Watson ported Voodoo heads good for 100hp!
- Thread starter Rent Free
- Start date
I agree its not cost effective vs. boost. however make an engine make more NA hp it only makes adding boost on top of that even better.
Again a 500-600 NA motor would impress the hell out of me. cost effective not at all bit its an entirely different animal ohh make it capable or spinning 8500-9k too.
Again a 500-600 NA motor would impress the hell out of me. cost effective not at all bit its an entirely different animal ohh make it capable or spinning 8500-9k too.
I helped my friend build a 383 in highschool that made 500hp na, it really wasn't an obnoxious set up
you dont say......
obviously. having a 5-600hp ls would be alot different than a 5-600hp na 5.0 though too.
funny how these always turn into "back in my day an LS or 350 could do this"
yes, yes we all know. 5-600 from less liters and in a rev happy engine is alot different type of build.
you dont say......
obviously. having a 5-600hp ls would be alot different than a 5-600hp na 5.0 though too.
funny how these always turn into "back in my day an LS or 350 could do this"
yes, yes we all know. 5-600 from less liters and in a rev happy engine is alot different type of build.
you're the one who keeps saying 5-600 hp NA motors impress you...
you dont say......
obviously. having a 5-600hp ls would be alot different than a 5-600hp na 5.0 though too.
funny how these always turn into "back in my day an LS or 350 could do this"
yes, yes we all know. 5-600 from less liters and in a rev happy engine is alot different type of build.
Yea but Coyotes need "valve wizardy" to get it done. Take away 3 cams and VCT and then what are you left with?
Hp per liter is impressive to me but yah these days you can slap a turbo on and make tons of power, it's the new thing everybody's doing it... My 5.0 makes just over 600 n/a and I could put bigger heads and a bigger cam and make 750-800hp. I will someday hopefully soon build a 1300hp N/A BBF... The valves will be the size of redbull cans and a 1" camshaft...
If you had a mild supercharged set up vs. N/A making the same power level the N/a would walk the blower combo every time.
If you had a mild supercharged set up vs. N/A making the same power level the N/a would walk the blower combo every time.
Hp per liter is impressive to me but yah these days you can slap a turbo on and make tons of power, it's the new thing everybody's doing it... My 5.0 makes just over 600 n/a and I could put bigger heads and a bigger cam and make 750-800hp. I will someday hopefully soon build a 1300hp N/A BBF... The valves will be the size of redbull cans and a 1" camshaft...
If you had a mild supercharged set up vs. N/A making the same power level the N/a would walk the blower combo every time.
HP per liters yes.
And arent you over 5.0 isnt yours stroked or what for cubes?
this never was about the cost vs hp of course its cheaper to boost it.
The power density is whats cool to me.
Say 600 hp for mathmatical purpose here. Thats 120hp per liter.
How many other engines make 120hp per liter WITHOUT some form of boost? Only one i can think of off the top of my head thats close is the honda s2000 engine.
Mine is pumpgas and stroked to a 6.0 it's a 347 stroker assembly with a big bore 4.125. Heads are small cnc ported AFR 205's.
It'd be cool for shits a giggles to see a set of the new trickflow high port 250cc or some SC1's or Victor Gliddens all ported to hell would do on a stock 302ci and see what it'd do like they did years back with John Kaase P38 heads which made 500hp on a 302ci.
There's no replacement for displacement
sure so what if a 7 liter engine was making 120hp per liter......
again this isnt about displacement or power adder.
max hp per liter aka density without boost is what is interesting to me.
Thread Info
-
Created -
31Replies
-
2KViews
-
Participants list
