đź“° Auto News Getrag US Files For Bankruptcy

Mook

Mr. Manager
Staff member
Admin
May 23, 2007
207,179
119,014
Elgin
Real Name
Mike
Getrag US Files For Bankruptcy After Chrysler Lawsuit, Transmission Plant Sits Unfinished

If you need more proof Chrysler is going to have a rough future, check out the bankruptcy filings for Getrag Transmission Manufacturing. The non-Ford US arm of transmission manufacturer Getrag filed for bankruptcy protection because it will be unable to pay for an Indiana plant it was supposed to build with Chrysler. We reported last year about the $530 million plant that was going to build a six-speed DSG gearbox for future Chrysler cars. Chrysler is suing Getrag for failing to secure $300 million in debt financing as part of the joint-agreement. As one can imagine, getting credit in this market to build a plant for future Chrysler cars isn't easy.

Though the plant is 80% complete, it isn't clear who could come in and pay for completion of the plant or if Chrysler will have cars to put the new transmissions in for the future since the company has few new cars coming down the pipeline. This is more bad financiapocalypse news for Indiana, a state in need of those extra jobs.

jalopnik.png
 

DOC-Z

Chickun maka LOUSY housspaat!
Oct 13, 2008
1,386
158
Johnsburg, IL.
Real Name
-Larry
Ya know, first congress mandates loans for anyone who wanted a home. The banking industry was completely against securing 110%+ for people who had no proof they could pay it back. But the 'good ol' US govt.' (specifically one Illinois senator) sued the banking industry and somehow won. Millions of unsecured loans were given out like candy-which brought us to today. Now there is a huge credit crunch, so we elect one of the main idiots to be president? We did it to ourselves through over regulation!
 

DOC-Z

Chickun maka LOUSY housspaat!
Oct 13, 2008
1,386
158
Johnsburg, IL.
Real Name
-Larry
BullSHIT!!...you are going to sit there and tell me the government...who can't even balance a budget...knows better than the Chief Lending Officer at AIG, Bob Lutz or J.P. Morgan (!?!) when it comes to their game? The government is why we have 98% of the problems we are experiencing today. If they would quit trying to justify their existence by adding law upon stupid law, maybe we could get out of this mess before the $ crashes and a loaf of bread costs $20!
 

Primalzer

TCG Elite Member
Sep 14, 2006
25,259
61
BullSHIT!!...you are going to sit there and tell me the government...who can't even balance a budget...knows better than the Chief Lending Officer at AIG, Bob Lutz or J.P. Morgan (!?!) when it comes to their game? The government is why we have 98% of the problems we are experiencing today. If they would quit trying to justify their existence by adding law upon stupid law, maybe we could get out of this mess before the $ crashes and a loaf of bread costs $20!

2 out of the 3 companies that you mentioned are going bankrupt, and the other is getting a bailout, so I would say that they are about just as smart as the government in managing their finances.
 

sickmint79

I Drink Your Milkshake
Mar 2, 2008
27,056
16,854
grayslake
Ya know, first congress mandates loans for anyone who wanted a home. The banking industry was completely against securing 110%+ for people who had no proof they could pay it back. But the 'good ol' US govt.' (specifically one Illinois senator) sued the banking industry and somehow won. Millions of unsecured loans were given out like candy-which brought us to today. Now there is a huge credit crunch, so we elect one of the main idiots to be president? We did it to ourselves through over regulation!

this is wrong (or dishonest if you know better) - the reason so many bad loans are out there is not because of those laws. most of the places bad loans originated from weren't subject to those mandates, and of the ones that were granted through those mandates, they are performing better than the rest of subprime loans. the biggest entity in government to blame is the federal reserve.
 

sickmint79

I Drink Your Milkshake
Mar 2, 2008
27,056
16,854
grayslake

i don't think this is true either, only liberal economists even bring up the one major act of deregulation that took place (glass steagall, under clinton) and i would also note that the republicans tried to get more regulation in for fannie (too late) - i think this regulation was more as a response to shady/criminal behavior rather than around how GSEs like fannie/freddie distort the market.

this bubble was made possible by a tax environment that encouraged and rewarded speculation, consumer greed and lender greed. the biggest culprit was the federal reserve with a loose money policy. if we had a truly free market, the bubble would not have happened because the market regulates itself. money would never have been this cheap to begin with and we would have never hit this extreme. it is socialist entities that need the regulation, so i really don't mind having more for something like fannie mae, where is is privatized profits and socialized losses. some things i'm not sure if anybody is smart enough now (or ever) to regulate though, like the federal reserve and its behavior. IMO though i'm not so sure the federal reserve should exist!
 

02BlueGT

No Fucks Have Been Given
Feb 21, 2008
9,922
18
Now apearing in Hanover Park
^^^While you guys are right, I feel that there should have been more prevention of these Adjustable rate loans, thats what killed everyone's budget, your house payment increasing drastically, sometimes even doubling after 5 or 7 years.....This kind of loan is a scam and everyone who got them obviously didn't ream the small print, I feel this should have been and should be illegal.... but this kind of load wasn't really monitored by the Fed gov't.... But then again, we can't expect them to do everything for us......I just wish this country was smarter as a whole, that would make situations like this smaller and less likely:picard:
 

sickmint79

I Drink Your Milkshake
Mar 2, 2008
27,056
16,854
grayslake
i had an ARM, i used it just fine. so did several friends of mine. adjustable rate loans are fine. stupid people who think they are going to flip their house or it would just keep going up in value are not. or people that didn't think of budget after possible increase in ARM percentage. i'm sure some people will claim now that they didn't know, but at the time i'm quite certain they were told this.

another problem we have now is how young people have grown up in this system (myself included) - they have never really seen a rainy day. so why save for one? they haven't known anything but easy credit and easy money. they practically see credit cards and credit as an entitlement. and oh sure, the government should make x and y entitlements too. i think everybody is going to be getting an education over the next few years though.
 
Old Thread: Hello . There have been no replies in this thread for 90 days.
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant. Consider starting a new thread to get fresh replies.

Thread Info