Forum Register TCG Mobile Casino Live Posting Feed Garage Arcade Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   The Chicago Garage > The Garage > TCG Technical > GM Tech & Discussion

User Tag List

Like Tree24Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 01-18-2018, 09:26 PM   #1
I eat dirt
 
ilikemtb999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 68,212
Casino cash: $25537000
16.03 per day
Default To coil over or not to coil over v.A-body front suspension

So I currently have a rear QA1 coil over kit on my Buick. I recently bought matching set of single adjustable qa1 shocks. Turns out they donít fit thru the control arm without some modification. Now Iím wondering if instead of welding up holes, grinding shit and redrilling if I should just get a set of their hybrid coil overs.

Control arm pic:


I already have hotchkis 500 lb/in front lowering springs and planned on tall lower ball joints to lower the front end another 1/2Ē

After lots of reading, some people claim the hybrid coil over design can/does induce binding and side loading of the shock which can lead to premature shock wear. Flip side is so many articles and shows have been installing these on A-bodies for years now.

Coil over design in question
__________________
85 blazer.........turbo, 1 ton axles, some stuff
70 Buick GS.......resurrection in progress
10 Tahoe SSV lowered Baja edition
14 Caprice PPV woop woop
ilikemtb999 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2018, 10:25 PM   #2
Restoration Hell
 
cap42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bolingbrook IL
Posts: 1,938
Casino cash: $3786000
0.37 per day
Default

Personally I would think if the rears are coilovers having a matching front would provide a better suspension.

I would have no hesitation modifying the stock A-arms, it boils down to the cost of buying aftermarket arms vs your time/labor to modify the stockers. I'm cheap so I always lean towards the modification.
Eagle likes this.
__________________
1971 Nova - Rust bucket in process of restoration
cap42 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2018, 10:36 PM   #3
I eat dirt
 
ilikemtb999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 68,212
Casino cash: $25537000
16.03 per day
Default

All I’d be gaining is the ability to height adjust. I have the same shocks as the coil overs have (just not threaded) and I’d be getting the same 500lb spring rate with the coil overs.


The metal between the shock mounting holes and access hole are so thin I think I’d have to weld and re drill (unless I hogged out the hole in one side or the other from the shock holes.
ilikemtb999 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2018, 06:29 AM   #4
Bub
Pitter Patter
 
Bub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Pistakee Highlands
Posts: 12,040
Casino cash: $12639643
4.86 per day
Default

Honestly with your plans to keep this car forever, spend the money on the a arm. It looks stronger and it will fit better.
__________________
'14 Silverado LT, CCSB V6
'02 Aero Cub 21' Hybrid
Bub is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2018, 08:26 AM   #5
newb
 
EmersonHart13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 44,550
Casino cash: $49470000
10.23 per day
Default

@daturbosix @Eagle @Shawn1112 @greasy @Great White Drake @Turbocharged400sbc @HILROD @GG Allin @Bru @SRT41320 @Unitsn4 @74hotrodmalibu @Mr_Roboto @Intel @JBruno88 @Smokinhot
Smokinhot and Unitsn4 like this.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DEEZUZ View Post
deezuz christ out
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bub View Post
It seems cdh07 has made like a mortgage and walked away
EmersonHart13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2018, 08:49 AM   #6
Forum Sponsor
 
daturbosix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Aurora
Posts: 11,431
Casino cash: $48883918
2.77 per day
Default

modify your stock arms to fit and keep it a regular spring/shock setup.

i have that QA1 hybrid on my GN, and its stiff as fuck. great for a race car, but not a cruiser.
__________________
BY APPOINTMENT ONLY - 630.885.9333
daturbosix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2018, 09:00 AM   #7
I eat dirt
 
ilikemtb999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 68,212
Casino cash: $25537000
16.03 per day
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by daturbosix View Post
modify your stock arms to fit and keep it a regular spring/shock setup.

i have that QA1 hybrid on my GN, and its stiff as fuck. great for a race car, but not a cruiser.
They’ve got a bunch of spring rates available. Do you know which ones you have up front?
ilikemtb999 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2018, 09:43 AM   #8
3-man rules!!!!
 
