User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 02-26-2009, 09:51 AM   #1
Mook's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Elgin
Posts: 161,094
 
Mook's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Elgin
Posts: 161,094
Casino cash: $205983000
36.00 per day
Default Edmunds 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 3.8 Track Full Test

Hyundai Builds a Rear-Drive GT
By Erin Riches



Vehicle Tested:
2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 3.8 Track 2dr Coupe (3.8L 6cyl 6M)
MSRP of Test Vehicle: $30,375 Price It!!

What Works:
Feels lightweight and nimble through corners; composed highway ride; 3.8-liter V6's strong torque and bass-tone exhaust note; supportive front seats; unusually good sight lines for a sport coupe.

What Needs Work:
Drivetrain's torque-reduction mode activates on hard upshifts; overboosted steering; no telescoping steering wheel; so-so interior materials; poor access to backseat.

Bottom Line:
Not as hard-edged as some competitors, but Hyundai's sport coupe is easy to drive quickly on a back road, yet compliant enough for everyday use.


Featured Specs
  • 306-horsepower 3.8-liter V6
  • 6-speed manual gearbox
  • 68.2-mph slalom speed

Our 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 3.8 Track is painted Bathurst Black. That's Bathurst as in Bathurst 1000, a 620-mile (1,000-km) race on Australia's Mount Panorama Circuit, a 3.9-mile road course with 23 turns, grades of up to 16 percent and a 1.2-mile-long straightaway named Conrod Straight after a spectacular engine failure endured by racer Frank Kleinig in 1939.

Only heavily modified Ford Falcons and Holden Commodores in the V8 Supercar series (Australia's take on NASCAR) race at Bathurst today, so there's no obvious connection to the unassuming black clearcoat on our V6-equipped 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 3.8 Track.

But as we drive the 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe, we can imagine Hyundai's chassis engineers fine-tuning the ride and handling of their first rear-wheel-drive coupe on the demanding Bathurst circuit. Probably the cost constraints of building a $30,000 car don't allow for working holidays Down Under. Yet the 2010 Genesis Coupe isn't some soggy two-door version of the Hyundai Genesis luxury sedan.

Instead you'll find a very capable chassis underneath the 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 3.8 Track's arresting bodywork. Hyundai's sport coupe might not be track-ready out of the box, but it doesn't wither when we pitch it into Bathurst-like turns on lumpy two-lane roads.

More GT Than Track
Of course, with "Track" in its name, you expect the 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 3.8 Track to have an edge to it, as if its chassis has been tuned to the limits of its potential.

But on back roads and at our test track, our Bathurst Black coupe is easygoing almost to a fault. Perhaps Hyundai executives weren't quite comfortable with the idea of sending a true track-day weapon down the assembly line. After all, even in basic trim, the 2010 Genesis Coupe is the highest-performance car the company has ever built.

So think of the Track, which is the top trim level on U.S.-market 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupes, as a sport package. For a starting price of $30,250, our 3.8 Track comes with higher-rate springs, firmer dampers and stiffer antiroll bars than the base Genesis 3.8 and 3.8 Grand Touring models. And then there are the 19-inch wheels with 225/40R19 front and 245/40R19 rear Bridgestone Potenza RE050A summer tires, a Brembo brake kit with fixed four-piston calipers at each corner, a Torsen limited-slip rear differential, and a front strut-tower brace.



Come late March, you'll also be able to get the 2.0T Track, which combines all of the above with the turbocharged four-cylinder engine, or the Genesis R-Spec coupe ($24,500), which is a 2.0T Track, less trivialities like a sunroof, spoiler, foglights, Bluetooth, cruise control, trip computer and metallic interior trim.

Poking Its Soft Underbelly

The R-Spec will be the lightest of the 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupes and as such, likely the best starting point for track use.

Yet the first thing we notice about our 3.8 Track coupe is just how light and unencumbered it feels transitioning through turns on Lake Hughes Road. Remember we're talking about a rear-drive V6 coupe with a 111-inch wheelbase, a 63-inch front track and a 63.6-inch rear track.

It tips Inside Line's scales at 3,488 pounds versus the 3,549 pounds we quoted for the Korean-market version. The similarly sized Infiniti G37 weighs 3,715, while the Nissan 370Z, which is 15 inches shorter, weighs 3,359 pounds.

