🔧 BUILD Quest for improved 4th gen Fbody drivability

General Information

I wanted to update this thread (June 2023) with a more detailed summary of the 14-year journey with my 1998 Trans Am. In my day job, I'm an automotive journalist, so I drive a lot of performance cars, and every winter when the TA is under the cover I’m tempted to buy something new after driving the latest and greatest all year, but then every spring I get back behind the wheel and regain enthusiasm to keep at it. My goal over the last couple of years was to give it as much updating as possible to build a well-rounded late-model muscle car that blurs the line between muscle car and sports car, just how the new Camaro and Mustang have evolved over the years. And to get there, I had to correct a lot of self-inflicted mistakes that ruined the car’s drivability without much gain. This is quite the write-up for an only mildly interesting car, but verboseness comes with the territory, so here we go:

I bought the car from my cousin’s husband in 2009 for $4,000 with 100,000 miles. Their priorities shifted and the car was in need a lot of maintenance; it ran poorly, had dry-rotted tires and was in barn storage so it came with a family of mice for no extra charge.

What I bought was a stock 98 Trans Am with 16-inch wheels, sleek beak hood and SLP loudmouth exhaust. I immediately added drag radials, addressed the maintenance items and went to the drag strip, hoping for high 12s, low 13s because that was my expectation after being on LS1Tech for 5 minutes. HA. Well, the fastest F-Bodies run those times in later build years with 3.23/3.42 gears, LS6 intakes and factory production tweaks to the cam/heads. In stock configuration with loudmouth exhaust, my 98 with 2.73 gears, LS1 intake and 853 heads ran anywhere between 13.6 and 14.0 seconds, which was slower than my (at-the-time) daily driver mildly modded Grand Prix GTP.

From there, I added a Yank SS3600 torque converter and rear tubular lower control arms, which knocked 8/10ths of a second off the quarter-mile time to run consistent 12.8s; sub-frame connectors also went on at this time and really helped clean up the rattles and looseness of how the car flexed over bumps.

And then I ruined the car for a few years with poor choices.

I put a lot of trust into a performance shop that picked an inappropriate cam and didn’t put the effort into tuning. The car wouldn’t start when hot, it inconsistently idled and the torque converter tuning would make the car lug and vibrate. It was really a couple of miserable years with a loud, annoying and slow car. The cam was 231/235 .617/.621 113+3 with stock heads and a really mismatched powerband for an auto car with 2.73 gears. The car also had an LS6 intake, 42-pound injectors, 1 3/4 headers, off-road Y-pipe and Magnaflow exhaust. From there, I found a new tuner who fixed all the drivability issues so it drove much nicer, and then added 3.73 gears.

I had it dyno’d a few times in this configuration. The initial shop’s dyno spit out 401 rwhp. On a Dynojet at Dean's Performance with the revised tune, numbers were 370/345 in third gear with the converter unlocked. And then I had it dyno tuned from Speed Inc where it made 380 rwhp and 355 rwtq on their Dynojet. But it I was still disappointed at the track, running a best 12.0 at 113 mph. Looking back, that initial shop’s first dyno was laughable considering the trap speed and how poorly the car drove.

During this time, I also played a lot with the exhaust, finally settling on a Kooks catted Y with true merge, versus the ugly T-merges from previous designs that created that awful hammering sound at part-throttle.

And then I decided to take a big swing at the car. Up to this point, I had been running QA1 shocks at the back with drag radials, while up front was stock shocks/springs and summer tires. I hated how the car drove with a clear imbalance between the front end’s tightness and rear end’s looseness. I also had a drag-oriented short torque arm. So off all that went and in come the final suspension setup: Koni shocks, Strano springs, Strano sway bars, UMI long torque arm, double-adjustable lower control arms, adjustable panhard bar and a few other things. Holy smokes. Besides the converter, it was probably one of the biggest changes to how the car drives. Tight, controlled, responsive. It was like driving a car 20 years newer, instead of a bucket of bolts like how it drove with the old suspension.

