follow_along_with_video_below_to_see_how_to_install_our_site_as_web_app
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
It hit 60 mph in 4.5 seconds and covered the quarter-miles in 12.8 seconds at 112.8 mph. in a 3,900-pound sedan.
Read more: 2014 Cadillac CTS Vsport Premium review notes, specs, photos, pricing - Autoweek
Follow us: @AutoweekUSA on Twitter | AutoweekUSA on Facebook
and the XTS V-sport for good measure.
70k holy fuck
other mid-sized luxury sedans with 420hp that cost less.
go!
Car and Driver magazine hustled the Vsport from a stop to 60 m.p.h. in 4.4 seconds, achieved 0.97 g’s of tire grip on a skid pad and brought the Caddy from 70 m.p.h. to a halt in just 149 feet. Those are all numbers more in line with a sports car than a two-ton luxury sedan
I'm assuming the 70k price tag was as tested with some extra options. For less you get the best: BMW 550i $63,900 with some room to buy more options. 445hp twin turbo V8. The V-Sport starts at 60k though. So the arguably much better 550i, the flagship of the entire executive level sedan market is a mere $4000 more. That's trouble for GM.
I might see 1 CTS for every 100 new face lifted 2014 5 series I see and there's a reason for that. People won't pay the same money for a Cadillac as a BMW or an Audi.
If you're going to compete with Audi, BMW and Mercedes you either need to offer a substantially better all around product for the same price or you need to offer the same product for substantially less. Nobody will pay the same amount for a Cadillac that they would for the equivalent BMW because it's "just as good" or even marginally better. This car is incredibly bad-ass but it's up against some steep competition. I'd go with the 550i over this without batting an eye and it's not because I'm a BMW fanboy.
that's a hell of a lot of performance for a $59,000 luxury car.