đź“° Auto News 2021 Ford Mustang Mach 1 to be 'most track-capable' non-Shelby Mustang ever
- Thread starter Mook
- Start date
I guess they shouldn't. I'm just wondering who is justifying the price when you can get a slightly better track car for MUCH less. Albeit, the looks aren't as good and the interior sucks.
When every luxury SUV is $100K+ now, why wouldn't sports car prices follow the trend?
Agreed, even though I'd be scared shitless to own one because of the engine issues and the cost to replace.
The only "special" mustangs are the shelbys since they're limited production. As far as I'm concerned every other mustang might as well be a base. Dark horse...mach 1...nobody cares
mach 1 will not hold value remotely close to what a shelby will. But then you're faced with a decision: spend big dollars on a slow gt350, or spend really big dollars on the gt500
Pricing is all relative, from the econo box, to the pony car, to suv's, to trucks, etc.
The Machs will certainly hold value better than a GT. I agree with your point though.
I would have gladly paid sticker for a GT500. Ford just made it so limited that us normal people couldn't buy one.
You know what, Ford is starting to piss me off...lol
Those aren't immune either. A bud lost the motor to his '19 with barely over 100 miles pulling out of the gas station...lol
Why isnt the Camaro $70k? Just because nobody wants those ugly things?
Yet people EBT 10 year loan 392 credit score Hellcats LOL!!
I mean, Chevy just seems to be more in line with pricing, outside of the fact their interiors are garbage, but at that, you get what you pay for.
They're coming down. 2020's are in the low 80's now (which is like $70k in 2020 dollars so not terrible), a 2021 cftp by me is asking $89900
the gt500 is a lot of car for the sticker and they hit the market perfectly so obv prices have been nuts but it'll normalize
Just priced a 1LT Z51 C8 and it came to $75k. Without the Z51 its basically the same price as the Mach 1.
Ford, you are off your rocker!
I remember the days back in 16/17 when a comparable Camaro was 10k more than the Mustang. My how the tables have turned....
Just priced a 1LT Z51 C8 and it came to $75k. Without the Z51 its basically the same price as the Mach 1.
Ford, you are off your rocker!
You CAN get C8s at sticker they are all over in DC. I could drive by a lot today with like 20 C8s sitting there.
The only redeeming qualities of the gt350 are its appearance, weight, and limited production that'll help it hold value. It sucks at everything else. Its lap times aren't at all impressive despite being marketed as a track car, in a straight line it's god awful slow, and it's not reliable.
I looked at gt350R's because they only made like 700 a year and they look sick, but it's punching way way way below its price class in terms of performance. The R is barely faster than an ss 1le at the lightning lap...that's embarrassing. 7 seconds slower than a zl1 1le. I'd imagine a regular gt350 is right in line with an SS 1le because CF wheels make a big difference.
You ain't losing shit. You're a ford nutswinger and you're going to be calling
The Beast to get you a Dark Horse soon.
SOUND! That engine alone is worth the prices even if its a gamble. Plus GT350 brakes are better than a Mach 1. Only mustang with better brakes is the GT500.
The pony car wars are basically dead, that's probably why the mach is so expensive. Dodge has been making the same shit since 2015, camaros are going away, shelbys are going away
It's 2004-5 all over again. I haz a sad.
It's 2004-5 all over again. I haz a sad.
People like you will never ever ever use even 20% of the upgraded brakes capacity. You said yourself that road courses/turns don't matter...and that's the only reason to have big brakes.
Thread Info
-
Created -
181Replies
-
5KViews
-
Participants list
