,903
Reaction score
292
Location
Cary
This is tough. I hate the V coupes so it would have to be a manual sedan or wagon. Wagons are way to much but the sedans are reasonable. The SS I would want in manual which seems difficult to find for $30k still. The fact you can grab one of the autos though and then get that turbo kit installed for $7k which made amazing numbers is hard to pass up.

In conclusion I have no fucking idea because both are awesome. Isn’t it your job to tell which is better [MENTION=12]Bru[/MENTION] ?
 

SleeperLS

Desert Racer
Donating Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2008
Messages
11,031
Reaction score
179
Location
Sandia Mountain
I chose the V because I am not a fan of the SS styling. There is something about the looks that just don't do it for me. Though, I feel like modding either one would have good results.
 

IZZy

Powered by ES
Joined
Dec 15, 2007
Messages
38,986
Reaction score
2
V all day every day.

Looks and it’s a Cadillac
 

ilikemtb999

I eat dirt
Donating Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2007
Messages
69,258
Reaction score
450
Location
Denver, CO
So for the V camp, why? Simply more power? Better looks? Mod-ability?
I chose the V because it’s not going anywhere and manual ones are easier to find in that price range. I love the SS for its subtle looks but I could see it getting like gto’s/g8’s are far as finding replacement parts in the future.


If manual SS’s with magneride exist for $30k I’d take that over a V all day though. Orange blast metallic please.
 
OP
Bru

Bru

Well-known member
Super Moderator
Donating Member
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
37,119
Reaction score
237
This is tough. I hate the V coupes so it would have to be a manual sedan or wagon. Wagons are way to much but the sedans are reasonable. The SS I would want in manual which seems difficult to find for $30k still. The fact you can grab one of the autos though and then get that turbo kit installed for $7k which made amazing numbers is hard to pass up.

In conclusion I have no fucking idea because both are awesome. Isn’t it your job to tell which is better [MENTION=12]Bru[/MENTION] ?
I wanted to hear what other people think. Including those who have owned one or the other, or both. Honestly, I have alerts set up for whenever one or the other pops us less than $30k. My wife hasn't remembered any car I bring home except for a few, and one of those was the pearl white 2012 CTS-V sedan I took on power tour; though I'd want chrome wheels instead of black. Such a classy fucking car.

The SS has more safety technology and a warranty, and I think a nicer interior and handles better (the 2014 actually handles crisper, flatter and with more grip than the mag-ride 2015/2016 SS, but has worse ride quality.) But I'm mild on its looks, and I struggle with vanity because objectively it's a great car but it's also a little dorky looking.

It's all window shopping now. Don't know if I'll be able to swing anything in 2018 with a baby and a house on the way. One thing I've found: people do stupid shit to the V's appearance. Orange wheels, sticker highlights, green brake calipers, bad plasti-dip. It's like shopping for a 350Z.
 

Blood on Blood

rumble baby rumble
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Messages
37,055
Reaction score
548
A 2009, 77k mile CTSV vs a 2014, 19k mile SS?

That’s like comparing a ridden hard, 36 yrs old, yet still attempting to be classy, prostitute to a next door neighbor, recently kicked out of parent’s home, cream pied a handful of times, analed once, 20 yrs old.

Both will give you the same pleasure, and yet different headaches.

Go with the younger model and let yourself put the hard miles on her.
 

ragingclue

Well-known member
Donating Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2013
Messages
1,990
Reaction score
122
V2 has more power, MRC, looks much better IMO. Don't have much experience with the Caddy infotainment but I'd be floored if it was any more infuriating than the buggy dinosaur MyLink in the SS.

'15+ 6MT I'd take over the V2 if they made the price cutoff, but it doesn't look like there are many of those. '14 SS seems like a good value for modding though, without having to worry about the problems added by the new features for '15+.

Those 6MT SSs seem to be holding their value very well. Crazy considering how many got them for $10k off or more. I do not think I want to own it out of warranty though. We'll see.
 

IceCreamAssassin

FBMM
Donating Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
6,903
Reaction score
292
Location
Cary
I wanted to hear what other people think. Including those who have owned one or the other, or both. Honestly, I have alerts set up for whenever one or the other pops us less than $30k. My wife hasn't remembered any car I bring home except for a few, and one of those was the pearl white 2012 CTS-V sedan I took on power tour; though I'd want chrome wheels instead of black. Such a classy fucking car.



The SS has more safety technology and a warranty, and I think a nicer interior and handles better (the 2014 actually handles crisper, flatter and with more grip than the mag-ride 2015/2016 SS, but has worse ride quality.) But I'm mild on its looks, and I struggle with vanity because objectively it's a great car but it's also a little dorky looking.



It's all window shopping now. Don't know if I'll be able to swing anything in 2018 with a baby and a house on the way. One thing I've found: people do stupid shit to the V's appearance. Orange wheels, sticker highlights, green brake calipers, bad plasti-dip. It's like shopping for a 350Z.


I’ve driven neither and will follow this because I actually search both almost daily. Although I’m not sure I want to spend that kind of money this year I may just have to look for a first gen cts-v.
 

Spivitz

The Throttle is ur friend
Donating Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
23,170
Reaction score
952
Location
60191
V because the looks and power. Between the two listed it would be a harder decision than simply snapping my fingers and goin with the V. Big mileage difference, I'd definitely drive both to help with my decision.
 

Knowklew

Well-known member
Donating Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2014
Messages
1,829
Reaction score
21
Location
EGV
SS looks bland compared to the v
 

sickmint79

I Drink Your Milkshake
Joined
Mar 2, 2008
Messages
18,725
Reaction score
107
Location
grayslake
the v looks better, seems like the ss is newer? iirc pobst stroking it hard for them too, not a car i find visually appealing but it sounds like it's pretty solid.
 

95SC

4 cams
TCG Sponsor
Joined
Sep 10, 2006
Messages
2,510
Reaction score
594
Location
MI
SS looks bland and ugly , like an old grandma's Malibu
 

Marko

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 19, 2005
Messages
16,766
Reaction score
105
Too many miles on the V. Fuk that.

SS
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Top Bottom