Edmunds Full-Test - 2014 Cadillac CTS V-Sport Twin Turbo

Mook

Mr. Manager
Staff member
Admin
May 23, 2007
207,174
118,999
Elgin
Real Name
Mike
A 420-Horsepower Blast at the Blue and White Roundel

2014_cadillac_ctsvsport_actburn_ft_826131_717.jpg

Squint and the new CTS bears more than a passing resemblance to a Mercedes E-Class.

Published: 09/16/2013 - by Jason Kavanagh, Engineering Editor

Careening downhill with the gas matted, we bend the 2014 Cadillac CTS Vsport toward a tight right-hander that looms large ahead. We quickly transition to full brakes, converting the twin-turbo V6's speed into heat before easing off and steadying the throttle.

Dial in a bit more steering lock, not too much because this is a late apex. Wait, wait, wait to grab the last bit of berm but don't unwind the wheel yet. Feed in some more throttle, touch the next curb on the right and now aim for the left edge of the approaching rise, and if you've done it right the chassis unloads over the crest just as it hits the apex.

This is the Milford Road Course, informally known as the Lutz Ring, at GM's proving grounds in Michigan, and it's one of the most demanding circuits we've ever driven. Every turn is specifically crafted to test the car in several ways simultaneously. Long, oil sump-straining, sustained-g corners. Turning while braking. Accelerating over crests. Bumpstop-crushing compressions. It's on this track that engineers have honed the new CTS in an unabashed attempt to take the BMW 5 Series head on.

5 Series in Its Sights

2014_cadillac_ctsvsport_actf34_ft_813136_717.jpg


In the past the CTS was a 'tweener, larger than a BMW 3 Series but smaller than the larger 5 Series. With the entry-level ATS now in Cadillac's portfolio, GM engineers had the freedom to size and position the 2014 Cadillac CTS more squarely against the 5 Series. Thus the 2014 CTS is larger than the outgoing generation, stretching 4.2 inches longer and riding on a 1.2-inch-longer wheelbase. It's longer, in fact, than both the 5 Series and Mercedes-Benz E-Class, with a wheelbase that's right between the two.

Whereas the current 5 Series is derived from its larger 7 Series brother, the 2014 CTS is built on the lighter ATS platform. The result is that the 5 Series is porkier than it should be, and the CTS is more efficient with its mass. It's hard to describe the 3,971-pound CTS Vsport as a light car (it's 300 pounds heavier than the base CTS) but it still undercuts the fat 550i by more than 400 pounds.

You might not recognize the Vsport name as it's new to the CTS model lineup. Fret not, as the Vsport is not intended to be a replacement for the CTS-V. Specifically, it slots between the base V6 CTS variant and the inevitable CTS-V, and has the BMW 550i in its sights, not the M5.

Two Turbos and Eight Speeds

2014_cadillac_ctsvsport_actr34_ft_813133_717.jpg


The Vsport's 3.6-liter V6 has had its lungs pumped up with 12 psi of boost by a pair of turbos tucked beneath its cylinder heads. Although sharing its architecture with the normally aspirated version that's found a home in many a GM car over the years, the engine has been comprehensively beefed up for boosted duty.

Direct injection and a short-path liquid-to-air intercooler underpin its 420 horsepower and 430 pound-feet of torque, and it's backed by an all-new paddle-shiftable eight-speed autobox. No manual gearbox is available.

While the Vsport's power eclipses the current 2013 BMW 550i's 400 hp, the refreshed 2014 550i boasts 445 hp. We've only tested the 550i in 400-hp guise, so that's the yardstick for now.

Chassis Prowess

2014_cadillac_ctsvsport_actf34_ft_813138_717.jpg


At GM's Milford Proving Ground we strapped our Vbox into the Vsport and tested its chops on the vast black lake. The conclusion from this exercise is that the 2014 Cadillac CTS Vsport will be a thorn in the side of the big 5 Series. Not only did the Cadillac cling to the skid pad at an eye-opening 0.95g, it tore out a 69.8-mph slalom performance. Braking, too, was impressive, as the Cad reached a drama-free halt from 60 mph in just 103 feet.

There are some differences in the composition of the tarmac here compared to our usual testing venue in Southern California, and our experience with both sites suggests the black lake is somewhat grippier. Nevertheless, these results from the Vsport humiliate the last 550i we tested by a wide margin.

The Vsport's standard summer tires contribute to this prowess. Run-flat Pirelli P Zero Neros measuring 245/40 in front and 275/35 out back have been snapped onto the Vsport's 18-by-8.5-inch wheels (18 by 9.5 inches in the back). By contrast, BMW offers only all-season tires on the 550i, and suffers the consequences in terms of capability. Score one for the home team.

Good tires alone do not a sport sedan make, and the CTS Vsport's chassis brims with sophistication to fully exploit them. Its torque-biasing electronically controlled differential is largely similar to that found on the C7 Corvette, and all Vsports are fitted with GM's latest generation of magnetorheological (MR) dampers.

