YouTube 2016 Lamborghini Aventador LP 750-4 Superveloce does the Ring in 6:59

[Mook]

Click to read more...

 

[Turk]

Wtf? I am VERY impressed. The car is a pig

 

[Mook]

Ya, I was shocked to see the headline as well

 

[Turk]

Actually not as heavy as I thought. 3300lbs.

 

[Mook]

Dry weight - 3,362 lbs. I guess thats not that bad actually.

 

[Mook]

Damn, treed.

 

[bikrboy128]

sounds fucking glorious doing it too.

 

[MikeyLikesIt]

325km or 202mph in the straight...bad ass.

 

[Ear Rak]

Dry weight - 3,362 lbs. I guess thats not that bad actually.

Isnt the normal aventador 4000k lbs? Wonder where they got the weight out from.

 

[10sec]

That was an awesome video.

 

[Primalzer]

Around 6:08 was a brown pants moment

 

[YoushallgoFo]

enjoy this before the new acr takes it down LOL

 

[Primalzer]

enjoy this before the new acr takes it down LOL

I'm not sure the new ACR will drop 13 seconds from the last version, honestly. It's only up a few horsepower, it has more downforce, but it doesn't seem like the weight is going to be drastically different. I expect a few seconds, but probably not faster than the last gen ACR-X (which did a 7:03, but was 120 lbs lighter than the ACR)

 

[Spivitz]

Thing is a beast!

 

[jason05gt]

I'm not sure the new ACR will drop 13 seconds from the last version, honestly. It's only up a few horsepower, it has more downforce, but it doesn't seem like the weight is going to be drastically different. I expect a few seconds, but probably not faster than the last gen ACR-X (which did a 7:03, but was 120 lbs lighter than the ACR)

HP isn't everything. If the aero, suspension and tire changes work well - I can see the ACR under 7 mins.

 

[Primalzer]

HP isn't everything. If the aero, suspension and tire changes work well - I can see the ACR under 7 mins.

No it isn't, but the weight is much more important. I still can't see the new ACR getting under the old ACR-X's time, which was about as close to a LMGT car as you could get at the time. The new ACR is still basically full interior and road car suspension, whereas the old ACR-X was one racing seat, completely stripped interior w/o side windows, fully adjustable suspension more-so based on the race program, much more thorough aerodynamic work over the standard ACR, and much more downforce over the ACR. Only thing it didn't have was full-slicks (can't find information on what tires were used for the record run, but I'm sure they were DOT slicks). I'm sure the new ACR uses what's learned there, but still can't see it overcoming the weight disadvantage.

 

[IDAFC21]

God damn thats some impressive driving. Who the hell is piloting that thing?