New Iran Nuclear Plant

Blood on Blood

rumble baby rumble
Apr 6, 2005
56,795
46,609
Iran prepares to start first nuclear reactor after years of delay, Russia pledges to safeguard

Published August 20, 2010
| Associated Pres


BUSHEHR, Iran (AP) — Iranian and Russian nuclear technicians made final preparations to start up Iran's first reactor on Saturday after years of delays, an operation that will mark a milestone in what Tehran considers its right to produce nuclear energy.
Nationwide celebrations are planned for the fuel loading at the Bushehr facility in southern Iran, while Russia pledges to safeguard the plant and prevent spent nuclear fuel from being shifted to a possible weapons program.

"The startup operations will be a big success for Iran," conservative lawmaker Javad Karimi said in Tehran. "It also shows Iran's resolve and capability in pursuing its nuclear activities."

The West has not sought to block the reactor startup as part of its confrontations over Iran's nuclear agenda, a clash that has resulted in repeated rounds of U.N. sanctions against Tehran. Washington and other nations do not specifically object to Tehran's ability to build peaceful reactors that are under international scrutiny.

However, it is seen by hard-liners as defiance of U.N. Security Council sanctions that seek to slow Iran's nuclear advances — which Tehran's foes worry could eventually push toward atomic weapons.

What concerns America and others — including Russia — is Iran's refusal to halt uranium enrichment, a process that can be used to make fuel for nuclear arms.

Russia now must follow through with its agreements, signed by Iran, to remove all spent fuel at Bushehr and ship it back to Russia for reprocessing.
That's would make it impossible for Iran to use plutonium, contained in the spent fuel, for nuclear weapons. Iran has said U.N. nuclear agency experts will be able to verify none of the waste is diverted.

The uranium fuel used at Bushehr is well below the more than 90 percent enrichment needed for a nuclear warhead. Iran is already producing its own uranium enriched to the Bushehr level — about 3.5 percent. It also has started a pilot program of enriching uranium to 20 percent, which officials say is needed for a medical research reactor.

President Barack Obama's top adviser on nuclear issues, Gary Samore, told The New York Times that he thinks it would take Iran "roughly a year" to turn low-enriched uranium into weapons-grade material. The assessment was reportedly shared with Israel and could ease concerns over the possibility of an imminent Israeli military strike against Iranian nuclear facilities.

Iran's envoy to the U.N. nuclear watchdog, Ali Asghar Soltanieh, said Thursday that any military attack against an operational nuclear power plant would be a direct violation of the U.N. charter. It also would likely provoke international outrage by possibly unleashing dangerous radiation.
Iran has repeatedly denied it is seeking to build atomic weapons and says it has a right to produce its own fuel for several nuclear power plants it plans to build.

The nuclear reactor was a goal launched by the U.S.-backed shah in the 1970s and is now a symbol of the Islamic state's nuclear prowess.
Iranian officials say nationwide celebrations will begin once the fuel loading begins Saturday at the 1,000-megawatt, light-water reactor. Iran says it plans to build other reactors and says designs for a second rector in southwestern Iran are taking shape.

Of greater concern to the West, however, are Iran's stated plans to build 10 new uranium enrichment sites inside protected mountain strongholds. Iran said recently it will begin construction on the first one in March in defiance of the U.N. sanctions.

Russia — which began work on the reactor in 1995 — has backed the U.N.'s latest economic squeeze on Iran. But Russian officials argue that starting up the long-delayed Bushehr reactor would require Iran to deepen cooperation with U.N. nuclear inspectors and possibly lead Iran to resume talks over its uranium enrichment program.

Yet Iran has not slowed its push for military advances. Defense Minister Ahmad Vahidi said Friday forces have test-fired a new liquid-fueled missile with advanced guidance systems for ground targets.
Vahidi gave no other details of the new Qiam-1 missile during a nationally broadcast address ahead of Friday prayers at Tehran University. But it could raise Western fears about another advance in Iran's missile arsenal, which already can target Israel and other parts of the region.

The fuel-loading operation is expected to take at least a week at Bushehr, about 745 miles (1,200 kilometers) south of Tehran. It will take more than two months before it begins generating electricity.
Experts from the U.N. nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, are expected to monitor the transfer of fuel from a storage site to the reactor, according to Vice President Ali Akbar Salehi, who is also the head of Atomic Energy Organization of Iran.

The process ends years of foot dragging by Russia. Completion of the $1 billion project has been delayed several times. Iranian officials say operation of the plant is already more than a decade behind schedule.
On Friday, security was tight at the Bushehr site. Authorities only allowed cameramen and photographers to shoot from the gate of the sprawling complex on the shores of the Gulf.

Once fuel is loaded into the reactor, the Bushehr facility will be recognized as a nuclear plant under international terms.
Hamid Reza Taraqi, another hard-line leader, claimed the launch will boost Iran's international standing and "will show the failure of all sanctions" against Iran.

The Bushehr plant overlooks the Persian Gulf and is visible from several miles (kilometers) away with its cream-colored dome dominating the green landscape. Soldiers maintain a 24-hour watch on roads leading up to the plant, manning anti-aircraft guns and supported by numerous radar stations.
There are several housing facilities for employees inside the complex plus a separate large compound housing the families of Russian experts and technicians.