Power to Weight

2014_cadillac_ctsvsport_actf34_ft_813137_717.jpg


Paired to its 20-hp edge over the 400-hp 2013 550i, the Cadillac's weight advantage suggests another ass-whipping is in store for the BMW when it comes to acceleration. It wasn't to be. The Vsport's 5.1-second sprint to 60 (4.8 seconds with one foot of rollout as on a drag strip) pips the BMW by only a tenth.

Oddly, the Vsport's quarter-mile sprint of 13.3 seconds at 106.3 mph couldn't match the 2013 550i, as the Cadillac trailed by a tenth of a second and 2 mph by the time it cleared the stripe. Trap speed is all about horsepower, so something doesn't add up. It could be that German horses are simply stronger. Wouldn't be the first time we've noticed this.


Putting the Pieces Together

2014_cadillac_ctsvsport_ip_ft_813132_717.jpg


The Vsport is certainly rapid, the speed on the MRC stacking up continuously in big chunks with each quick gearchange from the new automatic. The engine's muted purr and flat torque delivery make for deceptively quick progress. This is refined potency, rather than the all-out sturm und drang of the CTS-V. Meanwhile, the Vsport's chassis exhibits poise and alertness, and drives smaller than it is.

This apparent feat of shrinking is the sign of a capable car, one that's willing to change direction but isn't nervous, and provides reliable intel on the status of grip at both ends of the car through the helm and the seat of your pants.

For sure, the car is doing some of the work for us. The MRC is not an easy circuit to memorize and will not suffer shunts kindly, so we left the CTS's driving mode in the Track setting. This loosens up the stability control and tightens the MR dampers, steering and gearchange schedule to better suit track use, natch, while still providing a safety net if things go wrong. The differential is also busy shuttling torque to influence the car's attitude, and while you can feel the systems at work, they certainly don't neuter the drive.

In fact, the Vsport is one of those cases where the wizardry onboard is an aid rather than a hindrance. The MR dampers keep the car beautifully flat even in hard corners, while still maintaining a resiliency that allows it to soak up berms without becoming unsettled. It follows its intended path with precision, thanks to the fancy diff and electric-assist steering that is at once precise and intuitive.

Uncharted Territory

2014_cadillac_ctsvsport_fint_ft_813133_717.jpg


Among the better-executed interpretations of Cadillac's modern design language to date, the Vsport's sheet metal blends substance with grace. A long cowl-to-front-axle relationship emphasizes the new CTS's rear-drive layout (squint and you might see an E-Class in its proportions). The cabin's theme is similar to that of the ATS, though every surface feels richer and there's noticeably more space. The instrument cluster is reconfigurable, too, similar to that found in the C7 Corvette.

The 2014 Cadillac CTS Vsport is taut, crisp and looks the part of a $60,000 car. OK, $59,995 with destination. Spring for the Premium trim level and the Vsport's base price rises to a few shekels shy of $70 grand. This makes the Vsport even dearer than the existing CTS-V, and Cadillac expects some 15 percent of new CTS sales to be Vsport models.

Yet the Vsport is bang-on the price of a 550i and is a more convincing alternative to it than is the CTS-V. Our initial impression is that the Vsport's chassis is up to the task of outshining the 550i, while still allowing room in the CTS range for a truly menacing CTS-V variant. A 'tweener no more; a 'tweener once again.

Track Test Results

2014_cadillac_ctsvsport_eng_ft_813135_717.jpg


0-30 mph (sec.) 2.1
0-45 mph (sec.) 3.4
0-60 mph (sec.) 5.1
0-75 mph (sec.) 7.2
1/4-mile (sec. @ mph) 13.3 @ 106.3
60-0 mph (ft.) 103
Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph) 69.8
Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g) 0.95


Test Driver Comments

2014_cadillac_ctsvsport_seat_ft_813132_717.jpg


Acceleration Comments - Whacking the throttle to the floor in default Tour/Drive mode, the car pauses a moment before leaving. Upshifts are smooth, but not particularly fast. Climbing the ladder of modes (Tour/Sport/Track) hastens shifting dramatically. The best run was in Sport/Drive with only a hint of wheelspin. I tried more wheelspin, less wheelspin, and the times only grew longer in either case. I'm at a loss to explain why we were about a half-second behind GM's 0-60 estimate because there's essentially no driver skill involved once under way.

Braking Comments - Immediate reaction from the pedal, near-zero dive and straight. Rapid and silent ABS cycles are unobtrusive. Extremely powerful and confident brakes that also resist heat well, as shown by the six stops separated by just 2 feet.

Handling Comments - The CTS Vsport is one of those cars that is deceptively capable in the slalom because it goes through the cones with little drama and doesn't overtax the driver. Steering is crisp and friction-free, but supplies just enough info about the front tires. Once I realized the leniency of the ESC, I could even lift to snub understeer, induce oversteer, then get back on the throttle and do it all over again for the next cone -- predictably and precisely. It felt like I had days between cones because the grip gives up so progressively.

 

ktraver97ss

I say what everyone thinks
Aug 29, 2007
13,458
142
Roselle, IL
I agree, I think i like the ext styling better from the current V, but ill wait till i see the new V in person before judging too much. I feel like the ass sticks out too far behind the rear tires. I think if this was shorter and lower it would look better, but i understand that with ATS now and competing with the 5 series this had to happen.
 