Smokinhot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lansing, IL
Posts: 13,507
Casino cash: $32115829
3.09 per day
Default

Yea, thanks to old threads I was going through (thus why I was bumping shit) I will be keeping my factory style a-arms spring and shock setup. But obviously go with decent stuff.
__________________


'04 Chevy Silverado ECSB - stock go fast parts....

'12 Hyundai Accent SE - Daily Driver

79 Camaro - WORK IN PROGRESS.....

Smokinhot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2018, 09:56 AM   #9
I eat dirt
 
ilikemtb999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 68,212
Casino cash: $25537000
16.03 per day
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smokinhot View Post
Yea, thanks to old threads I was going through (thus why I was bumping shit) I will be keeping my factory style a-arms spring and shock setup. But obviously go with decent stuff.
I’ve currently got SPC upper arms with tall ball joints, hotchkis 1” lowering springs and those qa1 single adjustable shocks.


Oh also I put 4th gen f body brakes on all around with minimal effort.
Smokinhot likes this.
ilikemtb999 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2018, 10:22 AM   #10
3-man rules!!!!
 
Smokinhot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lansing, IL
Posts: 13,507
Casino cash: $32115829
3.09 per day
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ilikemtb999 View Post
Iíve currently got SPC upper arms with tall ball joints, hotchkis 1Ē lowering springs and those qa1 single adjustable shocks.


Oh also I put 4th gen f body brakes on all around with minimal effort.
That's something I'll also be doing. So much to do
Smokinhot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2018, 10:51 AM   #11
 
Unitsn4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 319
Casino cash: $14301600
0.21 per day
Default

I had QA1 on my 71. Ride quality is so subjective, what I might find acceptable may not suit the next guy. They were way too stiff for typical cruising. On the expressway, it wasn't as bad, but I didn't care for the ride with how I used the car 99% of the time. They seemed to make the car act like an old truck that handled slightly better than it did from the factory.

I did switch to Ridetech level 2 later and it was night and day. It took some adjusting, but it was a much better riding and handling car. You may need to trim the 'fingers' inside the pocket where the spring goes on the frame to avoid contact.
__________________
1971 Firebird
2017 Explorer Sport
2017 Chevy SS
Unitsn4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2018, 11:24 AM   #12
I eat dirt
 
ilikemtb999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 68,212
Casino cash: $25537000
16.03 per day
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unitsn4 View Post
I had QA1 on my 71. Ride quality is so subjective, what I might find acceptable may not suit the next guy. They were way too stiff for typical cruising. On the expressway, it wasn't as bad, but I didn't care for the ride with how I used the car 99% of the time. They seemed to make the car act like an old truck that handled slightly better than it did from the factory.

I did switch to Ridetech level 2 later and it was night and day. It took some adjusting, but it was a much better riding and handling car. You may need to trim the 'fingers' inside the pocket where the spring goes on the frame to avoid contact.
Do you recall what spring rate you had?
ilikemtb999 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2018, 11:44 AM   #13
I Haz New Teknologee
 
greasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: The Litter Box
Posts: 28,369
Casino cash: $6550000
6.48 per day
Default

Global West makes good shit.

I did not go coil overs on my car because I was operating within a budget. Since you already have rear coil overs I would think adding fronts to the equation would balance out and make the suspension perform better. I have no technical data to back this up......other than the fact that having 2 different suspension styles in the front and back would fuck with my sanity too much hahaha!
__________________
"May your George Bush drink the blood of every single man, woman, and child of Iraq" - Borat


greasy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2018, 11:45 AM   #14
 
Unitsn4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 319
Casino cash: $14301600
0.21 per day
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ilikemtb999 View Post
Do you recall what spring rate you had?
Sorry...I don't. IMO they were too high of a rate. A lighter spring may have made a world of difference.
Unitsn4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2018, 11:48 AM   #15
I eat dirt
 
ilikemtb999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 68,212
Casino cash: $25537000
16.03 per day
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unitsn4 View Post
Sorry...I don't. IMO they were too high of a rate. A lighter spring may have made a world of difference.
Spring rates have been a mind fuck for me since everything is geared towards chevelles with either a bbc or sbc. Would help if I had the ability to corner weight my car but I don’t.
ilikemtb999 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2018, 12:15 PM   #16
 
