đź“° Auto News Holy crap: GM offers to buy out the ENTIRE UAW

Mook

Mr. Manager
Staff member
Admin
May 23, 2007
207,115
118,728
Elgin
Real Name
Mike
:eek3:

http://money.cnn.com/2008/02/12/news/companies/gm/index.htm?cnn=yes

GM offers buyouts to 74,000
Auto giant aims to replace much of U.S. workforce with lower-paid new hires, dangling $140,000 buyouts to UAW members to stem North American losses.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- In an effort to shave ongoing losses, General Motors offered lucrative buyouts Tuesday to 74,000 employees - its entire U.S. hourly workforce.

The nation's largest automaker announced the latest round of buyouts as it reported another loss on its core auto operations in the fourth quarter, which combined with charges taken earlier in the year left GM (GM, Fortune 500) with a company-record $38.7 billion net loss for 2007.

To try to stem automotive losses that have dogged the company since 2005, the company is making a range of offers, up to cash payments of $140,000 to the remaining 74,000 GM workers represented by the United Auto Workers union.

The goal is not to reduce headcount but rather to bring in new workers at a lower cost.

About 46,000 of the GM employees are eligible to retire today and they can take pension incentives worth between $45,000 to $62,500 to retire.

In addition there are inducements for those who are within five years of retirement to leave early and receive benefits.

Those who leave and agree to sever all ties with the company - including giving up lucrative pension and health care coverage - will receive a lump sum of $140,000 if they have 10 years of service. They will receive $70,000 if they have less than 10 years of service.

"We've worked with our UAW partners to ensure our employees have a variety of attractive options to consider," GM Chairman and CEO Rick Wagoner said in a statement. "The special attrition program is an important initiative that will help us transform the workforce."

The savings GM is likely to see with this offer are substantial. The Center for Automotive Research estimates that by 2011 GM's hourly workforce will be only 8% smaller than current levels - but more than four out 10 of those workers will be new hires being paid a lower wage rate.

The current veteran UAW member at GM today has an average base wage of $28.12 an hour, but the cost of benefits, including pension and future retiree health care costs, nearly triples the cost to GM to $78.21, according to the Center for Automotive Research.

By comparison, new hires will be paid between $14 and $16.23 an hour. And even as they start to accumulate raises tied to seniority, the far less lucrative benefit package will limit GM's cost for those employees to $25.65 an hour.

Lucrative buyout packages are not new at GM (GM, Fortune 500) and rival U.S. automakers Ford Motor (F, Fortune 500) and Chrysler LLC. GM offered similar deals to all its U.S. workers in 2006. That package helped it pare U.S. hourly employment by nearly 40,000 in the past two years.

Ford and Chrysler also have the provision in their new contracts to pay new hires less in salary and benefits. But their workforces are not nearly as old as the UAW membership at GM, so they may end up seeing less turnover in their hourly staff.

Ford has its own buyout offer out to all its remaining 54,000 hourly U.S. workers. The proposal was announced last month when the company reported a fourth-quarter loss. Privately owned Chrysler has offered buyout packages to hourly employees at targeted plants, but has not make a companywide offer.
Fourth-quarter results

GM unveiled its latest cost-cutting moves as it reported a narrow profit of $46 million, or 8 cents a share, excluding special items, in the fourth quarter.

The adjusted earnings were far better than the loss of 54 cents a share that analysts surveyed by earnings tracker Thomson First Call had forecast, but worse than the year-ago result of a $180 million profit, or 32 cents a share.

But the profit in the most recent quarter was due primarily to a $1.6 billion tax benefit. GM would have otherwise lost about $2.75 a share in the period excluding items, although First Call and analysts are not likely to exclude that gain when comparing results to forecasts.

Including special items, the company reported a quarterly net loss of $722 million, or $1.28 a share. That compares to net income of $950 million, or $1.68 a share, it posted in the year-ago period.

