3800 Dyno Results

MIKES3

TCG Elite Member
May 25, 2007
3,835
21
Algonquin, Illinois
I cant wait to get the 3.0 pulley in and rip it again with a little ras gas. I may not even need the high octane,

275whp
351 ft/lbs

DynoRuns001.jpg
 

MIKES3

TCG Elite Member
May 25, 2007
3,835
21
Algonquin, Illinois
Originally posted by 2000gpgt@Aug 26 2006, 08:53 PM
good numbers. where did you go for the dyno and did they do any tuning
[snapback]136536[/snapback]​

Me, Mike K and Ron V. went out there along with Steve Miller and another gentlemen. Ron did the tuning and the dyno place is called Garage Kwai. Its an import shop with a Dyno Jet. Nice guys.


275whp... Well Might be easier than I thought...

Keep trying bud :)
 
I

imported_Ron Vogel

Guest
Chad, I only peaked hp higher by 11 hp! I did make almost 400ft lbs, but the run started at 3200 rpm so I don't know an exact # since TQ peaked before then.

Your #'s are nice Chad, but you have to remember it's not all about peak HP #'s!
 

smug

Please go back to eating crayons
TCG Premium
Aug 4, 2007
8,089
3,761
Cedar Lake, IN
Real Name
Dan Erickson
I would have went if i would have know. I need a dyno tune so badly, I am running stock VE, AE, PE tables, and what other advanced tuning. The only thing i a can do is tune the maf sensor. I went to the track friday night and have added 3.0 pulley, headers, 42.5 lb injectors, did more exhaust work under the car and ran the same time <_<
 

MIKES3

TCG Elite Member
May 25, 2007
3,835
21
Algonquin, Illinois
Originally posted by PaceCarBoozer@Aug 26 2006, 11:30 PM
Nice numbers to Mike and Ron, so whats next Mikey, I know you want 300.
CJ
[snapback]136552[/snapback]​


Thanks CJ. I'm honestly not sure what's next. I may go to 1.9 rocker and a 3.0 pulley. Will see what happens. I have to take it easy for a little while.


That's sweet, Mike! Are you still on a stock trans

Yes, I am on my stock trans, but IMO I think these trans are a lot stronger than people think. As long as you maintain everything all will be good for a little longer. I have 94k on a stock trans and this bad boy has been modded with the 3.4 pulley and its backups for quite some time. I get my pan dropped every 30k-40k with a new filter. For some reason I'm not a believer of flushing the trans. That's just me though. Everyone has there differences.


NO... Im hitting 300 first.. Mike you hit it ... You know my line...


Nope, I did not hit it yet. I want 300 to the wheels and thats not an easy task, but it is doable. 300 crank hp is about 15% more than wheel horse power. It may be a tad more for FWD, but you get the idea.
 

phat_ridegt

TCG Elite Member
Sep 16, 2007
3,351
2
Ottawa
x2 on the cam...you def. would not regret going xp...esp. with that intercooler/header setup...look at chad...when he adds an ic, he'll probably see 340whp...

nice numbers tho man. i pulled 260 on a mustang dyno, with xp ssic and togs...so you got some good numbers. as soon as mike lets me pick up that ic, ill be dynoing also. good luck!
 

chipmonk212121

TCG Elite Member
May 28, 2007
2,731
0
Originally posted by MIKES3+Aug 27 2006, 10:31 AM-->
<!--QuoteBegin-PaceCarBoozer
@Aug 26 2006, 11:30 PM
Nice numbers to Mike and Ron, so whats next Mikey, I know you want 300.
CJ
[snapback]136552[/snapback]​


Thanks CJ. I'm honestly not sure what's next. I may go to 1.9 rocker and a 3.0 pulley. Will see what happens. I have to take it easy for a little while.


That's sweet, Mike! Are you still on a stock trans


NO... Im hitting 300 first.. Mike you hit it ... You know my line...


Nope, I did not hit it yet. I want 300 to the wheels and thats not an easy task, but it is doable. 300 crank hp is about 15% more than wheel horse power. It may be a tad more for FWD, but you get the idea.
[snapback]136578[/snapback]​
[/b]

15%? i thought someone on here said it was more than that?
 

SaturdaysGS

TCG Elite Member
Jul 15, 2007
4,985
2,003
Chicago (Southside)
Originally posted by chipmonk212121+Aug 31 2006, 12:39 AM-->
Originally posted by MIKES3@Aug 27 2006, 10:31 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-PaceCarBoozer
@Aug 26 2006, 11:30 PM
Nice numbers to Mike and Ron, so whats next Mikey, I know you want 300.
CJ
[snapback]136552[/snapback]​



Thanks CJ. I'm honestly not sure what's next. I may go to 1.9 rocker and a 3.0 pulley. Will see what happens. I have to take it easy for a little while.


That's sweet, Mike! Are you still on a stock trans


NO... Im hitting 300 first.. Mike you hit it ... You know my line...


Nope, I did not hit it yet. I want 300 to the wheels and thats not an easy task, but it is doable. 300 crank hp is about 15% more than wheel horse power. It may be a tad more for FWD, but you get the idea.
[snapback]136578[/snapback]​

15%? i thought someone on here said it was more than that?
[snapback]137075[/snapback]​
[/b]

I would garner a guess of about 21%.. 15% would be a very efficient MTX.
 
Old Thread: Hello . There have been no replies in this thread for 90 days.
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant. Consider starting a new thread to get fresh replies.

Thread Info