I don't fully understand what point you are trying to make. Are you suggesting that the same "factory torque spec" be used while torquing a fastener with anti-seize vs dry; or are you saying the exact opposite? Some of your wording is confusing me.
When it comes to adjusting a torque spec for a non-TTY fastener: This is specifically why the kinetic friction coefficient needs to be taken into account for whatever "lube" is being used so as to determine that "x" amount of tensile clamping force is not exceeded with a given input torque. This in turn will ensure that the proportional limit of the Shear Modulus is not exceeded in the fastener regarding stretch and/or work-hardening past the point of yield. So, in short, as long as an accurate figure for the different lube's kinetic friction coefficient is used, then all will be well. I believe that's what sickmint was alluding towards when citing that other webpage.
Another point I want to make is that you're dealing with relatively large bolt sizes here, as well as other "large" structural members that are more forgiving, so if one is off by a few lb/ft of torque, it isn't exactly going to hurt anything. As with anything in engineering, there's an acceptable range between minimal and maximum tolerance. Stay within those confines and all will be well. After all, if you are that worried about hitting a wheel stud torque spec 100% dead on, then I hope you are also sending your torque wrench off on a semi-annual basis to be recalibrated too!
I have used anti-seize on my lugs for years to prevent galling and sticking; and it works. Yes, the input torque does have to be adjusted down a bit, but it's not rocket science if one bothers to actually do a simple algebraic computation to adjust for the new coefficient of friction. You guys are making it out to be like these guys are trying to build a better space shuttle, when it's but a simple recalibration of a torque spec for a fastener.