Chicago Sues camera light company Redflex for $300M

nytebyte

Not Politically Correct
Mar 2, 2004
13,680
21,154
Was reading about this earlier and found this little gem of a comment by Emanuel's lawyer:

The suit is brought under the City's False Claims Ordinance and seeks damages, plus civil penalties, attorneys' fees and costs, as a result of Redflex's fraudulent conduct in obtaining its 2003 and subsequent contracts with the City ....

This action is the latest example of the administration fighting on behalf of Chicago taxpayers.


Fighting on behalf of the Chicago taxpayer's ??!?!?!?!?! AAAAHHHhhahahahahahahahaaaaaaa!!!

Yeah because the taxpayers just LOVE getting milked by the whole red light camera scam to the tune of almost $300,000,000 and they want to get fucked over more. Stupid fuckin' greedy corrupt mother fuckin' politicians.

:squintfinger:
 

b4black

before black
Jun 6, 2008
1,331
542
Oswego
Redflex, as a vendor to the municipality, had to sign multiple contracts that required the company to promise that it would not engage in bribery of public officials.

Well, if they did promise to not engage in bribery....

1) Thats like schools making kids sign a letter promising to be good and not do drugs. 2) The whole scheme is bribery to the City from the start. Redflex 'catches' people and they 'share' the money with the City. The City is just upset cause some indiviuals cut into their share.
 

Kaeghl

TCG Elite Member
TCG Premium
Nov 18, 2008
1,872
1,028
Aurora, IL
I was a contractor for the city of Chicago (software) for four years. Every year you have to go through ethics training which is basically them telling you exactly is legal and what is not.
The ethics laws and riders to the contract are there to make it explicitly illegal. SO there is no wiggle room or a loophole later.
 

Primalzer

TCG Elite Member
Sep 14, 2006
25,259
61
Judge Rules Against City of Chicago in Red-Light Camera Suit, Declares Tickets 'Void' | NBC Chicago

A Cook County judge has denied a request from the city of Chicago to dismiss a lawsuit claiming it denied due process to motorists ticketed under its red-light camera program.

The Chicago Sun-Times reports that Judge Kathleen Kennedy's late Friday ruling declares the tickets void and keeps alive a lawsuit seeking to have the city refund hundreds of millions of dollars to motorists ticketed since 2003.

Plaintiffs' attorney Jacie Zolna can now move forward with a request for class-action status. The lawsuit, filed on behalf of three named plaintiffs, argued the city violated a requirement to issue a second notice of violation before a determination of liability was issued against motorists.

City Law Department spokesman Bill McCaffrey says the city believes the plaintiffs aren't entitled to "any recovery, let alone any refunds."
 
Old Thread: Hello . There have been no replies in this thread for 90 days.
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant. Consider starting a new thread to get fresh replies.

Thread Info