Compared to not only these coupes but also the similarly priced BMW 128i, the 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 3.8 Track reacts to your inputs in slower, softer fashion. Although decently weighted for most situations, the steering feels a bit dull and overboosted when you're running hard. And although the Genesis coupe's 68.2-mph slalom speed is respectable, the others range from 1 mph faster through the cones (128i) to a full 3 mph faster (G37).



Similarly, the 3.8 Track coupe's Brembo brakes are effective, stopping the coupe in 111 feet from 60 mph at our test track. However, pedal bite is less immediate than we'd like on a car with those famous red calipers.

Can't Keep a Good Car Down
Still, there's no denying that this 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe turns in like no other Hyundai before it, and does so with far less body roll besides.

There's also no denying that the Genesis coupe is simply a fun car. From the laterally supportive driver seat, you can tell there's ample front-tire grip, so you get back on the throttle early to tease out the tail. Certainly, you can throttle-steer any rear-wheel-drive car, but not many make it feel this accessible and safe.

We think of Bathurst as the Genesis coupe stays composed over midcorner bumps. Our test car doesn't fidget much over the grooved concrete slabs of L.A. freeways, either — an about-face from the poor ride we observed on Korean highways. Perhaps these Bridgestones are better than the KDM Hankooks. Or perhaps Hyundai has retuned the suspension.





Excellent sight lines are rare in coupes, yet the Genesis has a good view in all directions, so no excuses for not looking far down the road and no need for the 3.8 Grand Touring's back-up sensors. Were it not for the lack of a telescoping steering wheel, the driving position would be perfect, too.

Hyundai's 3.8-Liter V6 Reinvented
Although it's agreeable enough in the Azera and the Genesis sedan, we never would have imagined that Hyundai's workaday 3.8-liter V6 could work in a performance car. But it does. And in addition to a long, flat torque band, it has a big, hairy, lovable exhaust note.

Of course, 306 horsepower at 6,300 rpm and 266 pound-feet of torque at 4,700 rpm don't come free, and Hyundai has made extensive changes to its double-overhead-cam V6.

As in the Genesis sedan, this V6 has variable intake and exhaust valve timing and a two-stage intake manifold. However, Hyundai altered the intake to meet the tidier packaging requirements and higher performance thresholds for the 2010 Genesis Coupe. The new exhaust system is less restrictive, and the engine calibration is revised, undoubtedly to improve top-end performance.



In addition, the crankshaft and connecting rods are lighter, benefiting both performance and fuel-efficiency. To help the engine withstand nontraditional Hyundai drivers, wider crankshaft journals, a thicker engine block and piston-cooling oil jets have also been fitted.

The V6 comes with either a six-speed manual or a six-speed automatic transmission. You can rip off snappy downshifts with the manual gearbox, and what it lacks in direct mechanical feel, it makes up for in day-to-day ease of use.

But Hyundai Doesn't Quite Trust Us
At our test track, the 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 3.8 Track hits 60 mph in 6.4 seconds (or 6.1 seconds with 1 foot of rollout as on a drag strip) and goes through the quarter-mile in 14.5 seconds at 97.9 mph.

Those numbers are fine, but short of Hyundai's "under 6 seconds" 0-60 claim and suspiciously pokey for a car with more than 300 hp. The overweight G37 is over half a second quicker through the quarter-mile at 13.8 seconds at 102 mph, even with 330 hp at its command. Also consider that the 128i, which is 300 pounds lighter than the Genesis but down 76 hp, easily keeps up, recording a 14.3-second quarter-mile at 96.5 mph.

It's impossible to say exactly why the Genesis coupe isn't putting up better numbers. But we do know that there's a torque-reduction feature on this car that would suck some of the fun out of Conrod Straight. Accelerate hard in 1st gear and then do a hard upshift to 2nd at or just before the marked 6,500-rpm redline. You'll get your upshift, but as the revs drop back, you'll feel an additional, artificial cut in power. It lasts for about 3 seconds.



Hyundai says this is a drivetrain protection measure that's triggered at 6,800 rpm (the engine's true redline). However, the car's tachometer lags behind actual engine rpm, so it takes trial and error to find a shift point that keeps you out of the protection zone. Oddly enough, you don't get any intervention until you actually complete your upshift — you can ride the engine to the rev limiter with impunity.

"There's some talk about minimizing the delay, so that it's maybe just a second, but nothing has been signed off," Miles Johnson, Hyundai communications manager, tells us. "The car is going to market with the 3-second calibration."