Under the hood, I had Pat G from LS1Tech spec out a combo that would give stock-like drivability but with 11-second potential. It consisted of a pair of 799 heads (Z06-equivalent) pulled from a junkyard, which I had cleaned up and checked out, and an EPS cam with the following specs: 222/226 .626”/.626” 115 LSA +3, as well as a refresh of the valve train with trunion upgrade on stock rockers instead of something fancy the other shop installed. With this milder cam and upgraded heads with more compression, the car saw a giant torque increase under the curve, and power was much more usable and better matched to the auto trans. Now, I was making 390/375 to the wheels on Speed Inc’s dyno, but with a lot more power and torque under the curve and stock-like drivability.

That resulted in 11.82 @ 115 mph, and it has trapped as high as 117 mph. I consider this very impressive because it drives like it did when stock and power is accessible all over the place. Since then, I’ve installed a chrs1313 A/C ram air and have a dedicated set of C5 17-inch wheels with Hoosier drag radials to try and hit 11.50s, but my last time to the track with the setup was a bust because (as I discovered afterward) the throttle blade wasn’t going WOT thanks to the throttle cable adjustment being unclipped.

I still enjoy driving the car. I debate what to do with it (sell or keep) because I also feel a sense of stewardship to keep this car on the road looking and driving as good as I can make it. All the kids in the neighborhood turn around and give it a thumbs up when I drive past, and my kids (2 and 5 years old) call it “Dad’s Trans Am.” They pretend work on their cozy coupe (like dad’s car). I know it’s superficial, but I don’t think I’d get that kind of engagement in a CTS-V or newer car. Or maybe I would, because they could actually ride in a car that properly fit child safety seats … the debate continues.

  • Like
Reactions: JFish75

Lead Pipe

TCG Sub-par Member
TCG Premium
Nov 4, 2010
17,713
13,171
radials don't grow like slicks. minimal things will be done to fit those compared to slicks. My 28x10.5 slicks grow a full inch in the top end of the track. I had to roll my fender lip, hammer the inner well with BFH. Slightly trim rear bumper cover where it pokes in toward the center of the tire, you can do this with a razor blade and make it look clean. I had to bend in the metal on the front of the rocker where the front of the tire would rub because at the time I did not have double adjustable control arms. Now I do and I can move the rearend back farther and only have to trim the bumper cover. If you do not have adjustable control arms you may have to tap the metal in on the rocker in the front of the wheel opening like I did. For radials they don't grow like this so the tire is almost like its an inch smaller in diameter. You will for a fact have to roll fender lip and hammer the inner wheel well slightly. bumper cover trimming will have to be determined once you put the wheels on and look at how it sits. Now when I switched to a 10" wheel and really slammed the car down I had to cut off my bump stops completely with an angle grinder, they were in the way. But with no mini tubs I've had 28x10.5 slicks on a 10" rim in there and had the car so low that the tire is up inside the wheel well over an inch.
Awsome, thanks. I have heard that the T/A doesn't need bumper trimming like the Camaro. This may or may not be right. I was figuring rolling or cutting the fenders and BFH'n the inner fender well. I haven't decided if I should run a BMR spring or a V6 like you did. I have also read that if you cut 1 coil on a V6 spring it is the same rate as a stock V8. I just hate how high the car sits from the factory but I don't want to have it not launch for shit. I'm not putting the car on the street so I'll stick with radials.
 

Bad00ss

Rockford's Slow Junk
Apr 15, 2006
724
20
BMR non adjustable poly ended. I went from stock to these and didn't notice as drastic of a difference between doing that and then going from the stock TA to the tunnel mount. I know where the problem is coming from :rofl: The car was completely stock when I bought it and each part was added incrementally over the years so I have a good back to back comparison.

After our discussion, I'm debating a long torque arm with transmission crossmember replacement and TA provision with stock-style mount. I'd guess the transmission crossmember mounting has more chassis behind it than the tunnel mount to quell NVH, considering it's a factory structural mounting point. The tunnel mounts just have that little shield where nothing structural was intended to be mounted.

