I cant wait to get the 3.0 pulley in and rip it again with a little ras gas. I may not even need the high octane,
275whp
351 ft/lbs
275whp
351 ft/lbs
follow_along_with_video_below_to_see_how_to_install_our_site_as_web_app
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally posted by MIKES3@Aug 26 2006, 07:57 PM
I cant wait to get the 3.0 pulley in and rip it again with a little ras gas. I may not even need the high octane,
275whp
351 ft/lbs
[snapback]136527[/snapback]
Originally posted by 2000gpgt@Aug 26 2006, 08:53 PM
good numbers. where did you go for the dyno and did they do any tuning
[snapback]136536[/snapback]
275whp... Well Might be easier than I thought...
Originally posted by PaceCarBoozer@Aug 26 2006, 11:30 PM
Nice numbers to Mike and Ron, so whats next Mikey, I know you want 300.
CJ
[snapback]136552[/snapback]
Originally posted by PaceCarBoozer@Aug 26 2006, 11:30 PM
Nice numbers to Mike and Ron, so whats next Mikey, I know you want 300.
CJ
[snapback]136552[/snapback]
That's sweet, Mike! Are you still on a stock trans
NO... Im hitting 300 first.. Mike you hit it ... You know my line...
Originally posted by MIKES3@Aug 27 2006, 10:31 AM
I may go to 1.9 rocker and a 3.0 pulley.
most will last for at 3 runs or less- :lolsign:Originally posted by syP@Aug 31 2006, 12:20 AM
lol ask bumpinGTP about stock trans
[snapback]137069[/snapback]
Originally posted by MIKES3+Aug 27 2006, 10:31 AM--><!--QuoteBegin-PaceCarBoozer@Aug 26 2006, 11:30 PM
Nice numbers to Mike and Ron, so whats next Mikey, I know you want 300.
CJ
[snapback]136552[/snapback]
Thanks CJ. I'm honestly not sure what's next. I may go to 1.9 rocker and a 3.0 pulley. Will see what happens. I have to take it easy for a little while.
That's sweet, Mike! Are you still on a stock trans
NO... Im hitting 300 first.. Mike you hit it ... You know my line...
Nope, I did not hit it yet. I want 300 to the wheels and thats not an easy task, but it is doable. 300 crank hp is about 15% more than wheel horse power. It may be a tad more for FWD, but you get the idea.
[snapback]136578[/snapback][/b]
Originally posted by chipmonk212121+Aug 31 2006, 12:39 AM-->Originally posted by MIKES3@Aug 27 2006, 10:31 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-PaceCarBoozer@Aug 26 2006, 11:30 PM
Nice numbers to Mike and Ron, so whats next Mikey, I know you want 300.
CJ
[snapback]136552[/snapback]
Thanks CJ. I'm honestly not sure what's next. I may go to 1.9 rocker and a 3.0 pulley. Will see what happens. I have to take it easy for a little while.
That's sweet, Mike! Are you still on a stock trans
NO... Im hitting 300 first.. Mike you hit it ... You know my line...
Nope, I did not hit it yet. I want 300 to the wheels and thats not an easy task, but it is doable. 300 crank hp is about 15% more than wheel horse power. It may be a tad more for FWD, but you get the idea.
[snapback]136578[/snapback]
15%? i thought someone on here said it was more than that?
[snapback]137075[/snapback][/b]