Even a 1-second delay compromises acceleration, though. Moreover, the automatic torque reduction makes it difficult to get a smooth gearchange at even two-thirds throttle, as it exacerbates the drivetrain lash already present due to the Genesis coupe's soft engine mounts.

Seriously Good for $30K
Although the 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 3.8 Track's torque-reduction feature drives us up the wall, it's hardly surprising that automakers' executives are nervous given the recent controversy surrounding the Nissan GT-R's transmission.

And, really, this is the one major flaw on a car that's otherwise easy to drive quickly on back roads, yet refined enough not to be annoying during your commute. Would we prefer sharper overall reflexes? Definitely, and the aftermarket should see to that.

It's also true that we might ultimately prefer the more athletic engine and purer handling of the BMW 128i. But it would probably be tougher to get a 128i the way we want it (i.e., with the Sport package) without straying from the $30,000 mark. And for $30K, there isn't a better rear-drive sport coupe than the 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 3.8 Track. Well, at least not until we try the R-Spec.


Full Image Gallery
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do.../photoId=76630

__________________
- TCG Owner & Operator -
Mook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 10:05 AM   #2
The Broken Regal's Avatar
BITE BITE, SIP SIP
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wheaton
Posts: 14,718
BITE BITE, SIP SIP
 
The Broken Regal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wheaton
Posts: 14,718
Casino cash: $18292850
3.31 per day
Default

LOL if you spend like 1k more on top of it you'll have a better car than the coupe with a 128i haha but hey, if thats their budget then thats cool

Looks like a solid performer, but really cant wait to see how the i4 turbo r-spec after a little bit of aftermarket stuff will cut into sales of the 3.8
The Broken Regal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 10:05 AM   #3
UWISHU1's Avatar  
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hanover Park
Posts: 5,105
 
UWISHU1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hanover Park
Posts: 5,105
Casino cash: $9616800
0.94 per day
Default

impressive not GTR impressive but impressive non the less a sweet vid would be nice, damn them seats are SEXY!!
__________________
2015 A6 DIB 400A VMP Mustang GT
2000 Buick Regal GSE
UWISHU1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 10:11 AM   #4
Bru's Avatar
Bru Bru is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 36,906
Bru
Super Moderator
 
Bru's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 36,906
Casino cash: $2147483647
8.25 per day
Default

They must classify a sports coupe as something different than an actual sports car, hence why there's no comparison between the $30,000 370Z. Unfortunately, if someone has a budget of $30,000, the Z will likely be a competing car so they should have addressed that. The back seats on the Genesis are useless anyways.
__________________
Bru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 11:31 AM   #5
Mr Baytchos's Avatar  
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hampshire, IL
Posts: 6,428
 
Mr Baytchos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hampshire, IL
Posts: 6,428
Casino cash: $19308800
1.45 per day
Default

Nice...but after reading that the 2.0t r spec definetly sounds like a better deal. put the 5 grand you are saving into it and it will prolly be faster and better handling the the 3.8
Mr Baytchos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 11:34 AM   #6
Bru's Avatar
Bru Bru is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 36,906
Bru
Super Moderator
 
Bru's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 36,906
Casino cash: $2147483647
8.25 per day
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Baytchos View Post
Nice...but after reading that the 2.0t r spec definetly sounds like a better deal. put the 5 grand you are saving into it and it will prolly be faster and better handling the the 3.8
Bru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 12:08 PM   #7
Smoke's Avatar  
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 632
 
Smoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 632
Casino cash: $4716100
0.16 per day
Default

I'd imagine the 3.8 will be the better car if you're getting the Genesis right away-the 4-cylinder won't be a good performance buy until the aftermarket catches up with safe and tested go-fast parts.

IMO I'm more interested in what the car can do without its 'tourqe-management' style limiter.Something the aftermarket needs to adress asap.
__________________

Wise men lay up knowledge,but the mouth of the foolish is a present destruction -Proverbs 10:14
Smoke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 12:27 PM   #8
The Broken Regal's Avatar
BITE BITE, SIP SIP
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wheaton
Posts: 14,718
BITE BITE, SIP SIP
 
The Broken Regal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wheaton
Posts: 14,718
Casino cash: $18292850
3.31 per day
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smoke View Post
I'd imagine the 3.8 will be the better car if you're getting the Genesis right away-the 4-cylinder won't be a good performance buy until the aftermarket catches up with safe and tested go-fast parts.