I agree in the back where your current TQ mounts it's just a sheet metal floor. Thin and will echo like a tin can where as the transmission crossmember is bolted into a strutual piece of the subframe. It is thick and solid. Shouldn't transfer sound or vibration nearly as much IMO.
 

Bru

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
TCG Premium
May 24, 2007
40,510
10,218
The plan for this year is to get the car into more of a street handling setup while taking the next step toward increased drivability. All parts are here except the front Koni Yellows, which were on backorder.

Strano springs are already on the car and will be accompanied with the following:

-Koni Yellow Sport adjustable shocks
-Strano 35 mm/ 22 bar set
-UMI LCA with rod end to reduce binding
-UMI long torque arm with relocation bracket
-Hawk slotted rotors and 5.0 pads
-Matching tires front and rear, Conti Extreme DW stock sized

The hope is to bring balance to the force, er, handling. I hate the way this thing drives with the short torque arm and drag radials in the back. Might pick up a set of sticky rears down the road for drag use.

Will also be reading up on tuning to see if I can make a difference in how much fuel this thing pukes out the back. I reek every time I drove the car and it belches black smoke out the pipes at WOT, as seen in my track vid and by everyone on TCG tour :rofl:

9414334db14720ef9032d55ed4871729.jpg


907a6975c35c52dbde0b1e453460c1b6.jpg
 

DTB_LS1

REAL RACECARS HAVE THREE PEDALS
Sep 18, 2009
455
0
Ottawa, IL
Nice setup Joe! Before I got crazy with my SS I had a Koni/Strano setup, and the car drove very nice for a lowered car. Before the Koni/Stranos I had Bilstein/Hotchkis, and the car road like a lumber wagon! Long story short it was night/day between the 2 setups, and I think you'll be very happy with it. I even cut a 1.58 on the Koni/Strano on a 315 MT DR which I felt was pretty good for a m6 car.
 

greasy

TCG Elite Member
TCG Premium
Jun 25, 2007
36,939
29,034
I just took my car out on the Konis and H&R Race Springs on Saturday. The H&R Race Springs have aggressive spring rates, with the Konis fronts set at 1 turn from full soft and the rears set at 1.5 turns from full soft the car road like near stock in terms of comfort. I couldn't believe it.

I think you'll be surprised in the mannerisms of the Konis.
 

Bru

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
TCG Premium
May 24, 2007
40,510
10,218
I ordered 1-inch adapters for the rear. I hate how the wheels tuck in the fenders so much. Plus it will give me racecar rear track width :rofl: Not sure how it will look with just 275s out back - most with that kind of offset are 315s - but I felt like giving it a try.

Current:
a77a6ea56b9a4a598397947ce22fb77d.jpg


And a car on LS1Tech with the 1-inch rear spacer.

b32e8ab1bddd9220c92833b4aa7c3122.jpg
 

Bru

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
TCG Premium
May 24, 2007
40,510
10,218
A few maintenance type updates. I had random coolant and oil vapor smell for about a year or so. Oil smell was noticeable on decel, and the coolant smell popped up at idle and when starting from a stop. More noticeable when the fans were on. Could smell it through the HVAC system.

The oil smell was a cracked PCV system that was being held together by electrical tape and luck. Re-did everything with new vacuum hose and brass fittings for the "Y" that links the banks. No more oil smell.

There weren't any leaks with the coolant system or heater hoses so I was baffled. Then I noticed the coolant expansion tank cap was cracked. Replaced that and the radiator cap, which was the wrong size, and no more smell.

Yay for cheap fixes.

Just dropped off the car for the Koni install, too.

I went to install the wheel spacers but the original studs are too long so they hit the back of the wheel. Thinking about cutting off the tips of the original studs. Didn't have a cutting wheel so that will have to wait.
 

Thread Info