follow_along_with_video_below_to_see_how_to_install_our_site_as_web_app
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Car and driver reported a 0-60 of 3 seconds flat with the auto and 11.1 1/4 mile. GM is absolutely killing it right now.
The Vette always put up good numbers but was always described as a "handful" to drive. This new vette sounds like its a lot more fun to drive on the edge.
That's a 0.3 improvement, with an auto, over a 10 year period. Hardly killing it IMO.
The vette is much more than a one trick pony.
I'm speaking in overall terms. A much better car to drive on the edge, better interior, better fit/finish. What are you referring to with the .3 anyway? This is a heavier car too.
I should add, I did say GM is killing it I meant as a whole company. Look at GM cars from 10-15 years ago and they don't even compare. Now look at a early 2000's GM compare to the early 90's, the gap in quality is a lot closer in that decade compared to this last one.
Yes, I agree, but you seem to be forgetting how great a car the C6Z06 was/is. My point is that yes, the c7Z is putting up great numbers, but it's not anything special when compared to its predecessor. The .3 is referring to the fact that an auto c7z is only 3 tenths faster in the 1/4 mile than the outgoing manual model. If the C6Z came in an auto, they may even be dead even.
And to your second point....Really? The jump from GM cars in the early 90s to early 2000s was much larger than this current jump. We are talking about comparing TPI corvettes to a C5Z06. A jump in performance doesn't get any better than that.
the performance game belongs to gm. that is all.
The car’s limits are so high, we need a solid amount of time just to come to terms mentally with its aero-enhanced grip levels. Take your Z06 to the track and prepare for the intimidation factor as you work up to speed, especially on a circuit as fast and blind as Road Atlanta. But the 50/50 weight-distributed chassis is exceptionally stable, meaning in most cases the driver is the biggest performance limiter. Regardless of what aero package you have, the car’s overall handling and tire breakaway characteristics are similar; only the total amount of grip changes significantly. The Z06 delivers a very neutral balance straight out of the box without sliding into frustrating moments of plowing understeer, yet neither does it snap into breath-sucking moments of rear-end mayhem.
Despite the high heat and being driven hard already for many laps, and riding on tires with a fair amount of running on them, the lap timer flashes 1 minute, 29.8 seconds as Pilgrim crosses the line. Info pulled from the onboard -- and must-have for track drivers -- Cosworth-developed Performance Data Recorder’s telemetry shows a 1.5 lateral-g spike. Consider: a Camaro Z/28.R’s pole-position time at Road Atlanta for October’s IMSA Continental Tire Challenge Series race was 1:31.6 -- and the Z06’s lap time puts it within three seconds of the slowest qualifier, an Audi R8 LMS, in this year’s Petit Le Mans’ GT Daytona class at the same circuit.
Yes, I agree, but you seem to be forgetting how great a car the C6Z06 was/is. My point is that yes, the c7Z is putting up great numbers, but it's not anything special when compared to its predecessor. The .3 is referring to the fact that an auto c7z is only 3 tenths faster in the 1/4 mile than the outgoing manual model. If the C6Z came in an auto, they may even be dead even.
And to your second point....Really? The jump from GM cars in the early 90s to early 2000s was much larger than this current jump. We are talking about comparing TPI corvettes to a C5Z06. A jump in performance doesn't get any better than that.
I dunno. Three tenths of a second on essentially the street is pretty impressive when the car is already extremely quick, and especially with rear-wheel drive. Curious to see what it's going to do on a sticky dragstrip.