IMO I'm more interested in what the car can do without its 'tourqe-management' style limiter.Something the aftermarket needs to adress asap.
dont feel like im just constantly following all your posts cause im not, but you just say some off the wall stuff

the i4 is gonna be a hit cause its already IC'd and turbo'd from the factory and as already said, its a HECK of a better deal... lol @ safe and tested, not when the tuners get ahold of the car!

the aftermarket does not need to address the torq-mang, that should be something immediately changed by hyundai, cause with it engaged, the car isnt coming close to the claims they are making on its power in stock form
The Broken Regal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 01:05 PM   #9
Smoke's Avatar  
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 632
 
Smoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 632
Casino cash: $4716100
0.16 per day
Default

Eh,if Hyundai won't do it,someone else will.It doesn't bode well for trans durability if they have to limit the output.

Until the 2.0T comes out with times we honestly don't know whether its a better deal or not.Given that Hyundai is pitching its 3.8 coupe at the top of the lineup,its doubtful they'll undercut themselves with a 4-cylinder that beats it stock.As time goes on the aftermarket will reveal power gains on that engine,but *right away* the 3.8 will be the better performing car.
Keep in mind ,the ugly truth is that most of these cars will be sold to chicks who think the Z is too small and need something faster than their college beater Tiburon.Us gearheads don't make a huge percentage of buyers with cars like these.
Smoke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 01:10 PM   #10
Yaj Yak's Avatar
Harbor Master
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 89,109
Harbor Master
 
Yaj Yak's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 89,109
Casino cash: $157150000
19.92 per day
Default

get em kevy.
__________________
01 525i
01 turbo pricks
13 gas 3500hd cclb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Outlaw View Post
TCG: We pull vanity fair models in our F150’s because Tesla’s are unsafe.
Yaj Yak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 01:11 PM   #11
Yaj Yak's Avatar
Harbor Master
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 89,109
Harbor Master
 
Yaj Yak's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 89,109
Casino cash: $157150000
19.92 per day
Default

too expensive IMO... you can get such better shit for that sort of money.
Yaj Yak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 01:15 PM   #12
Smoke's Avatar  
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 632
 
Smoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 632
Casino cash: $4716100
0.16 per day
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by K J View Post
too expensive IMO... you can get such better shit for that sort of money.
Agreed.Dont used Evo's run about 30K?
Smoke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 01:17 PM   #13
Yaj Yak's Avatar
Harbor Master
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 89,109
Harbor Master
 
Yaj Yak's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 89,109
Casino cash: $157150000
19.92 per day
Default

cheaper than that for used...

i was more talking new cars.

mustang gt...
challenger...
128i...
wrx...

shit a v6 camaro's gonna out perform this turdbox right?
Yaj Yak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 03:25 PM   #14
Mr Baytchos's Avatar  
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hampshire, IL
Posts: 6,428
 
Mr Baytchos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hampshire, IL
Posts: 6,428
Casino cash: $19308800
1.45 per day
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smoke View Post

Until the 2.0T comes out with times we honestly don't know whether its a better deal or not.Given that Hyundai is pitching its 3.8 coupe at the top of the lineup,its doubtful they'll undercut themselves with a 4-cylinder that beats it stock.
take a look at VW with the GTI and the .:R32 about the same with price points and the GTI wasn't even a half second slower to 60 especially if equiped with the DSG tranny.

It will most likely be slower but not that much slower. it's gonna be lighter and once you throw a chip on it I would put money on it beating the v6
Mr Baytchos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 03:27 PM   #15
Mr Baytchos's Avatar  
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hampshire, IL
Posts: 6,428
 
Mr Baytchos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hampshire, IL
Posts: 6,428
Casino cash: $19308800
1.45 per day
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by K J View Post
cheaper than that for used...

i was more talking new cars.

mustang gt...
challenger...
128i...
wrx...

shit a v6 camaro's gonna out perform this turdbox right?
I dont think the stang, challenger or camaro would out perform this car in the twisties.
Mr Baytchos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 03:39 PM   #16
Smoke's Avatar  
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 632
 
Smoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 632
Casino cash: $4716100
0.16 per day
Default

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...take_road_test

According to that article, the 4 cylinder Genesis shares the block,cams, and crank with the current Mitsu Evo due to them being both 'global engines'.Hurm....the possibilities....

