User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 03-11-2009, 10:50 AM   #1
Mook's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Elgin
Posts: 160,967
 
Mook's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Elgin
Posts: 160,967
Casino cash: $204327000
36.00 per day
Default Edmunds Comparison Test: 2010 Ford Mustang GT vs. 2009 Nissan 370Z

Two Legends Face Off
By Jason Kavanagh, Engineering Editor



When we last left the 2009 Nissan 370Z, it had just laid a drubbing on BMW's little 135i. We then proclaimed, "The 2009 Nissan 370Z raises the standard for the sport coupe segment to a new level of affordable excellence."

Time to get more serious. It's V8 time. Who's in? Let's see, no Camaro, and a Challenger is not available (don't ask), so that leaves the freshly updated 2010 Ford Mustang GT, a car whose very existence is predicated upon wallet-friendly performance.

Perhaps a reinvigorated veteran can take down the newly crowned king. The particulars might differ — four seats versus two, V8 versus V6 — but the mission is the same. And the 2009 Nissan 370Z and 2010 Ford Mustang GT are priced closer than you might think.

Line 'Em Up
We tested a 2010 Ford Mustang GT Premium Coupe outfitted with the Track Pack, which includes revised dampers, a shorter 3.73:1 axle ratio, a limited-slip differential, better brakes, 19-inch wheels, wider summer performance tires and a few suspension underpinnings pilfered from the Shelby GT500. Add in comfort items and other non-performance options and our tester rings up to $34,775.

As before, our 2009 Nissan 370Z Touring stands in the opposite corner, fresh from our long-term test fleet. It wears the Sport package, which adds bigger brakes, a manual transmission with rev-matching shifting capability, a limited-slip diff, and 19-inch wheels and wider rubber. Our 370Z is also equipped with a $1,850 navigation system that Ford offers but our test car lacks, and its MSRP just crests $40 large at $40,320.

Bottom line, we've essentially gathered the most expensive versions of both cars. Not by choice, it just worked out that way. But they can both be bought for less, much less, and with all their good go-fast parts. In other words, there are cheaper versions of these cars that will perform the same as these loaded examples, only without a few comfort extras. The base price on a Mustang GT Premium is $30,995, while a 370Z starts at $29,930. Add the Track Package to the Mustang and your MSRP is $32,494. Add the Sport Package to the Z and you're looking at $33,625.

But is the new 370Z really worth more than the new Mustang in an economy as brutal as this one? We aimed to find out.

The Light Goes Green
Go ahead; pick a car, any car. Both of them will reach 60 mph in 5.2 seconds (4.9 seconds with 1 foot of rollout like on a drag strip). Similarly, the Z runs the quarter in 13.5 seconds at 103.7 mph and the Mustang a nearly identical 13.5 at 102.9 mph. If their straight-line performance was any closer we'd have to start splitting atoms to measure the difference. And before you ask, we filled the Mustang with premium (91 octane) fuel, which Ford says fattens up the torque curve without affecting the peak.

The difference between the two lies in the power delivery. With better gearing and less weight, the 3,374-pound 370Z's speed sneaks up on you. The 7,500-rpm reach of its 3.7-liter V6 is far around the tachometer dial, and there are no flat spots in the power delivery all the way up to the 332-horsepower peak at 7,000 rpm.

However, the coarse sounds and vibration of this V6 mean you have to grit your teeth and force yourself to keep the throttle floored past 6,000 rpm. Like other Nissans equipped with this powertrain, the din is accompanied by a gearlever that sizzles frantically with high-frequency vibration. We're fans of earlier iterations of Nissan's VQ-Series V6, but the 370Z's VQ37HR could use some finishing school.

If you're cynical, the 2010 Ford Mustang's three-valve 4.6-liter V8 can be thought of as a weaponized version of an engine that dates back nearly a decade and a half (though not that much further than the VQ-Series V6, really). Yet this mill doesn't betray its age willingly. The benefits of continuous improvement are evident in its tractability and willingness to run happily on regular-grade 87 octane fuel.

The 315-hp Mustang's V8 doesn't two-by-four you in the chest when you mat the throttle off idle and then fall on its face, wheezing like some pony car of old. Instead, the torque is soft down low, stacking up progressively as the revs pile on. It needs to be above 3,000 rpm before the V8 starts cashing the checks written by its intake note.

And it is some intake note — Ford has done a stupendous job of replicating the gloriously guttural bark of 1960s-era Mustangs, and it renders the Z's grating high-rpm warble that much more intolerable. The urge to scale and descend the Mustang's rev range just to savor it is irresistible.