Unitsn4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 319
Casino cash: $14301600
0.21 per day
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ilikemtb999 View Post
Spring rates have been a mind fuck for me since everything is geared towards chevelles with either a bbc or sbc. Would help if I had the ability to corner weight my car but I donít.
The scales are so expensive. Nayle at S & S Chassis has them. There's a lot involved in setting the car up to properly weigh it to get an idea what rate to start with.

They all must be absolutely level in respect to one another and the floor. Once you have the springs in, you'd want to weigh it again and ensure the car is set up perfectly level. You have to imagine the car is a flat sheet of steel resting on points representing the tires at ride height. If one spring has slightly more preload than its mate across from it, it'll cause an imbalance in weight transfer. For example, the right rear has more preload than the left rear. This will cause the car to sit just slightly higher at the left front and lower at the right front. For just a cruiser, you may never notice or care. If I remember right, Black Dog Speed shop used to corner balance a car and align it. I'm not sure if they still do this. That's the other key....a very good alignment. That's very hard to find around here. At least on the south side by me.
Unitsn4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2018, 12:18 PM   #17
 
Unitsn4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 319
Casino cash: $14301600
0.21 per day
Default

If you feel like it...send Ron Sutton a message to see if he can recommend one thing over another based on how you are going to use your car. He's probably one of the most knowledgeable people you will ever deal with as far as proper suspension set up and tuning. He's super busy, but if you talk to him, you'll see he's very methodical on his advice.
Unitsn4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2018, 12:22 PM   #18
 
Intel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Palatine
Posts: 4,697
Casino cash: $32292525
1.33 per day
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ilikemtb999 View Post
Spring rates have been a mind fuck for me since everything is geared towards chevelles with either a bbc or sbc. Would help if I had the ability to corner weight my car but I donít.
To be up front I know next to nothing about these types of cars suspension.

I have mostly done spring rate type stuff for mac/strut type cars for tracking them.

Usually if you have the corner weights + motion ratio you can figure out what spring is needed to give a certain frequency. For racing cars this is much higher than say a street cruiser.

So it really depends what you are looking for. Also depends on how big of the swaybars are. One theory is to run softer springs and stiffer sways while others run stiffer springs and stock/light sways bars. It really depends what you are after for the car.
Intel is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2018, 12:22 PM   #19
Doing the jobs nobody wants to
 
Mr_Roboto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Joliet
Posts: 11,251
Casino cash: $19434000
4.18 per day
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ilikemtb999 View Post
Spring rates have been a mind fuck for me since everything is geared towards chevelles with either a bbc or sbc. Would help if I had the ability to corner weight my car but I don’t.
You're running a BBB which is a few pounds heavier than an SBC. I would go with the SBC rates or a bit heavier personally. Certainly more so than the BBC rates. If you're into harsher ride you may consider Pontiac Lemans/GTO recommendations because they're in between an SBC and BBC. Get an aluminum intake for your stuff and you'd be right where a stock iron intaked SBC would be. The big advantage you get doing coil overs is that you can interchange spring rates with a high level of granularity. For just the shock I would be pretty comfortable cutting and welding new stuff in place, I don't know if I'd trust my welding skills to doing where the spring rests tbh.
Mr_Roboto is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2018, 12:32 PM   #20
I eat dirt
 