The current 0-60 is 7 seconds stock, so its pretty much a dead-heat with the V6.
Smoke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 03:44 PM   #17
RebelTJ's Avatar
Coyote Bus Lines
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Rockford
Posts: 7,791
Coyote Bus Lines
 
RebelTJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Rockford
Posts: 7,791
Casino cash: $452761705
1.92 per day
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mook View Post
it's got a 3800 so it's GOD, right?
__________________

2000 Jeep Wrangler Sahara Edition - 4.0L, 5 Speed - Equinsu Ocha
1996 Dodge Intrepid ES 3.5L w/Performance Handling Package (The broken Turdbox)
Gone but not forgotten:
2002 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP 40th Anniversary Ed. (Gone 11/15/2014)
1984 Chevy Camaro Sport Coupe A4 w/LC1 (Gone 02/20/2011)
1995 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP (Gone 08/2008)


TCG's Resident Transportation Expert
RebelTJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 06:10 PM   #18
Yaj Yak's Avatar
Harbor Master
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 89,109
Harbor Master
 
Yaj Yak's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 89,109
Casino cash: $157150000
19.92 per day
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Baytchos View Post
I dont think the stang, challenger or camaro would out perform this car in the twisties.

i dont turn.
Yaj Yak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 07:12 PM   #19
bikrboy128's Avatar
Some say.....
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wheaton
Posts: 10,613
Some say.....
 
bikrboy128's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wheaton
Posts: 10,613
Casino cash: $27412645
2.40 per day
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by K J View Post
i dont turn.
you powerslide?
__________________
06 M6 GTO - stock garage queen - sold
12 Acura MDX - winter beater
03 Honda S2000 - 100 grand under the hood
05 Kawasaki STX-15f - braaap
79 Kawasaki KZ750 vertical twin - old and slow
82 Honda VF750 Magna - old and slightly faster
bikrboy128 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 07:37 PM   #20
Yaj Yak's Avatar
Harbor Master
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 89,109
Harbor Master
 
Yaj Yak's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 89,109
Casino cash: $157150000
19.92 per day
Default

i drift.
Yaj Yak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 08:15 PM   #21
RebelTJ's Avatar
Coyote Bus Lines
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Rockford
Posts: 7,791
Coyote Bus Lines
 
RebelTJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Rockford
Posts: 7,791
Casino cash: $452761705
1.92 per day
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by K J View Post
i E-Brake drift.
fixed
RebelTJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2011, 11:38 AM   #22
brandonmillsap's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 5
Banned
 
brandonmillsap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 5
Casino cash: $4613800
0.00 per day
Default Re:

The 128i is just sheer beauty. I wouldn't consider other models as of now, in fact I am planning to obtain one in the future.

_______________

Keep it flowing!

Formula Mods: 383, LE2 Heads/Intake, 226/230 cam, 52MM TB, Magnaflow cat back, Brake Disc LT headers, CAI, SFC, Strut Brace, Adj LCA, Adj Panhard, Oil Pan Gasket Set Relocated Torque Arm, Progressive Rate Springs, 2011 BMW 128i Oil Filter Short Throw Shifter
brandonmillsap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2011, 11:39 AM   #23
Turk's Avatar
Lt. Ron "Slider" Kerner
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 25,902
Lt. Ron "Slider" Kerner
 
Turk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 25,902
Casino cash: $34813825
6.12 per day
Default

OK? Why are you talking about a BMW in this thread?
__________________
Current Car
2012 R8 V10
2015 M3
Former Cars
2001 Camaro SS
2007 Audi S4
2008 M3 Blown
2016 WRX
Turk is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2011, 11:57 AM   #24
ilikemtb999's Avatar
I eat dirt
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 68,792
I eat dirt
 
ilikemtb999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 68,792
Casino cash: $736000
15.92 per day
Default

What an odd bump.
__________________
85 blazer.........turbo, 1 ton axles, some stuff
70 Buick GS.......resurrection in progress
10 Tahoe SSV lowered Baja edition
14 Caprice PPV woop woop
ilikemtb999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2011, 04:50 PM   #25
The Italian's Avatar
But not Italian
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 7,331
But not Italian
 
The Italian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 7,331
Casino cash: $14287000
1.74 per day
Default

Damn newbs.
The Italian is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.6 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
no new posts