A Bend in the Road
Despite the Track Pack's shorter 3.73:1 rear end, the 3,572-pound Mustang is still geared too tall. This dulls the V8's snappiness, an impression exacerbated by the Mustang's overly soft engine mounts. As a result, driveline lash is a companion at low speeds. Pay close attention and you can also feel the powertrain lurching about during quick transient handling maneuvers, such as rapid lane changes.

With that said, the Mustang's initial turn into a corner is immediate, almost disconcertingly so since the steering is lifeless and doesn't build effort commensurate with the movements of the chassis. The new car is an improvement over previous Mustangs, but it doesn't hold a candle to the way the 2009 Nissan 370Z responds to steering inputs.

No review involving the 2010 Ford Mustang would be complete without addressing the live axle. It has its benefits for launching and on billiard-table-smooth road-racing tracks, yet makes its compromises known to you in the real world far too often. Years of development still haven't reversed physics, and you're reminded of this every time the Mustang's rear end encounters a bump and pitches you vertically like a toddler on a parent's knee.

Find a blemish-free stretch of tarmac and the Mustang is an engaging companion, though we expected the Track Pack to be a bit sharper in controlling roll and pitch. The balance is there, though, as long as you let the chassis take a set. Then you can easily transition between steady-state understeer and easily controllable throttle steer. It's fun in the hooligan way that Mustangs have always been, just with a bit more control than before.

Hard braking with the Mustang results in a lot of nose dive and some seriously rapid deceleration — it comes to a halt from 60 mph in just 107 feet, which betters the performance turned in by the Z by just a foot. It's the Z's binders we lust after, though — unlike the Mustang, the 370's pedal feel is consistently solid whether you're strafing the canyons or crawling in gridlock.

Stretching the Gap
If the 2010 Mustang proves a surprisingly capable handler, then the Z is nevertheless in another galaxy. You can see this in the way the 370Z grips harder on the skid pad at 0.94g to the Mustang's 0.91g, but the differences in capability are more prominently evidenced in the slalom. Here, the Z changes direction with more immediacy, returning a 72-mph slalom speed to the Mustang's 68.4 mph.

Putting aside the numbers, you get the first clue of the Z's sporting intent before you're even moving. The steering wheel's sculpted grips hint at what's to come when you bend the car through a chicane. The 370Z's helm is a revelation, quicker and far more precise than the Mustang, with a sporting heft and a chatty nature. Cornering loads build in direct proportion to the steering wheel input angle in a way that's intuitive and confidence-inspiring. You'd be hard-pressed to find better steering anywhere. Jump into the 370Z after wheeling the Mustang and you'll wonder why the Mustang is so sloppy.

The Z's responses are devoid of slack, yet this focus doesn't have the usual tradeoff of a jolting ride. This is a chassis that never needs to take a set — the Z is always poised.

Then there's SynchroRev Match, a feature that every automaker ought to be scrambling to try to replicate. Not only does it let you focus on your braking points when you're driving with full commitment, it also aids in providing engine braking in the crush of traffic. Simply put, it's the most brilliant enhancement to doing it manually since the blow-up doll.

That's not to say that the 370Z's transmission does everything perfectly. Upshifts suffer from a slightly sticky gearchange and the clutch takeup could be more progressive. These aren't showstoppers, but nailing details like these would propel the Z to the sports car elite.

Living in Style
Noticeable improvements in materials quality and NVH were part of the 2010 Ford Mustang's design brief, and you can see it in the soft-touch dashboard materials and hear it in the lack of road and wind noise.

Yet certain aspects of the Mustang's cabin frustrate us — its retro-style gauges belong back in the 1960s, as they're not only illegible but also are prone to being obscured by stray reflections. The cruise control interface was crummy a decade ago. Plus, the steering wheel is too large and its clunky spokes discourage optimum nine-and-three hand placement. But, hey, you can choose from hundreds of different interior lighting color schemes. Really, when it comes to design nuances in a performance car, this isn't what we had in mind.

On the plus side, there's a sense of spaciousness in the Mustang that the Z-car can't match, and the Ford's seats are more comfortable than the Z's, if not quite as supportive. And practicality is a no-brainer — the Mustang has rear seats, and small as they are, this fact alone goes a long way toward daily-driver viability.

If you shied away from the plasticky 350Z, fear not the 370Z. The 2009 Nissan 370Z's cabin is finished to a much higher standard, with synthetic suede and high-quality trimmings. There are lots of gauges and they're all legible, the centerpiece being a huge tachometer that dominates the instrument cluster like the eye of Cyclops.