Concerns by traders that the company's actual performance was worse than it seemed at first blush sent shares down 1.7% in pre-market trading. But shares swung to a gain of 1.5% in late-morning trading after the company's call discussing its results and outlook in more detail.

The company saw strong vehicle sales, as automotive revenue hit a record $46.7 billion, easily topping forecasts of $44.4 billion. But the company's automotive profit-loss performance took a step backwards most of its regions around the globe.

The company posted a $803 million fourth quarter pretax loss in its auto unit, compared to a narrow $8 million profit on that basis a year earlier. The worsening performance was due to its core North American operations, where industrywide sales were weak in the period. North American plants lost $1.06 billion in the period on that basis, compared to only a $129 million loss a year earlier.

The company also saw pretax losses grow in its European operations and profits decline in the Asia-Pacific region that has become increasingly important for the company's fortunes. But improved pretax profits in GM's Latin America-Africa-Middle East region more than balanced out the worsening performance in the other overseas regions.
 

Turk

Lt. Ron "Slider" Kerner
TCG Premium
Jan 21, 2008
28,518
7,969
Unions are are UnAmerican so I guess that makes you UnAmerican Hulk. I thought this country was about free trade, may the best man win. Combination of lowest price and best quality usually wins the bid, but not in the case of the union. These people don't even "work" in a sense, they watch machines all day and get paid over $70 an hour? Without a union you could probably pay Joe Shmo off the street $30 an hour and he'd be ecstatic about it! He'd also be able to afford to buy a GM himself since the decrease in wages would directly decrease the cost of the car itself. Unions = suck.
 

Theautoguy

TCG Elite Member
Nov 10, 2007
2,312
4
Machesney Park, IL
Some unions like the UAW are outdated and the purpose for their creation is no longer there due to labor laws over the past 50-60 years. However, unions were essential to establish a worker's rights 100 years ago when American big business was built on the backs of vertual slave and underage labor!

Personally I take offense when I run across some inbreed, broom pushing mouth-breather making making twice as much as me when I spent the time, energy and finances to get myself an MBA and build over 10 years into my company and career!

The unions associated with teachers, truck drivers, Postal workers, etc., are still pertinant where you're looking at small localized groups working for much larger institutions; singularly they would be at the mercy of and subjected to the politics of corporation they work for but combining these small groups together into a collective union creates a singular voice credible enough for said corporations to notice. In these situations a union protects the little guy.
 

James

TCG Elite Member
Jan 18, 2008
1,951
0
So after 30+ years at the same job none of you would expect to be making $28 an hour, have health benefits, job security, or a pension when you retire.

Retards.:bowrofl:

I guess you'll be happy to work at Walmart the rest of your life then.:ugh2:
 
Last edited:

SRT41320

TCG Elite Member
TCG Sponsor
Jun 11, 2007
8,307
1,023
Lake in the Hills - IL
i really hate most unions - i will admit that there are some union workers that actually earn the money - but way more then that actually work. i really wish they would get rid of unions. most unions i deal with just end up making the workers lazy because now they have an excuse to say..."look at my contract...it doesnt say anything about sweeping the floor..." im so sick of that. i deal with it pretty much on a daily basis and i think that its just another reason y i hate my job. pretty sad when i only make around $20/hr to install, service, and do training on laser cutting machines but yet the union worker im training to push a couple buttons makes over $25/hr sometimes even $30/hr....i hate most unions!!! fuck them and fuck you if you have a problem with it....have a nice day!
 

bluzohh6

The system works
Jul 2, 2007
10,687
163
Elgin, IL
James thats kind of a stupid statement, 28 dollars per hour is a lot easier to swallow that 78 dollars per hour don't you think? Even after 30 years of pushing a broom or a button, thats just excessive. And that walmart comment, I don't think anyone works there or is aspiring to work there. Not to mention I think I would kill myself if I worked somewhere for 30 years and ONLY made 52,000 dollars. whos the retard? think about it............
 
Old Thread: Hello . There have been no replies in this thread for 90 days.
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant. Consider starting a new thread to get fresh replies.

Thread Info