📰 Auto News 2009 Nissan GT-R Updated Official 0-60mph Time

[transmaxed]

The Murcielago, ZR1, S7, Mclaren F1, enzo etc all have similar 0-60 times.

The Veyron is a 4000 pound AWD car does 0-60 in half that time.

LOL... nice list... the avg price of those cars is like $250k... haha but whatever it takes to talk shit about the GTR's unimpressive times, right?

 

[Mook]

why dont you quit being such a fan boy and drop some coin on a real car.

if i had 70k to throw down on one, id already be in it. hows that mountain of parts coming along?

 

[skeezer]

mountains

 

[radioguy6]

Did I say for under 70K? All im saying this isnt that impressive for a AWD car that's practically driven by computers.

you gotta be kidding me thats not impressive. All modern cars are have computers btw.

 

[Turk]

why dont you quit being such a fan boy and drop some coin on a real car.

Yeah, he's such a nutswinger!

 

[Turk]

I found a picture of mook from way back in the day

 

[Mook]

yea, i had glorious red hair back then. shame it turned brown :wtc:

 

[Bru]

I think it's more impressive that Nissan actually addressed the parts breakage concerns, inadvertently made the car faster and that these numbers were done with the stability control on, so no warranties voided.

 

[PANDA]

[Motor Trend]


http://www.albeedigital.com/supercoupe/articles/0-60times.html



[Google]

so only the Veyron, a MILLION DOLLAR CAR, can best the GTR in 0-60. and i'm being general as i'm sure owners have maybe pulled quicker numbers, who knows. but either way, keep trying cause i'll have a response for any of it

The website I was just on put them all at 3.3-3.4 or below.

 

[Mook]

i've already stated my case. my time for arguing has passed

 

[radioguy6]

so a better question PANDA is what time would make the GTR more impressive to you? what if it had a chevy badge?

 

[PANDA]

so a better question PANDA is what time would make the GTR more impressive to you? what if it had a chevy badge?

I would like to see mags and or non-nissan employee's run these times they claim.

 

[EmersonHart13]

And then you would find another excuse to discredit it.

 

[radioguy6]

I would like to see mags and or non-nissan employee's run these times they claim.

and when they get a better time than 3.3s 0-60 what will you say next?

 

[viper17]

GT-R = awesome in all aspect - the paddle shifters

 

[EmersonHart13]

You don't like the flappy paddle gearbox?

 

[PANDA]

and when they get a better time than 3.3s 0-60 what will you say next?

good job, I will still talk shit about this car for the simple reason mook is a nuthugger.

 

[Mook]

and i'm ok with that

 

[PANDA]

I don't have a problem with the GTR, its the ONLY new Nissan I would buy. Like I said, just like the argue with mook, radioguy, transmaxed and whoever else wants to nutswing from this car.

 

[EmersonHart13]

At least he finally admitted it.

 

[skeezer]

flappy shinebox

 

[cacicgtp7]

Personally i think ANY car that can be had for UNDER 100K that runs UNDER 4 seconds 0-60 and 11.99 and under in the quarter is impressive and amazing.

5 years ago for those kind of specs you had to shell out between 250K to 500K for something that could obtain those numbers stock. Of course there's the, "well i could buy a used ls1 and make it run 11's for 20K yadda yadda"

That's not the point here, both the Z06, GTR, and i can't really think of another car under 100K right now, are impressive cars to do that feat.

Although i'd still shell out for a LP640 if i had the money

 

[Mickey]

Alright. For real, that car is heavenly. I will agree that Nissan did an awesome job revising their flawed design. Now the car is even more of an animal and you can beat the trash out of it without voiding the warranty

 

[Euro]

It's still ugly

 

[Primalzer]

SHOW me a fucking stock rwd car doing a quicker 3.3 0-60 for less than 70k smartass. do it

Caterham R500, 0-60 2.88 seconds, starting at $61,000