At the same time, the Z-car is a much more intimate place than the Mustang's cabin, so make sure you shower before picking up your date (don't ask how we know this). You'll also want to be careful when backing out of your beau's driveway, too — that monolithic C-pillar could blot out a Brinks truck.

Wrap Up
Large, gregarious and sporting a fan base of Americans millions strong despite its flaws, the 2010 Ford Mustang is the Rush Limbaugh of cars. It might be outclassed by the 2009 Nissan 370Z, but for many the charms of the Mustang cannot be replaced. At $35 grand, though, the Mustang GT is a tough sell. If you're willing to forgo some amenities, you could have a Mustang GT that performs similarly to our tester for a bit less money. That's the Mustang we'd prefer.



When it comes to delivering the best things about performance cars, the Z-car is a decathlete that leaps higher, throws farther and swims harder than the rest. If you can make the financial stretch for it, the 2009 Nissan 370Z will provide all the stimulus you need.


Full Image Gallery
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do.../photoId=77652

Video
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...deoId=20268899

__________________
- TCG Owner & Operator -
Mook is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 11:26 AM   #2
Bru's Avatar
Bru Bru is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 36,896
Bru
Super Moderator
 
Bru's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 36,896
Casino cash: $2147483647
8.25 per day
Default

I'll take the base 370z with sports package
__________________
Bru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 11:29 AM   #3
radioguy6's Avatar  
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Schaumburg, IL
Posts: 6,832
 
radioguy6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Schaumburg, IL
Posts: 6,832
Casino cash: $31886550
1.66 per day
Default

ill take the 370Z please.
__________________
2017 Infiniti Q50S AWD
radioguy6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 11:33 AM   #4
PANDA's Avatar  
Join Date: May 2007
Location: FRG
Posts: 34,153
 
PANDA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: FRG
Posts: 34,153
Casino cash: $60946500
7.64 per day
Default

Honestly, id take the FORD, that 370Z does not entice me.
__________________
PANDA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 11:35 AM   #5
radioguy6's Avatar  
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Schaumburg, IL
Posts: 6,832
 
radioguy6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Schaumburg, IL
Posts: 6,832
Casino cash: $31886550
1.66 per day
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PANDA View Post
Honestly, id take the FORD, that 370Z does not entice me.
the world has come to an end.
radioguy6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 11:39 AM   #6
UWISHU1's Avatar  
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hanover Park
Posts: 5,103
 
UWISHU1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hanover Park
Posts: 5,103
Casino cash: $9591800
0.94 per day
Default

Ford should be ashamed 315hp V8 pfff I'll take the 332hp V6
__________________
2015 A6 DIB 400A VMP Mustang GT
2000 Buick Regal GSE
UWISHU1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 12:47 PM   #7
Renesis07's Avatar
Forum Sponsor
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Mundelein IL
Posts: 523
Forum Sponsor
 
Renesis07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Mundelein IL
Posts: 523
Casino cash: $5994000
0.14 per day
Default

I would take a 350Z, 370Z's look like ass and the mustang cant corner.
__________________

Chris K - Piemonte Chevrolet - 847-426-2000
2013 GHIG Boss 302
Renesis07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 12:47 PM   #8
Mook's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Elgin
Posts: 160,967
 
Mook's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Elgin
Posts: 160,967
Casino cash: $204327000
36.00 per day
Default

take a look at a 370 in person. i was the same way....until i saw a black one at the dealership. totally changed my mind
Mook is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 12:59 PM   #9
Yaj Yak's Avatar
Harbor Master
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 88,958
Harbor Master
 
Yaj Yak's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 88,958
Casino cash: $155580000
19.90 per day
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UWISHU1 View Post
Ford should be ashamed 315hp V8 pfff I'll take the 332hp V6

exactly. step it up forrrd.
__________________
01 525i
01 turbo pricks
13 gas 3500hd cclb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Outlaw View Post
TCG: We pull vanity fair models in our F150’s because Tesla’s are unsafe.
Yaj Yak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 01:43 PM   #10
KaMaSuTrA's Avatar
Resident Sexi Man
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 1,485
Resident Sexi Man
 
KaMaSuTrA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 1,485
Casino cash: $5202300
0.37 per day
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UWISHU1 View Post
Ford should be ashamed 315hp V8 pfff I'll take the 332hp V6


If you were to say something like this back in the day you'd get stoned but, things have gotten soo sad that it's common for a V6 passing up a V8 in horsepower ratings N/A to N/A...what ever happened to efficiency?!
__________________
The Resident Sexi Man
KaMaSuTrA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 01:44 PM   #11
Mook's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Elgin
Posts: 160,967
 