Russians began shipping fuel for the plant in 2007 and carried out a test-run of the plant in February 2009.

Russia has walked a fine line on Iran for years. It is one of the six powers leading international efforts to ensure Iran does not develop an atomic bomb. It has backed U.N. sanctions, but strongly criticized the U.S. and the European Union for following up with separate, stronger sanctions.

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad reiterated Friday that Tehran was ready to resume negotiations with the six major powers — the five permanent Security Council members plus Germany — about its nuclear program but insisted Iran would reject calls to completely halt uranium enrichment, a key U.N. demand.
Ahmadinejad had earlier said the talks could start in September, but in an interview with Japan's biggest newspaper, The Yomiuri Shimbun, he said the talks could start as early as this month.

The Bushehr project dates backs to 1974, when Iran's U.S.-backed Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi contracted with the German company Siemens to build the reactor. The company withdrew from the project after the 1979 Islamic Revolution toppled the shah.

The partially finished plant later sustained damages after it was bombed by Iraq during its 1980-88 war against Iran.
Before making the Russian deal to complete Bushehr, Iran signed pacts with Argentina, Spain and other countries only to see them canceled under U.S. pressure.
 

01GTvert

TCG Elite Member
Jan 30, 2006
1,755
2
The time to address was prior to U-235 arriving on site.

You guys should do more research. The UN even said it would take minimum 5yrs to get that u-235 to u-238 (weapons grade). That thing is just what they said it's for....energy. In addition to that Iran formally invited the USA to manage it but we declined so they went to Russia.

Besides, Iran's got a shitload of nukes already that it purchased from Russia and ....drum roll please......China. Where did china get the plans to build the ones they sold to Iran....USA (clinton admin).
 

Flyn

Go ahead. I'll catch up.
Moderator
TCG Premium
Mar 1, 2004
68,053
27,986
Selling homes on the Gulf Coast of Florida
We ain't gonna make no bombs in here, we ain't gonna make no bombs. We want the plants for the 'lectricity, we ain't gonna make no bombs. We love everybody in the world, we ain't gonna make no bombs. 'Tis just coincidence we're testing long range bombers, we ainnnnnnnnn't gonnnnnnnnna make no bombs. Trust us...:dancenana:
 

VenomousDSG

Don't Tread On Me
TCG Premium
Apr 30, 2006
20,800
22,301
Yorkville, il
We ain't gonna make no bombs in here, we ain't gonna make no bombs. We want the plants for the 'lectricity, we ain't gonna make no bombs. We love everybody in the world, we ain't gonna make no bombs. 'Tis just coincidence we're testing long range bombers, we ainnnnnnnnn't gonnnnnnnnna make no bombs. Trust us...:dancenana:

mmmmm, sounds legit to me
 

Blood on Blood

rumble baby rumble
Apr 6, 2005
56,795
46,609
You guys should do more research. The UN even said it would take minimum 5yrs to get that u-235 to u-238 (weapons grade). That thing is just what they said it's for....energy. In addition to that Iran formally invited the USA to manage it but we declined so they went to Russia.

Besides, Iran's got a shitload of nukes already that it purchased from Russia and ....drum roll please......China. Where did china get the plans to build the ones they sold to Iran....USA (clinton admin).

I am not referring to nuclear weapons. My contribution was in relation to when a plant is "non-critical" vs. "critical". U-235 is essential harmless in terms of a radioative leak until the plant becomes "critical".

If Israel hit the plant after it becomes critical/online or any non-nuclear term you wish to use, then there would be hell to pay and I doubt even the US was support those actions.
 

01GTvert

TCG Elite Member
Jan 30, 2006
1,755
2
I am not referring to nuclear weapons. My contribution was in relation to when a plant is "non-critical" vs. "critical". U-235 is essential harmless in terms of a radioative leak until the plant becomes "critical".

If Israel hit the plant after it becomes critical/online or any non-nuclear term you wish to use, then there would be hell to pay and I doubt even the US was support those actions.

I see your point and it is a good one but must disagree about the US not supporting Israel as we are owned lock, stock and barrel by the tiny nation.
 

Blood on Blood

rumble baby rumble
Apr 6, 2005
56,795
46,609
I see your point and it is a good one but must disagree about the US not supporting Israel as we are owned lock, stock and barrel by the tiny nation.

So you believe the US would support an attack on any critical state nuclear power plant knowing that devastation that would be caused, example Chernobyl? 24 years later and the after effect of Chernobyl is still evident.
 

01GTvert

TCG Elite Member
Jan 30, 2006
1,755
2
So, you are stating the US would not support an attack on a live reactor, yet the US would support anything Israel does no matter how ridiculous.

Doesn't that contradict?

right again....don't know what I was thinking when I wrote that.

I don't think Israel would bomb a critical facility based on what you said but still believe we'd back them for anything they'd do up to that point.
 
Old Thread: Hello . There have been no replies in this thread for 90 days.
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant. Consider starting a new thread to get fresh replies.

Thread Info