ilikemtb999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 68,212
Casino cash: $25537000
16.03 per day
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Roboto View Post
You're running a BBB which is a few pounds heavier than an SBC. I would go with the SBC rates or a bit heavier personally. Certainly more so than the BBC rates. If you're into harsher ride you may consider Pontiac Lemans/GTO recommendations because they're in between an SBC and BBC. Get an aluminum intake for your stuff and you'd be right where a stock iron intaked SBC would be. The big advantage you get doing coil overs is that you can interchange spring rates with a high level of granularity. For just the shock I would be pretty comfortable cutting and welding new stuff in place, I don't know if I'd trust my welding skills to doing where the spring rests tbh.
I’ve got an aluminum intake, long tubes and no AC so already on the lighter side of things. Maybe I’ll check on the performance years site. The springs I currently have up front are for a sbc chevelle and are 500 lb/in but I haven’t driven on them.
ilikemtb999 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2018, 12:33 PM   #21
I eat dirt
 
ilikemtb999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 68,212
Casino cash: $25537000
16.03 per day
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Intel View Post
To be up front I know next to nothing about these types of cars suspension.

I have mostly done spring rate type stuff for mac/strut type cars for tracking them.

Usually if you have the corner weights + motion ratio you can figure out what spring is needed to give a certain frequency. For racing cars this is much higher than say a street cruiser.

So it really depends what you are looking for. Also depends on how big of the swaybars are. One theory is to run softer springs and stiffer sways while others run stiffer springs and stock/light sways bars. It really depends what you are after for the car.
I went with fairly large sway bars. I’m not afraid of a rough ride if it’s planted in turns. Really just looking for a fun canyon carver since there are so many good roads here.
ilikemtb999 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2018, 12:34 PM   #22
I eat dirt
 
ilikemtb999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 68,212
Casino cash: $25537000
16.03 per day
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unitsn4 View Post
The scales are so expensive. Nayle at S & S Chassis has them. There's a lot involved in setting the car up to properly weigh it to get an idea what rate to start with.

They all must be absolutely level in respect to one another and the floor. Once you have the springs in, you'd want to weigh it again and ensure the car is set up perfectly level. You have to imagine the car is a flat sheet of steel resting on points representing the tires at ride height. If one spring has slightly more preload than its mate across from it, it'll cause an imbalance in weight transfer. For example, the right rear has more preload than the left rear. This will cause the car to sit just slightly higher at the left front and lower at the right front. For just a cruiser, you may never notice or care. If I remember right, Black Dog Speed shop used to corner balance a car and align it. I'm not sure if they still do this. That's the other key....a very good alignment. That's very hard to find around here. At least on the south side by me.
I’m in Denver which while is the home of rust free classics, really doesn’t have much for performance shops. I’ve got my own tools for alignments too.
ilikemtb999 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2018, 12:35 PM   #23
Doing the jobs nobody wants to
 
Mr_Roboto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Joliet
Posts: 11,251
Casino cash: $19434000
4.18 per day
Default

With the weight reduction you have I'd totally give that a shot before I made any sort of changes. If anything you may find out it 1-rides a bit high and 2-You can trim a half coil to a coil to both firm the springs up and lower it a bit. That said, watch out for angle of the tie rods as they can hit on the front end. It's one of the big compromises GM made with the suspension on these cars.

Also, thread on alignment stuff. Always wanted to dabble never did such.
Mr_Roboto is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2018, 12:37 PM   #24
I eat dirt
 
ilikemtb999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 68,212
Casino cash: $25537000
16.03 per day
Default

I’m nervous to go down any lower up front due to how far the LT’s hang down. I could use a new set and I’ve read the TA performance ones tuck up much better.

I’ve seen a tie rod “fix” kit by umi. Never really looked too hard at it but guessing it addresses that? I’ll take a look
ilikemtb999 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2018, 12:39 PM   #25
Doing the jobs nobody wants to
 
Mr_Roboto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Joliet
Posts: 11,251
Casino cash: $19434000
4.18 per day
Default

It probably relocates the tie rods. It's really an issue if you start dropping via springs instead of dropping via other methods such as taller ball joints. That's one of the reasons they recommend going that route I think, it's a win in a few ways.
Mr_Roboto is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.6 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
no new posts