Mook's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Elgin
Posts: 160,967
Casino cash: $204327000
36.00 per day
Default

vq > all

well, no, but close
Mook is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 01:44 PM   #12
Yaj Yak's Avatar
Harbor Master
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 88,958
Harbor Master
 
Yaj Yak's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 88,958
Casino cash: $155580000
19.90 per day
Default

something that remains unsaid here tho, is potential... I can foresee the 8 having much more potential than the 6.

but out of the box. no comparison.
Yaj Yak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 02:10 PM   #13
radioguy6's Avatar  
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Schaumburg, IL
Posts: 6,832
 
radioguy6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Schaumburg, IL
Posts: 6,832
Casino cash: $31886550
1.66 per day
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by K J View Post
something that remains unsaid here tho, is potential... I can foresee the 8 having much more potential than the 6.

but out of the box. no comparison.
i agree, the mustang will have more mod potential than the 370Z. The VQ37VHR can only squeeze out maybe 20 more rwhp with all bolt-ons and a tune without going FI. Im sure the mustang is much more restrictive too.
radioguy6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 02:13 PM   #14
KaMaSuTrA's Avatar
Resident Sexi Man
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 1,485
Resident Sexi Man
 
KaMaSuTrA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 1,485
Casino cash: $5202300
0.37 per day
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by K J View Post
something that remains unsaid here tho, is potential... I can foresee the 8 having much more potential than the 6.

but out of the box. no comparison.
Thats the whole displacement deal which is true in the long run however stock for stock its kind of embarrassing for the Ford.
KaMaSuTrA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 07:48 PM   #15
IDAFC21's Avatar
WOW.
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Avondale, AZ
Posts: 39,135
WOW.
 
IDAFC21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Avondale, AZ
Posts: 39,135
Casino cash: $113052529
8.75 per day
Default

370Z plz
__________________
2014 ///M235i_____________________________________________ _____2004 Monaro
IDAFC21 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 08:50 PM   #16
The Broken Regal's Avatar
BITE BITE, SIP SIP
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wheaton
Posts: 14,718
BITE BITE, SIP SIP
 
The Broken Regal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wheaton
Posts: 14,718
Casino cash: $18292850
3.32 per day
Default

gimme da 370z plz
The Broken Regal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 09:46 PM   #17
Mickey's Avatar
Look at those low rates!
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Normal, IL
Posts: 3,008
Look at those low rates!
 
Mickey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Normal, IL
Posts: 3,008
Casino cash: $5392635
0.72 per day
Default

The Z's stance just looks mean. It looks like it would just hug tight corners. 332 hp is mighty impressive too. Although the mustang just makes me think fat and nasty burnouts. I like fat and nasty burnouts.
__________________

Uhn tiss uhn tiss uhn tiss baby
Mickey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 08:00 AM   #18
UWISHU1's Avatar  
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hanover Park
Posts: 5,103
 
UWISHU1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hanover Park
Posts: 5,103
Casino cash: $9591800
0.94 per day
Default

click for sickness
UWISHU1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 10:18 AM   #19
TonzKnock-G's Avatar  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Shitcago
Posts: 13,465
 
TonzKnock-G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Shitcago
Posts: 13,465
Casino cash: $19328700
3.06 per day
Default

Love the Vq sound!
__________________
12 Chrysler 300
TonzKnock-G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2009, 01:26 PM   #20
EmersonHart13's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 45,525
Senior Member
 
EmersonHart13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 45,525
Casino cash: $59667000
10.31 per day
Default

2010 Ford Mustang Burnout: Time To Smoke Some SS

By Matt Hardigree, 2:00 PM on Wed Mar 18 2009, 311 views
Remember the 2010 Chevy Camaro burnout? Well, Vaughn and his 2010 Ford Mustang would like to cloud that memory in a bleach-scented fog of tire smoke and testosterone.
The Muscle Car Wars have gone from cold to hot and it looks like Ford wants to send Chevy to the scrap yard. On the way, both would like to send more Challengers to a crusher demise.
[Source: The10Unleashed.com]


http://jalopnik.com/5173854/2010-for...-smoke-some-ss
EmersonHart13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2009, 02:11 PM   #21
KaMaSuTrA's Avatar
Resident Sexi Man
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 1,485
Resident Sexi Man
 
KaMaSuTrA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 1,485
Casino cash: $5202300
0.37 per day
Default

I will admit that the "first ever" Camaro SS burnout was a bit weak, nice job with the Mustang GT even though he kept it sideways and the Camaro didn't.
KaMaSuTrA is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.6 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
no new posts