3800 KR probs with 3.4"

10sec

I haz dat teddy bear smile.
TCG Premium
Jul 26, 2008
25,951
5,836
Mod list? Besides that when you car is cold the knock sensors aren't enabled until the temperature reaches a certain point which according to my stock computer file is 162* under that they aren't working. You know what that means right? Also 11psi seems kinda high, if i were to guess you don't have very much exhaust work or you did that when it was cold ass hell outside which would still be kinda high but nothing out of the norm.
 

curado

Regular
Nov 11, 2008
100
0
Mod list? Besides that when you car is cold the knock sensors aren't enabled until the temperature reaches a certain point which according to my stock computer file is 162* under that they aren't working. You know what that means right? Also 11psi seems kinda high, if i were to guess you don't have very much exhaust work or you did that when it was cold ass hell outside which would still be kinda high but nothing out of the norm.

Shit. You're right. Totally invalidates that scan then. 161.59 is my knock sensor enable temp. It took it a while to warm up even parked in the garage. It was just getting to 180 by the end of that scan.

Mods: Hole-sawed air box with clean filter, 104s, 180 stat, 3.4", wideband in the manifold, EGR disabled at time of scan, and 3" randomtech downpipe with wbodystore 3" cat <-- most restrictive cat ever?. 28 degrees outside.

Someone told me to try a fuel additive to check for false knock...
 
Last edited:

10sec

I haz dat teddy bear smile.
TCG Premium
Jul 26, 2008
25,951
5,836
well the ultra cold weather plus the 3.4 without headers is going to result in your current kr problem. Headers oughta free up the exhaust enough to lower that kr to a reasonable level. Until then if you see fit i would put a stock pulley on for the winter so you don't accidentally hurt the motor. Unlikely but a possibility nonetheless. If that isn't an option just don't get on it lol. I would skip the fuel additive idea to find false kr, it isn't false the mod list just isn't enough to flow for a 3.4 pulley, hence the 11psi. Should spike at 10 tops in this cold weather anything on top of that without an i/c results in... you guessed it, kr.
 

bikrboy128

Some say.....
TCG Premium
Jul 15, 2007
12,897
11,611
Wheaton
Honestly you don't have enough mods to SAFELY run a 3.4, especially with +4 degrees of timing. I ran a 3.4 with an intake/pems/dp/magnaflow cat and stock timing and would see blips of 1* KR here and there.


:werd:

once i got an aftermarket PCM my kr jumped up a few degrees, then when i installed my TOGs that KR disappeared.
 

curado

Regular
Nov 11, 2008
100
0
Well I'm glad there's nothing too abnormal about my car then. Sounds like I need to address the flow. Maybe this tuning guide is a little misinforming?

In the past, I was plagued with massive flash KR and finally after trying out a suggestion of starting out with a 2002 GTP bin, this file in conjunction with a 3.4 pulley, I had incredible success with. We are talking WOT O2s of 920-930, idle/cruise timing of 45, WOT timing of 22 degrees (+6 over stock!) and no KR. All this was made on 87 octane fuel!!​

http://wiki.opentuner3800.com/index.php?title=Introduction

And his tuning was accomplished with a narrowband? :dunno:
 

10sec

I haz dat teddy bear smile.
TCG Premium
Jul 26, 2008
25,951
5,836
lol sounds like a bunch of bullshit to me, 22* of timing with 87 octane on a stock ass pulley with more supporting mods than you have wouldn't be unachievable, and this person claims a 3.4?! haha! Yeah right... I guess i could say i ran a 1.75 pulley as my only mod and couldn't afford 93 so i put in 87 and it was knock free all day everyday, would that hold any water? I understand you're new to this, but you should get more opinions, kinda like here. Us w-body peeps stick together and we're always more than willing to help you out anytime. :bigthumb:

Ninja edit: I just read the link and lol to that, there's plenty of people running deep into the 12's and even into the 11's that get close to 30mpg's on the highway you can have both performance and mpg's in one combo if you know what you're doing. I get great mpg's now that i'm back on 93 octane (22/29) on 60# injectors lol, letting my car warm up for 10-15 min every time i drive it. It's a race car, so the race oil has to heat up before i can drive it lol.
 
Last edited:

curado

Regular
Nov 11, 2008
100
0
I was a former w-body owner a few cars ago prior to this car but I'm new to w-body tuning. I thought that guide would be a good benchmark for a successful tune. If he's totally full of shit, then the picture is clearer now.

I figured a 3.4 would mean:

Fuel enrichment - moderate
Spark - stock to moderate increase ok (based on the tuning genius)
Flow - requires better than stock but not aggressive (some backpressure ok)
Output temps - borderline KR / limiting factor (reason for AL104s, 180 stat)

I can probably juggle flow and output temps around. Anything against methanol kits?
 

curado

Regular
Nov 11, 2008
100
0
It's in the front manifold. Figured the cat would interfere with it otherwise.

One thing that is really pissing me off is the DHP software. It logs about 500 rows of ADC inputs, then my O2 volt just stays the same. So I have a log of 500 rows of useful info and the rest says "2.25 V" from that point on until I click Disconnect / Connect again.
 

Fish

From the quiet street
TCG Premium
Aug 3, 2007
40,579
7,992
Hanover Park
Real Name
Fish
lol sounds like a bunch of bullshit to me, 22* of timing with 87 octane on a stock ass pulley with more supporting mods than you have wouldn't be unachievable, and this person claims a 3.4?! haha! Yeah right... I guess i could say i ran a 1.75 pulley as my only mod and couldn't afford 93 so i put in 87 and it was knock free all day everyday, would that hold any water? I understand you're new to this, but you should get more opinions, kinda like here. Us w-body peeps stick together and we're always more than willing to help you out anytime. :bigthumb:

Ninja edit: I just read the link and lol to that, there's plenty of people running deep into the 12's and even into the 11's that get close to 30mpg's on the highway you can have both performance and mpg's in one combo if you know what you're doing. I get great mpg's now that i'm back on 93 octane (22/29) on 60# injectors lol, letting my car warm up for 10-15 min every time i drive it. It's a race car, so the race oil has to heat up before i can drive it lol.


A guy who is so full of bullshit that DHP and HPT both look towards him for V6 tuning. Yeah, I guess........:noes::s00ls:
 

02BlueGT

No Fucks Have Been Given
Feb 21, 2008
9,922
18
Now apearing in Hanover Park
prove him at least 1/2 right, Run the same timing on your stock pulley kr free, then put in 87 and do it again. Thank you for playing you lose.


02SSEi said:
If i recall the guy who wrote that guide had an XP cam too.


and from the Wiki:
Disclaimer: The information on these pages comes as the result of me tuning my 1999 Grand Prix GTP in conjunction with the modifications I had on the car at the time that I did this tune. It may or may not be applicable to your application.

sorry 11sec, a little reading....... if he has a cam, headers, and some other mods, I could see full timing on a 3.4, especially if he is running an IC, sadly there is no mod list on the wiki.......
 

10sec

I haz dat teddy bear smile.
TCG Premium
Jul 26, 2008
25,951
5,836
Actually, Ive read more from Jerry then you possibly know. You my friend, lose.

I don't care what you've read about his tuning, i want you to run 22* of timing with your current mods on 87 octane, you do that and I'll admit defeat. Until then seems like a load of shit, just someone trying to talk up how good they are at it, while fudging quite a bit of information. That is all...
 
Old Thread: Hello . There have been no replies in this thread for 90 days.
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant. Consider starting a new thread to get fresh replies.

Thread Info