Prediction's of Bears Vs Packers
- Thread starter HeavyG
- Start date
Let's break this down.
QB - Being a Bears fan, I'll call it even although many people would put this stat in GB's favor.
RB - Bears. Forte is superior to Grant.
WRs - Packers. No contest here. GB's receivers are vastly better.
TE - Bears. Bears have 2 good TEs. Both are better than Lee and Finley.
K - Even. Crosby and Gould are both above average kickers.
DEF - Even although the GB DEF has looked really good in preseason. I worry about our secondary. The DEF line needs to step up and pressure Rodgers.
This looks to be a great game as most Bears - Packers games are. I'm hoping our running game can control the ball and help prevent Rodgers, Jennings and Driver from tearing apart our weak secondary. Prediction: IF the Bears DEF line pressures Rodgers: Bears 24. Packers 17. IF the Bears don't pressure Rodgers, Packers 34. Bears 13.
QB - Being a Bears fan, I'll call it even although many people would put this stat in GB's favor.
RB - Bears. Forte is superior to Grant.
WRs - Packers. No contest here. GB's receivers are vastly better.
TE - Bears. Bears have 2 good TEs. Both are better than Lee and Finley.
K - Even. Crosby and Gould are both above average kickers.
DEF - Even although the GB DEF has looked really good in preseason. I worry about our secondary. The DEF line needs to step up and pressure Rodgers.
This looks to be a great game as most Bears - Packers games are. I'm hoping our running game can control the ball and help prevent Rodgers, Jennings and Driver from tearing apart our weak secondary. Prediction: IF the Bears DEF line pressures Rodgers: Bears 24. Packers 17. IF the Bears don't pressure Rodgers, Packers 34. Bears 13.
As much as i'd love to argue that, i think you are 100% correct.
ahhh that sucks to even say that lolzz :biggthump
Thread Info
-
Created -
44Replies
-
1KViews
-
Participants list
