Dyno Day Results!
- Thread starter Bob Kazamakis
- Start date
3 runs:
293hp/360tq
290hp/354tq
288hp/340tq
MUSTANG DYNO
With the standard Dynojet correction of 1.12:
328hp/403tq
325hp/396hp
323hp/381tq
Stock heads, cam, M90, 1.9 rockers, 2.8 pulley, E85, IC, stock L67 block
First run wasn't recorded on the sheet, I have it on video and will upload it later. (as you can tell by the output, IC was getting heat soaked)
293hp/360tq
290hp/354tq
288hp/340tq
MUSTANG DYNO
With the standard Dynojet correction of 1.12:
328hp/403tq
325hp/396hp
323hp/381tq
Stock heads, cam, M90, 1.9 rockers, 2.8 pulley, E85, IC, stock L67 block
First run wasn't recorded on the sheet, I have it on video and will upload it later. (as you can tell by the output, IC was getting heat soaked)
Mustang:
240/293
Corrected for Dynojet:
268.8/328.16
Stock at crank:
303/328
Mods in sig...
http://muir13.com/IMG_6093.JPG
240/293
Corrected for Dynojet:
268.8/328.16
Stock at crank:
303/328
Mods in sig...
http://muir13.com/IMG_6093.JPG
Last edited:
I did a bunch of searching, and there is no clear answer for a conversion. Although advertisers were using either 1.12 or 1.14.
I'm probably going to have to re-dyno at a dynojet to get recognized for the stock cam record. If that's the case, I'll go with colder plugs, smaller pulley, and uncork the exhaust.
I think the 1.12 is the closest, only because I did a few builds similar to Rion's car. He did 273, and if his car was on a dynojet I'd expect 300hp out of it. Math works out to 305.
I'm probably going to have to re-dyno at a dynojet to get recognized for the stock cam record. If that's the case, I'll go with colder plugs, smaller pulley, and uncork the exhaust.
I think the 1.12 is the closest, only because I did a few builds similar to Rion's car. He did 273, and if his car was on a dynojet I'd expect 300hp out of it. Math works out to 305.
Last edited:
Smokinhot
3-man rules!!!!
thats some good power! id be happy if i was around there. we should line em up sometime
My car dynoed 219 RWHP / 263 RWTQ.
I thought that the numbers were off, but I was basing my numbers against similar cars that have run on a Dynojet which produces about 15% higher numbers. If you add on the 15% I am right were I should be - 251 RWHP / 302 RWTQ. So I am no longer dissapointed, but this car definaterly needs a power adder!!!
I had a blast and everyone was super cool!!
I thought that the numbers were off, but I was basing my numbers against similar cars that have run on a Dynojet which produces about 15% higher numbers. If you add on the 15% I am right were I should be - 251 RWHP / 302 RWTQ. So I am no longer dissapointed, but this car definaterly needs a power adder!!!
I had a blast and everyone was super cool!!
the PT did 120hp and 130ft.lbs. If you do that conversion thingy it would be 134hp and 145ft.lbs for the dynojet. I would say its closer to 120 and 130 because that is stock with 20% driveline lose. Oh, for the people expecting the SVO, i'm sorry. I tried putting on new oil feed and return lines, realized it was pointless in my driveway and couldnt get the feed line back on. The only good thing was getting the manual boost controller on.
Thread Info
-
Created -
67Replies
-
2KViews
-
Participants list