Primalzer

TCG Elite Member
Sep 14, 2006
25,259
61
The new CTS looks much much better IMO. I always found the previous gen CTS' styling to be a bit lazy. The sides are just slabs, there's no real effort. The front and back are very angular, and modern, but lacking any substance. Whereas the new car looks quite a bit more muscular, the profile view is long and low, the front is just sexy without being boring or busy, the only thing I'm not completely sold on is dat ass. Not bad, but nothing to write home about.

2014-CTS-17.jpg

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
2012-cts-1.jpg
 

jason05gt

TCG Elite Member
Jan 17, 2007
15,307
7,195
Naperville
GM seems to be making headway on driving dynamics. From the reviews, they are getting real close to BMW in terms of driving enjoyment. Though BMW is losing its mojo in that the IS350 F Sport has now won a few comparisons.

Styling wise the new CTS looks great from the front and side. It all goes downhill in the rear. GM seems like they cannot finish off a good design (ahem C7).

There are two things that GM hasn’t figured out yet. First is how to make a class leading interior. Cadillac openly copied BMW via reverse engineering in the ATS for the suspension tuning, so copy Audi for the interior refinement! It still doesn’t look luxurious to me. Secondly, this car is expensive. Just because the Cadillac performs with BMW, Audi, and Lexus in terms of performance doesn’t mean that the brand has earned that level of prestige.
 

jason05gt

TCG Elite Member
Jan 17, 2007
15,307
7,195
Naperville
Cadillacs have always been expensive though... Hell in the late 80s some where 60k. Mostly eveyone I deal with on a day to day basis are die hard Cadillac lifers

And that’s why Cadillac’s brand has a big issue. The average owner age is 60+. These “die hard” lifers (aka baby boomers) are DIEING. Cadillac needs to attract young professionals and most young people cannot afford $70K plus cars and the guys that can have moved on. My dad was a Caddy/Lincoln guy since he owned a business that sold to the Big 3. He bought a 97 740iL and hasn’t looked back. Cadillac lost a lot of customers because they built badge engineered junk (Lincoln too). Less than 15 years ago, both were the top selling brands in America. That image is still engrained in a lot of people’s minds. That’s why I say that the Cadillac brand doesn’t have the prestige of the Germans or even Lexus.
 

Primalzer

TCG Elite Member
Sep 14, 2006
25,259
61
Thats exactly what i was thinking. Junk-ass Northstar DTS' were $$$ back then, for a little more on the sticker almost 20 years later your are getting a shitload better car in all areas.

The DTS' weren't all that expensive, one of the last years of the DTS, my grandpa bought for I believe a shave over $35K. The MSRP might be stupid high, but actual cost to buy is stupid low.
 

syP

Not Banned
May 24, 2007
30,096
357
Downers Grove, Illinois
And that’s why Cadillac’s brand has a big issue. The average owner age is 60+. These “die hard” lifers (aka baby boomers) are DIEING. Cadillac needs to attract young professionals and most young people cannot afford $70K plus cars and the guys that can have moved on. My dad was a Caddy/Lincoln guy since he owned a business that sold to the Big 3. He bought a 97 740iL and hasn’t looked back. Cadillac lost a lot of customers because they built badge engineered junk (Lincoln too). Less than 15 years ago, both were the top selling brands in America. That image is still engrained in a lot of people’s minds. That’s why I say that the Cadillac brand doesn’t have the prestige of the Germans or even Lexus.

:dunno:

That is what the ATS/CTS are for.


90% of my clientele who own a CTS or ATS are in their late 20s to mid 40s.

Now if we were talking XTS, then yes, 90% are old farts who have no idea what technology is.
 

Primalzer

TCG Elite Member
Sep 14, 2006
25,259
61
Would seriously consider a chevy version of the ATS, but at this point, the ATS is priced outside of what I would consider spending on a car like that. Personally I don't want most of that tech BS. Give me iPod integration and Bluetooth. I don't need fancy huge LCD touchscreens, GPS, etc. That doesn't mean I want a cheap looking interior, use quality feeling materials. Which GM really hasn't figured out yet. Cheap interior doesn't need to be cheap looking.
 

syP

Not Banned
May 24, 2007
30,096
357
Downers Grove, Illinois
Would seriously consider a chevy version of the ATS, but at this point, the ATS is priced outside of what I would consider spending on a car like that. Personally I don't want most of that tech BS. Give me iPod integration and Bluetooth. I don't need fancy huge LCD touchscreens, GPS, etc. That doesn't mean I want a cheap looking interior, use quality feeling materials. Which GM really hasn't figured out yet. Cheap interior doesn't need to be cheap looking.
The ATS does come without that stuff.. its rare, but ive seen it


Also, cheaper version of the ATS:
Buick Regal GS 2.0T with brembo package
 
Old Thread: Hello . There have been no replies in this thread for 90 days.
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant. Consider starting a new thread to get fresh replies.

Thread Info